Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's official: No U.S. warming since at least 2005
wnd.com ^ | 8/30/2019 | staff

Posted on 08/30/2019 9:27:21 AM PDT by rktman

The difficulty of accurately measuring average temperatures around the globe and across the United States has helped fuel the conflicting claims regarding climate change.

Purveyors of the belief that mankind is catastrophically impacting the global climate insist it's getting warmer year by year.

But a new, improved system to assess surface temperatures established in 2005 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, indicates otherwise.

In fact, the U.S. Climate Reference Network -- comprised of 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states -- finds there has been no warming for the past 14 years at least, noted the Powerline blog.

While historically the U.S. has been considered to have the best records, surveys show that over half of the nation's weather stations do not comply with written standards, pointed out Powerline contributor John Hinderaker.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: climageddon; climalarky; climatechange
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Butt, butt, butt--------hottest on RECORD. Never warmer. We all gonna die in 11.xxx years. Miami will be under water. D.C. will be under water. NYC will be under wat...... Hey, wait a minute. CLIMAGEDDON!!!! More like 'climalarky'.
1 posted on 08/30/2019 9:27:22 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

This hoax should have died a long time ago. It’s amazing to me that people still push it.


2 posted on 08/30/2019 9:30:55 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Black Hole Sun
3 posted on 08/30/2019 9:31:45 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Stop global climate stasis! We’re running out of time!


4 posted on 08/30/2019 9:36:59 AM PDT by thesharkboy (Charter member of the Basket of Deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Obama’s new seaside estate under water!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 08/30/2019 9:37:15 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

OK, Looking for a fact based article to explain the climate debate. Not talking head stuff from Faux or CNN stuff, just climate debate for dummies. Wanting to understand the facts on both sides of argument.

</fireproof underpants on/>


6 posted on 08/30/2019 9:38:12 AM PDT by john316 (JOSHUA 24:15 ...choose you this day whom ye will serve...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
There is absolutely no calculation which will resolve what the temperature should be in the future or was in the past...for every point on the earth.

Man is soooo vain.

7 posted on 08/30/2019 9:38:58 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john316

Read the reviews at Amazon.

8 posted on 08/30/2019 9:45:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

this report will mean nothing, because the satellite folks ‘adjusted’ the results because they claimed that ‘one of the satellites was off target’ and therefore ‘the results couldn’t be trusted’

so essentially what they did was throw out all the readings from that satellite and invent new readings- and walla walla bing bang- they got their warming-

Yes folks, that’s really how blatantly and brazenly they are lying to us now


9 posted on 08/30/2019 9:45:43 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john316

you want facts?

1: Warming always happens first- then hundreds of years later CO2 rises- this is proven with ice core samples and other means- this means CO2 is NOT driving temperatures

2: There is nowhere near enough CO2 in the atmosphere to create a thick blanket of heat trapping CO2- the atmosphere has only got 0.00136% CO2 from man in it- 0.0036% is far too little to be causing even an iota of warming even if CO2 did cause warming- which it doesn’t

3: There are scientific reports stating that oceans have a kind of ‘turn over’ where they spew tons of CO2 out despite there being no warming of the oceans- (The oceans would need to warm to such a degree to spew CO2 that life would not thrive in such hot waters) meaning atmospheric CO2 rises in recent decades are not due to man as claimed by the alarmists- CO2 coming from the oceans is doing so via some other process than warming-

4: CO2 ppm were over 1000 ppm in the past and life still flourished- there is no ‘tipping point’ for CO2- we’re nowhere near what we were in the past- and if anything, we’re in a ‘CO2 starvation’ period

5: Check out climatedepot.org for many many scientific proofs that man isn’t causing climate change

CO2 is NOT driving temperatures- Warming ha happened for many reasons, but CO2 is not one of them


