https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1459392363063820288
Zoomed and enhanced. Barrel is down the whole time. Ziminskis target him and Rosenbaum comes up behind. Kyle was running from danger.
If the Ziminskis were pointing out KR and encouraging Rosenbaum to “get him”, then they should be the ones on trial — they seem to have provoked the whole chain of events.
I can see why the prosecutor did not want the Ziminskis on the witness stand — they would illustrate the sort of scary criminal scum that converted protests” into riots. In closing, the Defense should point out to the jury that the Ziminskis were facing the scene and only feet away from where they claim KR was “pointing a rifle”. Yet the State didn’t call them as witnesses. Why was that? Because the Ziminskis DIDN’T see what the State claims, and the State knows it. They want you to use a modified yet still unintelligible video they have doctored as an way for those biased against KR to justify conviction. Does this grainy enhanced photo meet the standard of PROVING BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT Rittenhouse did NOT act in self defense? Obviously not. In addition, video shows Rosenbaum running at KR BEFORE the moment the State erroneously claims KR raised his rifle. An action made AFTER Rosenbaum started charging cannot possibly have provoked Rosenbaum into charging. The State’s whole premise is illogical — they have no case whatsoever and are making things up with shameless cynicism.