Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
Thebarton was in Adelaide and was sold to Ashford.
Would that be the same office for births as the one you posted. I don’t know jack about Australia.
remember this, you could have the CIA or some such shadowy group..doing things here..including hacking into others sites and posting stuff ..and waiting for us to find it.
Bomford may be a fake.
Yes. True dat. We’ll see if we can find another 1964 extraction Birth record.
Sorry but post 52 has no image.
Planted in June 05??
So much depends on the actual history of the document that Taitz has.
It’s not. Who gave Attorney Taitz the doc? It’s far from over.
These aren’t similar. They’re identical.
Same form number. Same price. Same last name for the Registrar and District Registrar. Same book. Same page.
Jim Robinson’s copy, from Post #72 on this thread, and Swordmaker’s photo from Post #52 on the huge thread both have “K.F”.
I’ve saved both images to my Desktop and with Mac Preview (Zoomed in) the “K” is plain as day. No doubt whatsoever.
I’m thinking this is the original, real Kenyan BC and the rest phonies.
I think that may by the guy from a 1865 document.
I think I might be able to answer my own question as to motive. Someone out to discredit Taitz creates an elaborate fraud Obama BC with several tell-tale similarities to another totally unrelated document, the Bomford BC, and gets her to take the bait, knowing that the Obama fraud will be exposed by the discovery of Bomford, the ticking time bomb. Diabolically clever.
Same book and page? How likely is that?
The forger's error was being too lazy to make up new numbers, assuming Bomford's cert would not be found.
On the other hand, maybe he just underestimated the half-life of his forgery. He had to know the game would be up when the actual government records turned out not to contain the alleged facts.
No one has forgotten. We still have someone in the People's House that is a smoke and mirrors fraud.
“I’m still thinking Swordmaker’s post from the huge thread got the REAL Kenyan BC”
+++++++++++++
If you haven’t looked at #291 of this thread, you need to:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307402/posts?page=291#291
Ok .. and I don’t have one.
**ALL those with a PACER acct can see what’s
in the court file HERE:
https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/03118509265
AND THAT IS THE SAME ENDING # THAT SCRIBD IS
SHOWING ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THEIR SITE FOR
THE KENYAN COLB .. FAKE OR WHATEVER
YET WHEN THE LINK COMPLETES, A WHOLE DIFFERENT
NUMBER SHOWS FOR THAT DOCUMENT: /18018714
THEY GAVE IT A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT # THAN
WAS FILED
Is it NOT a punishable crime for them to
tamper with a court document?
Tech..you posted that you got this info from somewhere else:
(You said:)
“Someone posted this elsewhere:”
Where did you get this info? ‘Somewhere else’? It’s important to track it back imho.
EG..this could be a set up by this Bomford person for all we know. Glad you tracked down the Whois. Anyone can put up images on the internet, photoshop them etc. This may be part of the hoax or a it could be disinformation.
Same form number. Same price. Same last name for the Registrar and District Registrar. Same book. Same page.
over here, if you will
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307517/posts
I think they’re talking about Post #52 from the other, huge thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2306351/posts?page=52#52
This is the photo of the BC with the “K.F. Lavender” in it.
I wouldn’t say that..but it is probably possible to manipulate that date.
For now, I am going with the Taitz one being fake.
But keeping my mind open since I feel the CIA was involved with this family way back when....
In actuality, they could have faked all kinds of stuff long ago for a “mission” “backstory” etc.
I don’t think we will ever get to the bottom of it.
Too lazy to change a number? I think it was intentional.
This Bomford document appears to be the fake. Notice that the "No." field of the Australian BC is 2.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.