Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snub for Obamas as Royal sources reveal they will not be invited to Prince William's wedding
Mail Online ^ | December 17, 2010 | FAY SCHLESINGER

Posted on 12/17/2010 7:21:12 AM PST by katieanna

President Obama and his wife Michelle will not be invited to Prince William's wedding next year. Because Prince William is not yet heir to the throne, his wedding to Kate Middleton is not classed as a ‘state occasion’ – and the couple feel under no pressure to fill the 2,000-strong guest list with heads of state, the Mail understands. They are more eager to ask ordinary citizens and charity workers than foreign dignitaries and VIPs to what will be the first royal ‘people’s wedding’, courtiers suggested. A handful of heads of state are likely to be invited in line with previous royal weddings, possibly including France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife Carla Bruni.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339315/President-Obama-snubbed-sources-reveal-invited-Prince-Williams-wedding.html#ixzz18Niyt5qd

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: england; hrhwilliam; nobama; obama; qe2; usuk; yobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: altura

You know, it occurs to me that the Pres. would not be invited, it would be the first Lady. Mrs. Reagan attended Charles & Diana’s nuptials and Mrs. Clinton attended Diana’s funeral. You’d think they’d invite Dr. Jill Biden, at least. I am a bit surprised...
Well, cheers to Wills & Kate


41 posted on 12/17/2010 7:43:22 AM PST by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

related http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2643957/posts


42 posted on 12/17/2010 7:43:22 AM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 23 Everest

Britain makes far more from the royals than pays out to them.

‘Naturalman1975’ here is very good at the facts and figures.


43 posted on 12/17/2010 7:44:27 AM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
Their wedding photos will last forever.

Why would they want the one time 4 year occupant of the Presidency, a not very popular or successful one at that, involved in their wedding and in their wedding photos?

44 posted on 12/17/2010 7:44:27 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

That would be funny.


45 posted on 12/17/2010 7:44:54 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains
"colonialist honkeys"

Sometimes on the FR I run across a term that goes beyond my understanding. I would be ever so greatful if you could explain the term "colonialist honkeys."

46 posted on 12/17/2010 7:45:40 AM PST by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Woudln’t it be a kick if they invited Sarah Palin?

That would be lovely. BamBam and the Wookie would flip out.

47 posted on 12/17/2010 7:46:23 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 23 Everest

That the people should not pay the cost of the wedding was widely discussed in England. The palace announced that Charles would pay the costs except for the security. I know that the people pay the salary of the Royals; however, the Windsors are the largest landowners in the country so they have considerable personal wealth.


48 posted on 12/17/2010 7:48:22 AM PST by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Why would they invite that worthless freak show from Chicago?


49 posted on 12/17/2010 7:48:44 AM PST by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 23 Everest

You also miss the point that the Royals have a sense of responsibility towards the nation and do good work on behalf of the nation and many charities.

I can tell you as a Scot/Brit, that many ‘dole’ claimants in Britain are lazy and selfish. Many are drunks or junkies who are still drunk or spaced out when they go to claim their fortnightly ‘giro’ at the benefit office (I know, I have served them as a benefit office worker AND been an umemployed person behind them).They cant spell or give the meaning of the word responsibility, let alone show any.

I am no royalist, but I’d rather my tax and NI goes to pay for Charles and William and Kate than some junkie waste of space who cant be bothered to work.


50 posted on 12/17/2010 7:49:21 AM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Princess Di in her second life as an ambassador of good will, would have liked Sarah Palin. They both would “get” the fishbowl life and its toll.

I suspect anyone from the US govt that William invites will be someone who had ties to his late mother


51 posted on 12/17/2010 7:51:31 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Prole

SMILE MOOSHELL! YOU’RE ON CANDID CAMERA!

(this shot speaks VOLUMES)


52 posted on 12/17/2010 7:52:45 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (Don't let reality ruin your day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 23 Everest
An amazingly ignorant post from you.

The Royal Family is not supported by taxes. They used to receive money known as 'the civil list': but this wasn't public money. It was a replacement for income from the Crown Lands. It was their property. Now as I understand it they don't even receive the civil list money - by their own choice.

I can see why you might be confused. Your Royal Family (and is there another word?) spent 200 million dollars a day during their train-wreck of a visit to India. But that's not the way things happen over here.

53 posted on 12/17/2010 7:53:36 AM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Obama baby mama acted like a hick, getting all up in the Queen’s space when they visited them. As much as Moochelle thinks of herself, she is NOT royalty no matter how many makep artists she has. Hmmm...I wonder if she has wipers.

But let me quote: ‘Royal etiquette dictates that the Queen not be touched unless she reaches out first. Patting the Queen’s back, however, is almost unprecedented behavior in Buckingham Palace.’
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/02/michelle-obama-hugs-queen_n_182237.html

Unless Kate and Wills want to turn their royal occasion into a ghetto shindig, they are spot on in not extending an invite. I imagine they didn’t want to embarrass the US anymore as they pretty much know what wedding gift they would get from the Obamas. Let’s just say I am sure they already have ipods and really don’t want a gift basket filled with pickled okra, cucumbers and carrots from MO.
http://toddstarnes.com/2010/09/mrs-obama-gives-leaders-picked-okra/


54 posted on 12/17/2010 7:56:06 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyIndianNameIsSwimsWithSharks

Even in the Kingdom of Really Small Posts, your #25 would be viewed as really small.


55 posted on 12/17/2010 7:57:47 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Well, would YOU invite a guest to your wedding who’s known globally for giving the weirdest, tackiest gifts?


56 posted on 12/17/2010 7:58:54 AM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

The Brits could really give a backhand to Mr & Mrs Marxist, by inviting Gov Palin. omg...that would be incredibly entertaining. Let’s email Prince William and suggest that!


57 posted on 12/17/2010 8:02:31 AM PST by Outlaw Woman (It's come to the point that we need to start thinking about where to put the bodies...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

some truth in this, I was asked to provide a traditional British dish for my companies pot luck. I declined and explained that there was a good reason I’d married an Italian lady.


58 posted on 12/17/2010 8:03:45 AM PST by henry_reardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Woudln’t it be a kick if they invited Sarah Palin?

Oh, that would be golden! LOL

59 posted on 12/17/2010 8:15:53 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
This is what obama would wear if he went to the wedding,to hnor his father and granpa..
60 posted on 12/17/2010 8:18:40 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson