Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snub for Obamas as Royal sources reveal they will not be invited to Prince William's wedding
Mail Online ^ | December 17, 2010 | FAY SCHLESINGER

Posted on 12/17/2010 7:21:12 AM PST by katieanna

President Obama and his wife Michelle will not be invited to Prince William's wedding next year. Because Prince William is not yet heir to the throne, his wedding to Kate Middleton is not classed as a ‘state occasion’ – and the couple feel under no pressure to fill the 2,000-strong guest list with heads of state, the Mail understands. They are more eager to ask ordinary citizens and charity workers than foreign dignitaries and VIPs to what will be the first royal ‘people’s wedding’, courtiers suggested. A handful of heads of state are likely to be invited in line with previous royal weddings, possibly including France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife Carla Bruni.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339315/President-Obama-snubbed-sources-reveal-invited-Prince-Williams-wedding.html#ixzz18Niyt5qd

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: england; hrhwilliam; nobama; obama; qe2; usuk; yobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Mercat

Nooo... the vision-impaired prime minister got the DVDs. The queen I think got an ipad with Obama’s favorite show tunes, and copies of his speeches. There was also something about a plastic helicopter from the WH gift shop.

But the most outrageous part is where mooch-elle put her hands all over the Queen. Then that man went off and gave profound bows to every other monarch he met, esp his patron the King of Araby, but not the Queen. She just gets to get scared (80+ y.o. woman) by a big mean black woman. Sort of like that man’s own grandmother admitting she was scared when accosted by aggressive panhandlers of color.


81 posted on 12/17/2010 8:55:10 AM PST by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice
Exactly. The Queen, being the Queen, could not slap Michelle's face around to the back of her head, tempting though it may have been.

The royals are under no obligation whatsoever, though, to invite either of the Obamas to a wedding. Why should they invite yet another assault on the Queen's person?

At the time the "back-pat" faux pas occurred, I wondered if Michelle had refused to be briefed by the State Department's etiquette experts or what, but the more I thought about it, I decided that it was probably a deliberate thing. An expression of contempt, perhaps, for the British and their royalty in particular, in keeping with the return of the Churchill bust and the "gifts" they gave.

"We can do what we want to do!"

82 posted on 12/17/2010 9:02:04 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MyIndianNameIsSwimsWithSharks
sniff, sniff............

Got Ozone?

83 posted on 12/17/2010 9:08:32 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

1) I agree with your understanding of the royal family’s means of support. People in America ought too ‘eff off. This country forfeited its right to criticize the way England conducts her affairs when they threw off their rightful Lord and Sovereign, George III.

2) That 200 million may have been exaggerated. However, we know they spent like there was no tomorrow and we HATE that here. We also know they THINK they’re royalty, but they’re really just boorish unamerican prats.


84 posted on 12/17/2010 9:08:53 AM PST by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Who snubbed who? The Obamas have gone out of their way to treat the Brits like crap. This is simply payback.


85 posted on 12/17/2010 9:09:36 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

The last thing they probably would have wanted would be to have to go to that, but you can rest assured that teacups are being hurled over the fact that they were disinvited.


86 posted on 12/17/2010 9:12:04 AM PST by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
I would not want those crass, unenlightened and decorum breaking boors to come to my wedding. I wouldn't even let the pigs back into my country.

LLS

87 posted on 12/17/2010 9:12:47 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyIndianNameIsSwimsWithSharks
Highly doubtful that she [Palin} would be invited. Of course, that might not stop her from attempting to invite herself.

Well, that's a course and ugly thing to say about Sarah. Did you sign up just a month ago to start slandering Gov Palin on this website?

88 posted on 12/17/2010 9:13:27 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
obama’s persona was just as real as those Styrofoam Roman columns in Denver. He is the Styrofoam president. He looks good from a distance... until you scratch below the surface... he just flakes away into nothing.

LLS

89 posted on 12/17/2010 9:15:29 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: susannah59
Why should they invite yet another assault on the Queen's person?

I believe that should be "assault on the Queen's Majesty", as it is improper to address her personally, one must speak to "the office" as it were.

But I agree completely, I would not be surprised if that man and his "partner" are never allowed back in the presence of the Queen's Majesty again. Ever.

90 posted on 12/17/2010 9:15:33 AM PST by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: 23 Everest
Just as it is none of Britain's business how we conduct our government... except in relations between the two... it is none of OUR business if they keep their royal traditions or not.

LLS

91 posted on 12/17/2010 9:18:19 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

LOL!!!

When did they replace Mr. Drysdale with the Kenyan Kommunist?

He’s more like the banker’s stuffy, elitist, snob wife than the banker.

I’d like to see Granny give him a whoopin’ with her soap-making ladle.

LOLOLOL!!!


92 posted on 12/17/2010 9:19:22 AM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
What size.....lol
93 posted on 12/17/2010 9:26:53 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
I will defer to you on the correct terminology, though I am sure the Queen's person felt the unwelcome sensation quite clearly!

If I am correct in my speculation, the assault was probably more intended as an insult to the office than to the actual person, in fact.

94 posted on 12/17/2010 9:32:42 AM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: henry_reardon
some truth in this, I was asked to provide a traditional British dish for my companies pot luck. I declined and explained that there was a good reason I’d married an Italian lady.


Don't decline next time it's no problem, just make a traditional English Trifle with lots of booze in it. A guaranteed hit, and even I can make one...:^)

You do need the correct dish to show it off nicely...


95 posted on 12/17/2010 9:34:10 AM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

8.


96 posted on 12/17/2010 9:35:31 AM PST by Tax-chick (He will be Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Not having Michelle there will cut down the catering bill considerably, and all they give up is cheap CD for a wedding present.


97 posted on 12/17/2010 9:39:26 AM PST by Spok (Obama: clueless, classless, clown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLD

“Now I hope they invited George and Laura Bush,wouldn’t that just be a slap in the face to the Muslims and Amazon woman..”

Oh pretty please! That would rock!


98 posted on 12/17/2010 9:43:07 AM PST by freebird5850 (When 0bama fails, FREEDOM prevails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

After the disgraceful way Obama has treated one of our best allies, the Brits, this is hardly surprising.


99 posted on 12/17/2010 9:48:37 AM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Is “W” on the list?


100 posted on 12/17/2010 9:52:16 AM PST by mad puppy (Obama Care is a 'Giffen Good'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson