Posted on 05/08/2022 9:29:42 AM PDT by janetjanet998
In the film, Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote provide answers and evidence on the stolen 2020 Election. The explosive documentary was released on Tuesday at select theaters across the nation.
According to the evidence discussed in the movie, if you factor in just the Mule ballot traffickers: Trump won with 305 electoral votes. That does not even count all the other fraud that occurred during the election like the mysterious ballot drops at 3 in the morning or the questionable machines.
Did they follow these crooks back to their homes?
Maybe they need to be protested.
“ The whole process felt eerily like it had been ‘taken over’”
Maybe because it had been “taken over”. Supposedly due to Covid, big red cities used huge arenas for counting ballots instead of neighborhood precincts. I read that the poll watchers were very few and kept away from the tables
Where the counting was taking place. Instead of a certain number of poll watchers in a neighborhood precinct, that same number of poll watchers was allowed into an entire arena. I blame Ronna McDaniel and Pence at the top.
I just finished watching it. It is conclusive. I think they did the right thing, setting the bar for judging movements of mules engaged in illegal actions very high (10 drobboxes visited as well as the location of a non-profit stash house) and showing even that high bar would have changed the election.
If they lowered the bar, the election was a Trump rout of Biden.
Very well done. I thought it was well produced, the intro was nicely constructed with effects and music, and the logical presentation of the issue, followed by the various data elements used, layering and time synching the video evidence they obtained, how it affected the election, and ending with where they got the ballots from.
It was compelling to see the videoed reaction from the family of the elderly woman in the nursing home who has been in a mostly unresponsive state for years (according to the family sitting with her) to recount how astonished they were to find she had been voting in elections.
The led the observer along, deliberately explaining things (even some simple things they didn’t need to) and allowed most people to understand.
I was very impressed. If someone can explain how the data can be misinterpreted in some way, I would be willing to listen, but I think this is solid work. What are they going to do-say the tracking data is invalid? Sure. Here is who we purchased data from. The same place that the Georgia State Police or the Philadelphia District Attorney gets their data from.
That the video footage, time-synched with the cell phone footage was misleading? The video is the authentic property of the states legally obtained via allowable citizen requests and such.
And when you look at the pattern, repeated verbatim (NGO pickup points>>mules making rounds>>mules stuffing boxes with small numbers of ballots over time) over all the key battleground states, well...only an ingnoramus or ideologically driven scumbag would deny the compelling truth of this production.
“ only an ingnoramus or ideologically driven scumbag would deny the compelling truth of this production.”
Sadly there are plenty of these people around.
Agreed. Far too many. I was dwelling on this earlier, and it suddenly occurred to me that was is really alarming is that they are not even in the majority, not by a longshot.
And to be that comparatively less slice of the pie and to wield the influence they do, in government, media, entertainment, and education-that was sobering to me.
Whatever it takes to let FNC know we pay their bills and will not be abused over and over.
I was impressed with it, especially with how they showed the logistics of the stuffing of the boxes on the streets.
I had some minor objections, but they were stylistic and not to do with substance: there were a few simulated/dramatization scenes that I thought should have been clearly identified as such; I’m not a fan of the ‘watch us make a documentary’ format; and I didn’t like the weird rendition of the Anthem at the end. But I guess those are immaterial and just the product of figuring out how to tell and express the story.
Altogether, I thought it was very well done and effective.
It is illegal to expose NGOs, and/or provide information pertaining to them? I don’t think it is.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
they explained during the film that the data they ‘bought’ is the same that companies like CVS, etc can and DO purchase, to track our movements and tailor offers...
I didn’t watch the video, as I have limited internet access, and video eats it up rather fast. So, my response to the poster who said something about lawsuits coming soon, for him to start thinking about my comment. I guess he was thinking that they were like doxxing an individual or something. 🙂
I’m of the opinion that EVERY LAST ONE STRUCTURE at EVERY ONE of these addresses should be RAZED in forfeit.
Take every one of these places all the way down to bare naked dirt, then force !@#kerburg — at gunpoint if need be — to build housing for homeless veterans at every location.
The individual states are going to have to be the ones to file criminal charges against the fedscum crooks and mules.
The other option would be a Military Court.
Wag the Dog...
That's who the dems are. Either brainwashed,paid big bucks or both. They will lie,lie,lie and get the meida to follow up on their lies. Fortunately, we have better venues every day to follow up on their lies. But, be ready for it. It's all they have, lie and ignore.
Yes we need to arrest thjhose who funded this fraud, includingMark Zuckerberg.
BUT you say:
Charges by whom? I am skeptical that DA’s and AG’s will do anything. Look at the AG in Arizona (Bernovich).>>>>>>>>>>>>
If they are not interdicted there soon will be snipers assigned to watch every drop box and there will be mules dead and kicking while they bleed out in front of them. Thats the alternative if they are not interdicted and it will eventually happen if it has to.I would prefer the lawful interdiction, the alternative is horrible but then necessary.
I agree to a degree...for example, the contrived scenes where D’Souza and his wife get a phone call from someone with information were not the way I would have done it, but...I do think that when they did it, they did it about as well as could be done.
I have to admit, conservatives have long come off as comparative amateurs when it comes to addressing people regarding issues from the media/entertainment space, which is no surprise to anyone who pays attention.
After all, the media and entertainment circles are primarily leftist, and hard core ones at that.
But I have to say-D’Souza has definite talent.
The intro, with the beat of the music (perfectly chosen) and the CGI, showing a satellite streaking across space, and on the earth far below, appearing and disappearing red circles representing areas where data was purchased from legal providers of cellular tracking information.
It was as good as and worthy of any thriller movie produced at a higher budget than I have seen. Unfortunately, this is necessary and not fluff. There are too many people who, if not hooked by a mechanism like that, don’t have the attention span to stay tuned, and will switch to something else. Sad but true.
“if he saw a pretty girl, he would just reach out and grab a boob or something ‘worse’”.
KNOWING he had a ready excuse, there was no suppressing of the urge.
Yep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.