Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Executives Regret Firing Roseanne, Fear ‘Connors’ Spin-Off Series will Flop
Breitbart ^ | 10/12/2018 | Ben Kew

Posted on 10/12/2018 6:40:56 AM PDT by Drew68

Executives at ABC now believe that their decision to fire Roseanne Barr from their revival of Roseanne was a mistake and the network’s spin-off series The Conners may flop, according to a report from Mail Online. Two senior executives at the network told the outlet that ABC President Channing Dungey’s decision to immediately fire the actress and cancel her show after she made racially charged comments about former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett was a “knee-jerk” decision that they would later regret.

“We didn’t think it through properly. What Roseanne did was wrong but we shouldn’t have rushed to fire her. It was almost a knee-jerk reaction by Ben [Sherwood] and Channing [Dungey] who should have launched an investigation,” one insider reportedly said. “This would have given them more time to listen to the public, advertisers and cast members to determine the best decision.”

Barr compared Jarrett to if the ‘Muslim brotherhood & Planet of the Apes had a baby,” comments that were condemned by Dungey as “abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values.” Yet one insider apparently suggested that ABC should instead have temporarily suspended her before making a final decision.

“They could’ve suspended her from the first few episodes without pay and had her return later on in the season,” the source explained. “I mean the season finale saw Roseanne going to the hospital for knee surgery. While they worked out her fate, her character could have faced serious complications and fought for her life, while simultaneously making Roseanne fight for her career with a national apology tour. “

“The morning the racist tweet scandal blew up, Roseanne offered to publicly apologize and do the rounds of every show but Ben and Channing weren’t having any of that and wanted her gone,” they continued.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abc; abcsucks; bensherwood; buyersremorse; channingdungey; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; dopeydems; duh; flop; haha; hollywood; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; roseanne; roseannebarr; smearmachine; theconners; theconnors; valeriejarrett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: Howie66

They’re trying to make a version of “Roseanne” without Roseanne. I can’t believe no executive has stopped this and told them how stupid an idea that is.


21 posted on 10/12/2018 6:51:22 AM PDT by jyo19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Rosanne won’t come back. If she did, it wouldn’t be the same. She robustly exercised her right to free speech. It wouldn’t be so robust now.


22 posted on 10/12/2018 6:52:07 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is what I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

“ABC President Channing Dungey’s...”

Channing Dung....name theory.


23 posted on 10/12/2018 6:52:10 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

They made a huge mistake not only firing Roseanne, but killing off her character.


24 posted on 10/12/2018 6:52:35 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Yes. Trump’s “tweets of vindication!” Wonder which will tank first, Conners or Murphy Brown.


25 posted on 10/12/2018 6:52:36 AM PDT by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Dumbasses.

It WILL FLOP!....................


26 posted on 10/12/2018 6:52:52 AM PDT by Red Badger (Q............BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Valerie Jarrett is white to me.


27 posted on 10/12/2018 6:53:21 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 - put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Of course it’ll flop. It doesn’t have Rosanne. I can’t wait for her show to premiere. One idea would be to have the entire cast of characters played by a new cast and pick up where it left off. Or, have her living a new life, several years down the road, divorced, remarried and her grandkids are living with her because her kids are in prison or living in a cult something.


28 posted on 10/12/2018 6:53:33 AM PDT by FrdmLvr (They never thought she would lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist

DUH popped into my mind immediately, too. Stupid jerks!


29 posted on 10/12/2018 6:54:26 AM PDT by Exit148 ( (Loose Change Club founder) Put yours aside for the next Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Like running ‘I Love Lucy’ without Lucy.


30 posted on 10/12/2018 6:54:34 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Bring “Roseanne” to FOX. Easy Peasy.


31 posted on 10/12/2018 6:54:37 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (Grace and Dignity Will Win The Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

... What Roseanne did was wrong but we shouldn’t have rushed to fire her..

Lunatic liberals would accept nothing less.


32 posted on 10/12/2018 6:55:13 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

How DARE you make such a sensible and logical suggestion!
:)!


33 posted on 10/12/2018 6:56:11 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Bring “Roseanne” to FOX. Easy Peasy.

It would have to be an entirely new show and format because her co-stars all threw her under the bus.

34 posted on 10/12/2018 6:57:26 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

The Bush Rule is in effect big time.
“Pissing off your Base is not a winning strategy”


35 posted on 10/12/2018 6:58:06 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Of course no one is going to tune in... Not only does the show not work without “ROSEANNE”.. for crying out loud that was the name of the show.... BUT... the way you handled her and fired here within an hour over far less than other actors in many of your shows routinely.... means a good bit of folks are DOUBLY unwilling to tune in...

My bet, probably some curiosity ratings... up front then into the toilet.

If they are smart, they will turn the whole she died into a dream, and bring it back and pretend the conners never happened.....

Of course if they were smart, they would have thought a bit more up front rather than just the knee jerk firing in the first place..


36 posted on 10/12/2018 6:59:27 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

It can be done. Make it for Friday night.


37 posted on 10/12/2018 7:00:19 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (Grace and Dignity Will Win The Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Joe Rogan (who has stuck by Roseanne without flinching) has a great interview with her this week. She’s nuts, she’s wonderful and unique.


38 posted on 10/12/2018 7:01:05 AM PDT by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I would love to see Roseanne create a series of her own, based on the original model. It would start with her waking up from a dream, as part of an entirely new family. The old family was just a bad dream. Just a thought...


39 posted on 10/12/2018 7:01:45 AM PDT by JWNM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Idea. Rosanne as gov of cal surrounded by libs and snowflakes


40 posted on 10/12/2018 7:02:03 AM PDT by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson