I just finished watching it. It is conclusive. I think they did the right thing, setting the bar for judging movements of mules engaged in illegal actions very high (10 drobboxes visited as well as the location of a non-profit stash house) and showing even that high bar would have changed the election.
If they lowered the bar, the election was a Trump rout of Biden.
Very well done. I thought it was well produced, the intro was nicely constructed with effects and music, and the logical presentation of the issue, followed by the various data elements used, layering and time synching the video evidence they obtained, how it affected the election, and ending with where they got the ballots from.
It was compelling to see the videoed reaction from the family of the elderly woman in the nursing home who has been in a mostly unresponsive state for years (according to the family sitting with her) to recount how astonished they were to find she had been voting in elections.
The led the observer along, deliberately explaining things (even some simple things they didn’t need to) and allowed most people to understand.
I was very impressed. If someone can explain how the data can be misinterpreted in some way, I would be willing to listen, but I think this is solid work. What are they going to do-say the tracking data is invalid? Sure. Here is who we purchased data from. The same place that the Georgia State Police or the Philadelphia District Attorney gets their data from.
That the video footage, time-synched with the cell phone footage was misleading? The video is the authentic property of the states legally obtained via allowable citizen requests and such.
And when you look at the pattern, repeated verbatim (NGO pickup points>>mules making rounds>>mules stuffing boxes with small numbers of ballots over time) over all the key battleground states, well...only an ingnoramus or ideologically driven scumbag would deny the compelling truth of this production.
“ only an ingnoramus or ideologically driven scumbag would deny the compelling truth of this production.”
Sadly there are plenty of these people around.
I was impressed with it, especially with how they showed the logistics of the stuffing of the boxes on the streets.
I had some minor objections, but they were stylistic and not to do with substance: there were a few simulated/dramatization scenes that I thought should have been clearly identified as such; I’m not a fan of the ‘watch us make a documentary’ format; and I didn’t like the weird rendition of the Anthem at the end. But I guess those are immaterial and just the product of figuring out how to tell and express the story.
Altogether, I thought it was very well done and effective.