Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Sorry the layout of my last post is all weird...
excellent work
but damn, I feel for that poor guy at State Dept, to knowingly be immersed in such a sewer of an administration and cover up
Some collector needs to come up with original 1961 copies of those Honolulu newspapers- just fantasizing
l953. Not sure why anybody would type an l instead of a 1 there…
Brilliant.....With the other finds by various freepers, this is looking like a total forgery.
really odd? Why and how would that happen?
All of the other 1s on the doc look like lower-case ls. Someone on another thread mentioned that back in the day they would use the letter o for zero and a lower case l for 1.
As soon as I saw the Aussie BC I noticed a difference in the 1s. Again, not sure if it’s relevant. I have used old typewriters in the past but not enough to make an assessment.
Post 6,059
This is becoming a high stakes game and everyone keeps raising. Orly Taitz seems to be very close to the truth, or she is the flake that some people claim. I find it very interesting that Hillary Clinton has been placed in the middle of this, wonder why.
It won’t be long now, If Taitz fails it will be very difficult for her, or anyone else to pick up the pieces..... assume “crash positions”.
“Hm, the letter in 1953 looks like a small L, like l953. Not sure why anybody would type an l instead of a 1 there… “
An earlier post covered this - a member here who worked with typewriters for 30 years said that early typewriters didn’t have an 1 or 0, so they were typed l and O.
Maybe this was one of the newer typewriters and the typist reverted to the older typing system for a moment.
Hi,
I just posted it on the ‘Heads Up’ thread. Is that the one you were talking about.
Sorry, I’m at work and a bit distracted right now!
The Left is always ABOUT TO reveal that the birthers fell for some phony document, and crow about how dumb the birthers are.
Here’s the question:
WHEN has the Left ever put out a document that the birthers fell for hook, line, and sinker, only to made fools of by the Left?
“Some collector needs to come up with original 1961 copies of those Honolulu newspapers- just fantasizing”
Why not just mosey down to the area library and look it up on microfilm, bet you could even print a copy? Verifying how it got in there, if it exists, would be a little more complicated.
I’d like to see a roundtable discussion by the top people on this and make the case step by step. Put it on video and spread it.
bttt
Yeah, dude in a shiny orange wig isn’t evidence of anything, LOL.
I tried to add him as a friend. We’ll see if he replies. Interesting to find out what he thinks after probably 12,000 friend requests, LOL.
Is there an explanation for Mr. Bomford birth in 1959 but on his BC the registration date is 1964? That is 5 years, is that typical?
Someone has already done that, and showed how the announcement did not quite “fit” the column spacing etc
Not to mention the timing of when this newspaper birth announcement was “discovered”, 40 days after the death of the final true resident of that address posted in the birth announcement.
I clipped my own child’s birth announcement the day it was published. I didn’t suddenly remember it 40+ years later
But I’m not going to go back and look up that research
Let’s just say I no longer trust web images of nonpaper, electronically stored documents - or any documents, really. That is up to a court of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.