10 posted on 08/30/2019 9:56:05 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: john316

also look up the connection between sun spots and warming- that is where the warmign is coming from- you will find that info on cliamtedepot site-

one m ore point about CO2- science states that volcanoes don’t spew enough CO2 to account for the amount in atmosphere- yet they are finding out that volcano don’t release most the their CO2 during eruption, but afterwards- years later, when the volcanic ash dries out- the CO2 gets released then- creating many tons of CO2- science has underestimated the total amount of CO2 that volcanoes release-

But again, al that is moot- except to counter their arguments that the rise in atmospheric CO2 in past decades ‘must be from man’ - As the world warms from natural means, volcanic ash dries out more, releasing much more CO2- I think science is going to find many more massive sources of natural CO2- because remember, in the past, before the industrial age, levels were over 1000 ppm- it had to come fro m somewhere- and we know for a fact oceans could not have heated up enough to be the sole source or even major source of CO2 back then- life in the seas would have ceased for the seas to have become warmed enough to release that much CO2-

There are loads of facts that prove man isn’t responsible- just gotta dig a little- cliamtedepot is a great starting point- loads of peer reviewed articles there-


11 posted on 08/30/2019 10:04:31 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Ran some numbers to verify the anthropogenic climate-change hoax is a laughable hoax. Climate hoaxers like to pretend that the annual addition of 5,000,000,000 tons of CO2 to our atmosphere is catastrophic. But when one runs the numbers, it works out that 5 B tons is a mere 0.00014% of total atmospheric CO2, which is a mere 0.062% of total atmospheric mass. (The parts-per-million figure of 0.04% of CO2 by volume is just a different perspective.) Whatever way one chooses to look at the "problem", it is clear there is no problem. We would be better off - MUCH better off - if the CO2 concentration by volume was 1500 - 2000 ppm. The CO2 forcings that the hoaxers rage about is a mirage, at best.
12 posted on 08/30/2019 10:20:51 AM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Montana_Sam

You should let people know about this. :-)


13 posted on 08/30/2019 10:24:11 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The informed will never win this argument. Once the data becomes too overwhelming to hide, the greenies will step up and shout that only through their drive to push change were they able to reverse the course of nature...

...and then they’ll demand more money to continue the path of their “success”.


14 posted on 08/30/2019 10:40:08 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Writing grants now. LOL!


15 posted on 08/30/2019 10:43:25 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Meanwhile in East Tennessee, we had September in July and perhaps the coolest summer in memory

The high on Laborday will be a scorching 75


16 posted on 08/30/2019 10:45:52 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As you can imagine, the data is freely available. NASA has a page with some of the stats. Also, calculating the mass of the atmosphere is fairly straight forward. I used 4000 miles for the radius of the earth, and 15 #/sq in for the weight of the atmosphere. Both figures are close enough for proof-of-concept work. Several sites post the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere both by volume (0.04%) and mass (0.06%). But people like to be stoned and stupid and subject to the thieving carnival barkers and shills and shellmen.


17 posted on 08/30/2019 10:52:01 AM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Montana_Sam

Show me the money is all they want.


18 posted on 08/30/2019 10:59:03 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
A pretty exhaustive resource for climate change scholarship is the Climatology discussion on applet-magic.com.

You have not mentioned water vapor as a contributor to global warming/cooling, but this researcher believes that it's a major contributor to the discussion.

There are many analyses on this site. Much of it is scientific, but enough of it can be absorbed by laymen to form a powerful case.

19 posted on 08/30/2019 11:02:25 AM PDT by poconopundit (Will Kamel Harass pay reparations? Her ancestors were black Slave Owners in Jamaica.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman
...In fact, the U.S. Climate Reference Network -- comprised of 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states...one of the numerous basic methodological problems with the whole "climate change" fantasy - exactly how and where do you take the measurements that are supposed to represent the climate for the whole earth - even 114 stations in an area as vast as continental US is meaningless - how do they register accurately long term tendencies from short term influences such as fronts, storms (Dorian comes to mind), and temporary afflictions like the "Dust Bowl" anomaly - the hottest temperature reached by several degrees in Philly was way back in 1898 - were it one of these pristine weather stations, we'd be talking about global cooling......
20 posted on 08/30/2019 11:17:37 AM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson