Posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS FOR PRESIDENT!!
This message is intended for those posters on FR who seem to have missed my prior statements in this regard and insist on advocating for these bastards.
I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!
Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!! And I don't care how long you've been here!!
Well..you know I like you little jeremiah and if you didn’t, you do now. I appreciate your thoughtful post. I feel sorry for Dick Cheney on this issue and don’t think he is a ‘fool’...he is just a father who loves his daughter. He should have kept it in the family and not come out publicly in favor of gay marriage, though I imagine the media made that an impossible task. They love these ‘wedge’ issues because they seek to divide and conquer.
No no no!
I was being a twerp and scolding you for an apparent dislike for being the target of libs!
Welcome the heat;
Relish the heat,
don't complain about the heat!
Perhaps them Libs will spontaneously combust in the HEAT!
Do you know what this symbol is:
It's called a QUESTION MARK, that indicates that I am ASKING about your thought process.
So, let's try it again:
So, you think the definition of conservatism should somehow embrace sodomy?What about bestiality?
How about polygamy?
Is incest a conservative position?
You will see that ALL of these are questions. Are you able to answer them?
It seemed that way to me, too.
That's why I'm still here.
I hope you help her and tell her that she needs to wake up and that what she is doing could hurt her.
Yup. I think only the libertarians think it was libertarian. ;-)
What do think of the Patriot Act? Seems we have a house divide here at FR on the issue.
Your insults to DJMacWoW are so off based, untrue and offensive that I take them personally. Your statement “that some of the most vocal anti-homosexual posters here have gay family members” is not only ignorant and ill-informed but snidely insinuating that those who are vocally against the homosexual agenda have messed up personal motivations.
NOPE, NOT WELCOME.
HA HA
I did not know that, LOL I guarantee Ive been mentioned then and I couldn’t careless because I know they would not ave the guts to say anything to my face which in my book makes them a coward
Maybe the poster thinks that being scared spitless for a loved ones longevity and health is "messed up".
Oh..I remember getting an invite a few years ago in FReepmail now.I forgot all about it. I was afraid someone was posting in my moniker somewhere on some gay site or something....LOL!
They(some homosexual activists) were all after me years ago when I helped expose the whole Foleygate crap and that sicko gay idiot Mike Rodgers that was all over TV blackmailing people that may or may have not been gay republicans. He and others like him have a whole gay mafia machine in the works. Real nasty souls..the lot of them.
What do you think my position is on those subjects?
Tru Blewers particularly hate the regulars on the homosexual agenda threads. I’m sure you’ve been noticed. LOL
It’s not about agreeing 100% on 100% of the issues. There are no two people who agree 100% on 100% of all issues.
What it is stating is that if you push non-conservative values and candidates here, that are pushing agendas that are not conservative, and family-oriented, it’s not going to go on very long before it’s shut down.
And the examples he listed are hardly gray-area issues.
Abortion. It is not a conservative position to support abortion. No gray area. It is literally life or death of people.
The Homosexual Agenda. It is not conservative to be pro-homosexual, pro-sodomy, pro-pervert. It is offensive and vulgar that they try to equate what they are trying to pass off with abnormal and twisted pairings of people to say they are “families” just as equal and good as the biblical family structure.
Big government. It is not conservative to want ever increasing, ever controlling, ever intrusive state and federal governments. More and more agencies and bureaus and units that are unelected and unaccountable that do not give two sh1ts about the problems they create for citizens with no threat of reprimand or removal for abuses of power. It is not conservative to support such governments that hate the successful, use the tax code to punish that success and legally take their earnings and give to pet protected classes they do like. It is not conservative to be pro-socialist, pro-marxist, pro-communist much less be supporting any policies these ideologies promote at their core. It is why crony capitalism is despised by true conservatives, because that is just targeted, preferential socialism (fascism).
So when someone who runs a conservative, family oriented site says they aren’t going to support candidates who do not adhere to conservative positions on these issues, or let their site be used to bolster these types of candidates, why are you surprised such a statement would be made by the site owner?
The True Blue thing was last year but it may be the same people trying to recruit posters. I don’t honestly know how long their board has been running.
Check your freepmail!
My guess is that there are also Freepers who have alcoholic family members, drug addict family members, kleptomaniac family members and family members who engage in all kinds of behavioral disorders. People who have family members like that and care about them do their best to encourage them back to a life of normalcy. Those who ignore that behavior or smile and wish them luck with their sickness are either cowards, or don't give a damn about them.
And how about supporters of amnesty for illegal aliens?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
