Posted on 03/27/2016 9:47:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus mocked Hillary Clinton's "embarrassing performance" in primaries and caucuses this week, chortling at her poor one-of-six wins.
"Hillary Clinton's repeated stumbles at this stage of the race are another reminder of her deeply flawed candidacy. Winning only one out of six primaries and caucuses this week is an embarrassing performance for the Democrat front runner," he said in a statement Sunday.
Clinton this week won the Arizona primary and lost to challenger Sen. Bernie Sanders in Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii and Washington.
"At a time when the public's concern about terrorism is growing, Hillary Clinton's glaring record of failure on fighting terrorism and her decision to set up a secret email server shows she recklessly jeopardized national security and can't be trusted in the White House. Americans looking for new leadership will not get it from two candidates promising to rubber stamp more of the extreme Obama agenda. Only a Republican president will offer the course correction our country badly needs," he added.
She’s a lousy candidate. She’s a despicable human being and arguably a more active traitor than even 0bama. But if she’s the candidate, she could win the election the way things are sputtering and spinning.
She’s a lousy candidate. She’s a despicable human being and arguably a more active traitor than even 0bama. But if she’s the candidate, she could win the election the way things are sputtering and spinning.
Absent the superdelegates and Wall Street money she would never be able to beat Sanders.
But if those things were gone, there would be twenty other Democrats still in the race.
Don't worry, they're trying real hard.
Trump is losing to Shrillary? How do you determine that? Are you referring to the 1980 election when Carter was ahead of Reagan in the polls by 30 points in April yet lost by 10 points in November? Using that logic, if Trump is only 10 points behind Shrillary in the polls today, then he is already ahead of Reagan's pace by 20 points and should cream Shrillary by 30 points in November.
Did you even read the article? Ted Cruz isn’t even mentioned
cough, cough
No I mean 2016 polls
You are spinning. Of course we are not going to have Reagan vs. Carter polls in 2016. But in 1980, establishment Republicans were using those same head-to-head polls, that were showing Carter ahead of Reagan by 30 points, to tell us that nominating Reagan would be a grave mistake. We know the rest of the story.
But because if Hillary is physically deteriorating just under the stresses of a powder-puff coronation campaign, she will likely not last 6 months alive in office before the stress gives her a stroke.
And that would give us a President who had never held a job until age 40, and who had *honeymooned* in the Soviet Union, _during_ the Cold War.
I’m viewing this dem race as another version of the scripted WWE performance, where the designated winner keeps getting slammed, only to mount an amazing comeback for the final pin.
Wouldn’t hurt. Bernie’s so old he has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel, so the Clinton machine could surely arrange a credible demise for him mid-term, and plant someone of their own ilk in the VP spot.
Why, you’re shocked, you tell me, absolutely shocked.
Explain "plantation vote".
the blacks on the democrat plantation, along with the Hispanics on the same democrat plantation.
He’d be a terrible choice. It might excite some hardcore people like Palin excited the Republican base but he does more harm to the ticket. Drags her left, she needs the center. He’s old and not charismatic.
Makes sense for her to go with a Latino to try to get illegals to turn out for her. Julian Castro. She needs Black and Hispanic turnout to win in November, Bernie does nothing for them, she’s killing him in those demos.
Yet quiet over 1-9 Cruz wins. I wish they’d hit him too.
Well, indeed, there is that.
You are spinning
Nope
But in 1980, establishment Republicans were using those same head-to-head polls, that were showing Carter ahead of Reagan by 30 points, to tell us that nominating Reagan would be a grave mistake. We know the rest of the story.
This isn’t 1980. I was there. BHO has a >50% JAR. No gas lines, no Iranian Hostage crisis,no out of control inflation, Carter was just seen as weak. Nobody believed Carter was a crook.
The fact that Trump is disliked more and is loosing to someone who 60% believe is crooked should give those who support Trump some pause. It means he’s gonna have alot of work and changing to do if he wants to win in Nov.
So yes, as of now, he is losing to Hillary
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.