Butt, butt, butt--------hottest on RECORD. Never warmer. We all gonna die in 11.xxx years. Miami will be under water. D.C. will be under water. NYC will be under wat...... Hey, wait a minute. CLIMAGEDDON!!!! More like 'climalarky'.
1 posted on
08/30/2019 9:27:22 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
This hoax should have died a long time ago. It’s amazing to me that people still push it.
2 posted on
08/30/2019 9:30:55 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: rktman
To: rktman
Stop global climate stasis! We’re running out of time!
4 posted on
08/30/2019 9:36:59 AM PDT by
thesharkboy
(Charter member of the Basket of Deplorables)
To: rktman
Obama’s new seaside estate under water!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5 posted on
08/30/2019 9:37:15 AM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: rktman
There is absolutely no calculation which will resolve what the temperature should be in the future or was in the past...for every point on the earth.
Man is soooo vain.
To: rktman
this report will mean nothing, because the satellite folks ‘adjusted’ the results because they claimed that ‘one of the satellites was off target’ and therefore ‘the results couldn’t be trusted’
so essentially what they did was throw out all the readings from that satellite and invent new readings- and walla walla bing bang- they got their warming-
Yes folks, that’s really how blatantly and brazenly they are lying to us now
9 posted on
08/30/2019 9:45:43 AM PDT by
Bob434
To: rktman
Ran some numbers to verify the anthropogenic climate-change hoax is a laughable hoax. Climate hoaxers like to pretend that the annual addition of 5,000,000,000 tons of CO2 to our atmosphere is catastrophic. But when one runs the numbers, it works out that 5 B tons is a mere 0.00014% of total atmospheric CO2, which is a mere 0.062% of total atmospheric mass. (The parts-per-million figure of 0.04% of CO2 by volume is just a different perspective.) Whatever way one chooses to look at the "problem", it is clear there is no problem. We would be better off - MUCH better off - if the CO2 concentration by volume was 1500 - 2000 ppm. The CO2 forcings that the hoaxers rage about is a mirage, at best.
12 posted on
08/30/2019 10:20:51 AM PDT by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
To: rktman
The informed will never win this argument. Once the data becomes too overwhelming to hide, the greenies will step up and shout that only through their drive to push change were they able to reverse the course of nature...
...and then theyll demand more money to continue the path of their success.
To: rktman
Meanwhile in East Tennessee, we had September in July and perhaps the coolest summer in memory
The high on Laborday will be a scorching 75
16 posted on
08/30/2019 10:45:52 AM PDT by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: rktman
...In fact, the U.S. Climate Reference Network -- comprised of 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states...one of the numerous basic methodological problems with the whole "climate change" fantasy - exactly how and where do you take the measurements that are supposed to represent the climate for the whole earth - even 114 stations in an area as vast as continental US is meaningless - how do they register accurately long term tendencies from short term influences such as fronts, storms (Dorian comes to mind), and temporary afflictions like the "Dust Bowl" anomaly - the hottest temperature reached by several degrees in Philly was way back in 1898 - were it one of these pristine weather stations, we'd be talking about global cooling......
To: rktman
21 posted on
08/30/2019 11:17:39 AM PDT by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: rktman
23 posted on
08/30/2019 11:27:04 AM PDT by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson