Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

....and they promise to garnish Democrats and Republicans equally.

Wait....many Democrats don't have wages?

Someone, PLEASE tell me that a revolution is close at hand.

By-the-way, thank Richard Nixon for the EPA.

1 posted on 07/09/2014 6:53:58 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: blam

More out of control Nazism.


2 posted on 07/09/2014 6:56:06 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

For the list.


3 posted on 07/09/2014 6:56:46 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Nixon enabled the EPA by executive order.
(Notice the ‘non-Federal wages’ distinction?)


4 posted on 07/09/2014 6:56:46 AM PDT by griswold3 (I was born here in America. I will die here in a third world country. Obama succeeded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I can’t wait for it to start...no matter how it turns out.


5 posted on 07/09/2014 6:56:48 AM PDT by x1stcav ("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Wouldn’t that violate the “takings clause” of the Constitution.


6 posted on 07/09/2014 6:59:44 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

There are so many people....there won’t be enough gallows and piano wire.


7 posted on 07/09/2014 7:00:33 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Another agency that has been comandeered by the current occupant of the oval office.


8 posted on 07/09/2014 7:00:46 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

They’re just going to “borrow” the power.


9 posted on 07/09/2014 7:01:06 AM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

And the beat goes on.


11 posted on 07/09/2014 7:03:59 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Just what is the real reason to disarm a law abiding citizen like me, ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Actually, the EPA has always had the power to take everything you have if you have violated the rules/regulations.

I recall that being one of the lessons they touched on when I received my EHS Degree. That the EPA can come after the company, which is what they usually do for the deep pockets, but they can come after the individual as well.

And if you want to really get freaked out about the agency’s ability to do this...consider if someone contaminated some land, sold it to you, you sold it to someone else and decades later they ‘discover’ the contamination. You and everyone in the chain-of-custody can be held liable.

All without ever having to set foot in a true court of law.

Have a great day now!


13 posted on 07/09/2014 7:05:27 AM PDT by EBH (And the head wound was healed, and Gog became man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

If an obscure government agency can destroy a football team over its name, then certainly, ANY government agency feels it has the right to take your money.

The Federal Government is out of control.


14 posted on 07/09/2014 7:08:46 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Is there a link to where or how we can give our ‘feedback’ to the EPA?

Maybe FR could organize a contest for the most creative feedback delivered to the EPA... anyone game?

3


15 posted on 07/09/2014 7:09:30 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
hello ?

who ?

the EPA ?

yeah ... waddaya want ?

you want me to take joe's pay and send it to you ?

ok, i'll get right on it

16 posted on 07/09/2014 7:09:53 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
unless the agency receives enough adverse public comments by August 1.

Here's a comment.

F-you...

18 posted on 07/09/2014 7:11:05 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“The notice went on to say that the EPA had fast-tracked the new rule, enabling it to take effect September 2 unless the agency receives enough adverse public comments by August 1. The EPA said the rule was not subject to review because it was not a “significant regulatory action.”

Better start sending in those comments...

I went to the EPA page, but couldn’t find where we can comment on this.

If someone know the link could you please post where we can comment on this specific plan.

http://www.epa.gov/


19 posted on 07/09/2014 7:13:01 AM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The EPA must be defunded immediately. Then a move to reorganize the EPA. A better use of America's resources must be the primary function with the people usage first most.
20 posted on 07/09/2014 7:13:46 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The notice went on to say that the EPA had fast-tracked the new rule, enabling it to take effect September 2 unless the agency receives enough adverse public comments by August 1. The EPA said the rule was not subject to review because it was not a "significant regulatory action."

Can 'we the people' fast track our own rules and cite some arbitrary date in which objections must be made by? If so, instead of garnishing wages, I'm making the following rule; all forms of taxation are no longer compulsory and will instead be treated as philanthropic gestures which must be acknowledged with a hand-written 'thank-you' note, signed by all members of Congress . All objections to my rule must be sent by certified mail, to my home by 12:00 noon, today.

21 posted on 07/09/2014 7:16:43 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

In the beginning the EPA did good stuff by cleaning up rivers esp. the East River in New York. For the first time there’s fish in it. It grew into the monolith it is today under Democrat rule.


24 posted on 07/09/2014 7:19:15 AM PDT by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read newspapers you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Since CO2 is now a pollutant according to the EPA and I exhale the stuff does that mean I’m a polluter and should be fined? Can they garnish my paychecks as a result for exhaling?


25 posted on 07/09/2014 7:20:29 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Due process be damned....................


27 posted on 07/09/2014 7:22:28 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've posted a total of 2,756 threads and 85,113 replies................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson