Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protesters across globe rally against Monsanto - GMO
Associates Press ^ | May 25, 2013

Posted on 05/26/2013 8:26:53 AM PDT by opentalk

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Protesters rallied in dozens of cities Saturday as part of a global protest against seed giant Monsanto and the genetically modified food it produces, organizers said.

Organizers said "March Against Monsanto" protests were held in 52 countries and 436 cities, including Los Angeles where demonstrators waved signs that read "Real Food 4 Real People" and "Label GMOs, It's Our Right to Know."

… The U.S. Senate this week overwhelmingly rejected a bill that would allow states to require labeling of genetically modified foods.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activists; aerosalspraying; agenda21; animalfeed; bannedineu; billgate; bt; bttoxin; cancer; changesdna; chemicalsoup; choice; clintons; coloncancer; corruption; crime; dna; dummydownhumans; emptyfood; environment; environmentalwackos; eugenics; fastandfurious; fda; foodsupply; frankenstein; friendofearth; gates; geoengineering; globalists; gmo; gmooprotectionact; greenpeace; greens; health; hfcs; hormonedisruptors; humanity; humanitycrime; immunesystem; infertility; irreversible; kidneydisease; killingbees; labelgmo; leftisttargets; luddites; michaeltaylor; millionmoonbatmarch; monopoly; monsanto; monsantoprotest; msmcensorshipgmo; needlongtermdata; neurotoxins; nohumanstudies; nondisclosure; nostudieschildren; notrust; nwo; obama; obesity; patentonfood; peacelovedope; profitsfromcancer; roundup; saftey; sierraclub; soros; starvationnow; statedepartment; sterilization; tyranny; usurpedgovernment; worldwideprotest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2013 8:26:53 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: opentalk

But the same folks don’t have a problem using food for fuel.


2 posted on 05/26/2013 8:32:40 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Obviously they’ve been drinking the GM kool aid for years already.


3 posted on 05/26/2013 8:33:41 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

21st Century No-nothings.


4 posted on 05/26/2013 8:34:41 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Why Do G .M.O.’s Need Protection?

… Monsanto.....or at least its friends, recently managed to have an outrageous rider slipped into the 587-page funding bill Congress sent to President Obama.

The rider essentially prohibits the Department of Agriculture from stopping production of any genetically engineered crop once it’s in the ground, even if there is evidence that it is harmful.

That’s a pre-emptive Congressional override of the judicial system, since it is the courts that are most likely to ask the U.S.D.A. to halt planting or harvest of a particular crop.

5 posted on 05/26/2013 8:43:13 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Chemical’s the new food group.


6 posted on 05/26/2013 8:45:14 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

They must not be the no/low info voters we’ve heard so much about. Apparently they are the wrong info voters.


7 posted on 05/26/2013 8:47:51 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

What does the nobility (Husseins, etc.) care? Apparently, when they’re not shoveling junk food into their troughs, they have their slaves prepare only organic food.


8 posted on 05/26/2013 8:51:35 AM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Why are you here posting?

Shouldn't you be marching with the rest of the clowns?

9 posted on 05/26/2013 8:54:07 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Amazing how the left has demonized Monsanto. There are scores, probably hundreds, of companies developing GM seeds around the world. Demonizing just one of them is classic Alinskyism in action.

I would have hoped that most people here would know better.


10 posted on 05/26/2013 8:56:41 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
They would rather let Africans and Asians starve then modify food. Sometimes I wonder if starvation isn't the real left wing agenda.
11 posted on 05/26/2013 8:58:05 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

The same people favor the biggest federal government possible ... without which Monsanto, ADM and others would not exist because they get so many subsidies and favored tax status, exclusions from lawsuits, etc.


12 posted on 05/26/2013 9:00:03 AM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Yep. They would not be able to be such a huge company and monopolize the market without big federal government bully protection from competition.


13 posted on 05/26/2013 9:01:38 AM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

The words “Genetically Modified” terrify ignorant leftists....they haven’t a clue.


14 posted on 05/26/2013 9:06:25 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Piffle....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
What subsidies does Monsanto get?

What is their favored tax status?

What makes you think they can't be sued?

15 posted on 05/26/2013 9:10:39 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
some comments at the link

...Not only GMO's, but Monsanto has the 'terminator seed'. This seed produces a plant with no viable seed to reuse for the following year. This seed is sold primarily in 3rd work regions desperate for food. AND - Here in the USA Monsanto patrols the heartland looking for farmers trying to reuse the seed they bought. Farmers are hit heavy with fines if they save seed for the next year. Monsanto has bought many small seed companies and now controls a large market share of our food supply. Follow their rules, or pay

... Monsanto seeds require the application of the Round-up chemicals to activate features; this way farmers have to buy the seeds AND the chemicals to spray on them!

16 posted on 05/26/2013 9:11:46 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

more from link

... if GM seeds are no big deal then why all the fuss against labeling? Why not let consumers make their own choice? Why spend nearly $6 million on lobbying for the "Monsanto Protection Act," which was written anonymously, passed in secret, and allows Monsanto to keep selling genetically engineered seeds even if a federal court says they may pose a health risk?..

17 posted on 05/26/2013 9:14:40 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Monsanto has bought worldwide influence to prevent anyone from questioning them in a legal forum.

If they are so proud of their gmo crops, why are they afraid to label it in stores?

Let everyone who wants to eat gmo crops do so knowingly. Let everyone who wants to avoid eating gmo crops have the knowledge to do so. Seems fair.

Around here, an Amish farmer threw some gmo corn out by the edge of the woods and even the dear won’t eat it... If they don’t want it, I sure don’t.


18 posted on 05/26/2013 9:17:49 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Gone rogue, gone Galt, gone international, gone independent. Gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
... if GM seeds are no big deal then why all the fuss against labeling? Why not let consumers make their own choice?

I've had this discussion on here before. The answer was, essentially, "Adding a small label that says 'GMO' would be far too burdensome on companies and drive them out of business."

So now we know.

19 posted on 05/26/2013 9:18:16 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Corporate owned and manufactured food supply is a bad thing. The primary source of our physical health is nutrition which must be supplied through food.

I am very uncomfortable allowing increased centralization and control of food supplies by uber-corporations.

Food supplies like politics is best controlled at the local level.

20 posted on 05/26/2013 9:21:46 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson