[Non-Sequitur]

USSC would not have issued a stay/hold if they didnt intend to sit and rule on the constitutionality of the whole deal.

Don't go counting your chickens.

[Unlikely Hero]

Agreed.

And now, let us celebrate “activist” courts because they are saying something we agree with! Maybe.

[DaveTesla]

"Don't go counting your chickens. "

[bustinchops]

I agree. To not have taken the case though would have been the Court’s imprimatur on the deal and the notion of stiffing secured creditors in favor of labor unions. I don’t think even Ginsburg would want their approval to be so blatant and obvious.

Nevertheless, it’s difficult for me to imagine that the Court would support the deal, but then I was wrong when I said the same thing about the Kelo case.

One thing is for sure: ostammer’s efforts to conquer the middle class by dividing it through preferential treatment and a spoils system is working. I just wonder how many of those Indiana cops and teachers and firemen invested in that pension plan holding the bonds are blaming union workers rather than ostammer. And I say that with the disclaimer that I despise labor unions.