I think the jury should be able to see how sleazy the prosecutors are. But having been on many juries I have concerns about the logical abilities of many that get through the voir dire process. The legal side with no case tries to eliminate those potential jurors that seem to have logical ability. Usually this is the defense attorney, but this time it is the prosecutor.
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1459392363063820288
Zoomed and enhanced. Barrel is down the whole time. Ziminskis target him and Rosenbaum comes up behind. Kyle was running from danger.
.
The fuzz is on your brain Andrea. You never should have hit the send button.
WATCH: FBI IR surveillance footage shows Kyle turn away from the Ziminskis and raise his right arm, same temperature as the rest of his body -
@HumanEvents
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1459349571142889474
The prosecution lied yet again.
The DEMON DEMOCRATS SURE are GREAT at PRODUCING LATE stuff....like this FUZZY DRONE PICTURE AND BALLOTS!
But there is a good shot of Kyle on his butt with the dude aiming his gun right at Kyle and Kyle perceived him as a threat....well duh...
Yesterday there was a discussion as to whether Kyle initiated the violence....but then you hear Kyle was beaten with a skateboard etc etc...It's a stretch...
We have been following and watching. The question the defense never asked and should have asked is “Can individual pixels also be manually edited?”
If the prosecution shows the fuzzy image to the jury in their closing argument, the defense will be able to rebut ‘fuzzy image’ with the clear images of Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse.
Additionally, the defense will be able to point to the many witnesses who talked about Rosenbaum’s words and actions prior to the shooting. Rosenbaum was definitely in an aggressive mood that night.
Actually, it probably will be good to have the prosecutor bring up the ‘fuzzy image’ so the defense can make it very clear to the jury that a ‘fuzzy image’ is the best the prosecution has.
Writing at PJ Media, Victoria Taft explains that, in more bad news for Kyle’s defense, the judge allowed the prosecutors to add several lesser charges to the more serious charges already pending against Kyle.This is disastrous for Kyle because it allows the jurors - who are fully aware of the baying mob that will greet them outside the courthouse and follow them to their homes - to assuage their consciences by finding Kyle guilty of the lesser charges.
He’ll still go to prison but not for life. Of course, once in prison, unless he’s kept in solitary, his life will probably be very short.
What happened to Kyle is just one more piece of the leftist politicization of law in America.
Can the ill logic of this bye presented in closing agreements?
Can the defense remind the jury to review all the photos of Kyle where in every instance he is carrying right handed?
I watched that video 50 times and I never saw Kyle pointing at anyone. I did, however, see someone point a gun at Kyle (I think, far too fuzzy to know for sure).
Let’s review the motives and resulting outcomes for all parties. Look at this and weigh it out.
Anyone caught in the sights of this mindless mob would have been judged as being either with them and escalating or as against them and by default their enemy.
Law enforcement had been neutered by the fake news and democrat courts and now they are after us.
Hands up don’t shoot
Pants up don’t loot
“The problem for Kyle is that, under Wisconsin law (as is the case under most states’ laws), a person who provokes an attack may not then claim self-defense.”
This is a BS argument. I don’t know how it works in Wisconsin but in most states even if there is some initial provocation, if the provocateur then attempts to withdraw, the person who pursues to continue the conflict is the aggressor.
By the Left’s deranged thinking if a person is carrying a Trump flag that is a provocation. So if an AntiFa type tries to kill him with a skateboard and gets shot and killed, its not self defense.
What is the accuracy and validity of the AI technology? You can’t just introduce evidence that relies on an untested or invalid technology.
There was a documentary I saw - probably Forensic Files - in which a woman was murdered and the killer left a fingerprint in blood on her bed. The print was identified by someone developing a new technique. He got the computer to subtract the pattern of the material the print was on, leaving behind a clear print. He demonstrated in court that this technique did not alter the print, and the killer - a neighbor - was convicted.
So the prosecution in this case needs to PROVE that the enhancement didn’t alter the drone image.
A picture captures a 30th of a second. that image represents only what the prosecution can muster... and their assumption that that 30th of a second defines everything.
The Marxist domestic enemies are doing everything they possibly can to railroad and set this kid up. This is another Zimmerman/Trayvon case and if Rittenhouse is acquitted the Marxists in the media will forever portray him as a villain just like they do with Zimmerman.
Think how insane this is: Because they refused to get killed they are prosecuted and persecuted.
It depends on the judge. They had a witness testify that the computer program inserts pixels into a blown up image and they don’t know how the computer guesses at what to put in the photo.