Skip to comments.
BREAKING: USSC delays Chrysler asset sale!
CNBC Breaking News (live) ^
| 08 JUL 09
| dcbryan1
Posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:48 PM PDT by DCBryan1
Breaking on CNBC:
USSC delays Chyrsler asset sale!
Mourdock: USe of Tarp Funds in automotive industry was illegal
Obama admin had urged USSC NOT to keep chrysler deal on hold
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alito; automakers; bankruptcy; bho44; bhoscotus; bitchslap; breyer; chapter11; chapter7; chrysler; dictatorspeedbump; fiat; ginsberg; gm; irs; italy; judicialactivism; kennedy; obama; roberts; ruleoflaw; ruling; scalia; scalito; scotus; sotomayor; stephens; tarp; thomas; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-294 next last
To: DCBryan1
USSC would not have issued a stay/hold if they didnt intend to sit and rule on the constitutionality of the whole deal. Don't go counting your chickens.
To: Marie2
22
posted on
06/08/2009 1:15:38 PM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: DCBryan1
Take that, and that, and that, and THAT!! (sounds of Zero’s floppy ears getting boxed by Buzzy Ginsburg)
To: jennyjenny
Indiana no likey Obama anymore.And vicey versey, no doubt. Elkhart? What Elkart?
24
posted on
06/08/2009 1:16:18 PM PDT
by
Ahithophel
(Padron@Anniversario)
To: Bender2; txhurl; nuconvert
25
posted on
06/08/2009 1:16:35 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: DCBryan1
USSC would not have issued a stay/hold if they didnt intend to sit and rule on the constitutionality of the whole deal. Solicitor General Kagan argued that the Supreme Court didn't have authority to rule on this case. I wouldn't be surprised that the USSC took the case just to rule that they do have authority over it no matter which way they rule.
26
posted on
06/08/2009 1:16:57 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: DCBryan1
Uh oh - Michelle is gonna be scowling ever more than usual now.
27
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:05 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(When you put Democrats in charge, stupid things happen)
To: DCBryan1
HUSSEIN LOSES TO SCOTUS
for the time being, anyway.
28
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:16 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: DCBryan1
Obummer is not going to like this. Not one bit.
He doesn’t like people who follow a just law and the Constitution.
Thank God the SCOTUS is not lost...yet.
Preserve our Republic!
29
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:22 PM PDT
by
JenB987
To: DCBryan1
30
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:26 PM PDT
by
Revelation 911
(How many 100's of 1000's of our servicemen died so we would never bow to a king?" -freeper pnh102)
To: DCBryan1
The current wall street folks are bunch of socialist limousine liberals. I think they want socialism as much as Obama does.
31
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:31 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(God Bless our brave troops)
To: DCBryan1
Id the Court hears the case, and if they ultimately rule the use of TARP funds for auto makers was not authorized, somebody should actually go to jail for misappropriation of funds.
If the CEO of a corporation had done something similar with borrowed funds, he would do time.
In this case, would it be Turbo Tax Timmy? Or would it be an impeachable offense for The Won?
32
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:31 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
To: DCBryan1
33
posted on
06/08/2009 1:17:41 PM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
To: americanophile
“Could it be that the unconstitutional TARP will have its day of judgment?”
I guess we can still hope!
34
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:16 PM PDT
by
AuntB
(The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
To: DCBryan1
35
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:26 PM PDT
by
LikeLight
(http://www.believersguidetolegalissues.com)
To: Snickering Hound
LMAO! Perfect pic for the occasion. ;-)
36
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:27 PM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
To: DCBryan1
Obama admin had urged USSC NOT to keep chrysler deal on hold Urging thats not above your pay grade, Obomba?
37
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:41 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: technically right
UAW Death Sqaud Teams and Bus Loads of ACORN Teams are heading to Indiana now to help explain things to the populace
38
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:41 PM PDT
by
Scythian
39
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:49 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(I will not be silenced.)
To: DCBryan1
Obviously Obama will say the court is too Conservative. USSC may be the last chance to save America. I nominate everything that Obama does be challenged in the USSC starting with his official record of BIRTH.
40
posted on
06/08/2009 1:18:53 PM PDT
by
Typical_Whitey
(Hey Obama how many Freedoms have you taken away from Americans today?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-294 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson