EBH
Since Oct 24, 2004

view home page, enter name:
Imperfect vaccines could make viruses more dangerous, (2015) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/07/27/leaky-vaccines-could-make-viruses-more-deadly-new-study-suggests/

‘Leaky’ Vaccines Can Produce Stronger Versions of Viruses (5/2019 pre-Covid) https://www.healthline.com/health-news/leaky-vaccines-can-produce-stronger-versions-of-viruses-072715

Risk of ‘leaky’ vaccines debated (7/2015) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.349.6247.461

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 Maccabees 6:12-16 Providential Significance of Persecution

Now I urge those who read this book not to be depressed by such calamities, but to recognize these punishments were designed not to destroy but to discipline our people. In fact not to let the impious alone for long, but to punish them immediately, is a sign of great kindness. For in the case of the other nations the Lord waits patiently until they have reached the full measure of their sins, but He does not deal this way with us. In order to take vengeance on us afterward when our sins have reached their height. Therefore he never withdraws His mercy from us. Though he disciplines us with calamities, He does not forsake His own people.

Democrats Deny God 3 Times DNC 2012

If one really digs and searches you will find an interesting trail of breadcrumbs that lead from the early 2003ish to today and this virus. Basically though it starts under President Obama and the loss of control at several of our very own labs. The loss of control at the labs triggers Obama to place a moratorium on “gain of function,” experiments. Those specific experiments involved coronavirus. In 2017, the NIH lifts the ban. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/12/nih-lifts-3-year-ban-funding-risky-virus-studies Now we know Fauci worked as an AIDs expert back in the day. I recently found several interesting old interviews that set off a few red flags. You can read them for yourself. https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0102-10 “If you’re talking about a vaccine that’s truly useful and will have a substantial impact on the epidemic it’s going to be more than three years. The most you can hope for by then might be a vaccine to protect against disease progression rather than infection.” Fauci https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd2491 These really read like he’s talking about the vaccines we are using right now against cornovirus, which has a HIV component. Fauci and the Wuhan Lab Fauci had been working on gain of function experiments when the Obama ban took place. We know America funded the Wuhan lab and even trained the personnel. In 2014, the NIH approved a grant to EcoHealth Alliance designated for research into “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” The project involved collaborating with researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study coronaviruses in bats and the risk of potential transfer to humans. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/05/04/fact-check-obama-administration-did-not-send-3-7-m-wuhan-lab/3061490001/ WAIT!!! What? At about the time we BANNED such research here in the United States, Obama approved a 5 year grant to specifically study....SARS? So, as China makes claims we are responsible for this virus may be partially true as it is obviously true this virus of a gain of function experiment came from the Wuhan Lab.

There was never full confidence in any particular year’s iteration of the Influenza vaccine. Nobody who received the vaccine ever felt bullet proof against contracting Influenza because they’d been vaccinated against it. The reason for this is that the Inflenza virus mutates constantly and thus always remains a moving target. One year the vaccine more or less hits the target squarely, the next it deals it a glancing blow, and the next, misses it entirely. In this way, any Coronavirus germ is the same as any Influenza germ. Constantly mutating. That being so, your statement “There is no confidence in this vaccine.” is simultaneously true, and also somewhat besides the point.

Vaccines against Smallpox and Measles, by comparison, and for that matter Polio too, were developed without that built-in disadvantage. The respective virions that cause those three diseases never mutate. Therefore, there was no moving target, year after year. Effectiveness was darned near 100 percent and remained that high as time passed so all three diseases were soon more or less totally extirpated from life in all first world countries.

The thing is...the vaccines for those diseases never brought serious side effects or death at anything like the rates at which the mRNA gene manipulation injections are currently doing. And those diseases were far more grave and frightening than COVID-19. So, back in the day, people were asked to receive a vaccine that was far less potentially dangerous to their health and lives but with a realistic expectation of 100% effectiveness against a disease that was far more terrifying disease than COVID-19, with a basic promise of immunity for life.

By contrast, now, people are on the verge of being forced to receive an injection or series of injections that is far more potentially dangerous to their health and very lives, with a “who the hell knows” percent effectiveness that is sure to vary year to year against a disease that is a mewling kitten in comparison to the roaring tigers that were Smallpox, Measles and Polio, with no satisfactory promise of any reliable immunity to anyone for any period of time at all! And they wonder what is causing people to [air quotes] hesitate? Compared to the products brought to us by the likes of Jonas Salk and his ilk, Pfizer and ModeRNA’s highly-touted mRNA injections are a collective pig-in-a-poke.

34 posted on 5/11/2021, 3:02:03 AM by one guy in new jersey [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse]