Posted on 10/09/2019 2:14:59 PM PDT by Liberty7732
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday said he will send a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) indicating that Senate Republicans will not impeach President Trump over a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, saying she can stop now.
Speaking to Fox News, Graham, who is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he will ask other Senate Republicans to sign a letter to Pelosi that said they do not believe the transcript of the phone call between the president and Ukraine is an impeachable offense.
Theyre about to destroy the nation for no good reason, Graham said. And I want Nancy Pelosi to know that Republican senators are not going to impeach this president based on this transcript, so she can stop now before she destroys the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
TEll Nancy to let the voters decide in 13 months... and not the Democratic Party in the Congress.
“...not an impeachable offense”
It’s not an offense of any kind. It’s a guy doing his job effectively. Though likely that is some kind of offense to Leftist whack jobs.
Graham said. And I want Nancy Pelosi to know that Republican senators are not going to impeach this president ...”
“He would know”
Well Graham should know that the Senate does not impeach a President. :-)
Compromised by her own party. Remember, more than one person has known for a very long time who the whistle blower is...and I have absolutely no doubt that Schiff has known who the WB is......before we even heard of a WB.
BUT THEY ARE PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTION AND NATIONAL SECURITY AND BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, LINDSEY!
Isn’t that up to the MSM?
I’m confused. Just who is in charge of this msm/dem/edu/fbi/cia RESIST coalition aka the Marxists.
Hillary, Obama, Soros?
Since Juan McLame kicked the bucket and quit controlling him, I've grown to like Linda Graham.
I bet he did not consult with Mitt Romney.
Nobody consults with Mitt Romney.
Great! People here hate Graham, but he’s a smart man and very aggressive in his genteel SC way. People in SC like him so thats good.
He didnt like Trump at the start. But neither did a lot of people because Trump was so different. I actually didnt trust him because I thought it was all a pose to get elected. I should have known better...Im from NY and was living there when Trump had his ugly divorces, rebuilt the Wollman Rink with his own money, was one of the leading forces behind the Hudson Yards (opposed by Nadler), etc. So Trump is what he is and what he says he is, and I finally believed this and I think Graham does too. And what Trump is ...is somebody who loves America.
That doesnt mean people cant disagree with Trump on particular issues, and thats perfectly legit. Frankly, I think its Dem trolls here (and there are many) who attack Graham every time his name appears because they want to kick the legs out from anybody who supports Trump on any issue.
It’s not about him actually being removed for his activity.
It’s about trashing him to the extent confused voters remove him.
It’s very revealing how many people state that Trump has ignored the Constitution and has committed and is still committing countless crimes.
None of that is true.
It's been twenty years since Clinton - maybe he forgot which chamber he is in? :)
I am a little hesitant to pile on Graham since he has had a change of position. At the same time he reminds me of Chester from Warner Brothers.
Remember the little dog always bouncing around the bulldog named Spike?
McLame was the bulldog before, but Graham now understands that Trump is the biggest dog of all!
Even so, better Graham than Romney!!!!
I’m with you, but did McCain get Graham mixed up in the Dossier mess? I’m wondering if he had a part in it.
Theyre about to destroy the nation for no good reason,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unlike when Graham tried to destroy the nation with amnesty THREE times.........
Bingo!
I thought that impeachment meant the actual removal from office until a few years ago when I found out different on here.
But i’m not a state senator :)
Nor am I the person to go to for a constitutional issue either :)
A little 18 months ago he was thick as thieves with McTraitor. I remain distrustful. I do think he got a shock of reality with the Rats and Kavenaugh.
A little 18 months ago he was thick as thieves with McTraitor. I remain distrustful. I do think he got a shock of reality with the Rats and Kavenaugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.