Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone (more evidence for young earth creation!)
New Scientist ^ | April 30, 2009 | Jeff Hecht

Posted on 05/01/2009 8:25:18 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

A dinosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells. The finding is important because it should resolve doubts about a previous report that also claimed to have extracted dino tissue from fossils...

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: belongsinreligion; crackpot; creation; dinosaur; dinosaurs; evolution; godgravesglyphs; godsgravesglyphs; goodgodimnutz; hadrosaur; humor; intelligentdesign; maryschweitzer; notanewstopic; notasciencetopic; propellerbeanie; science; tyrannosaurusrex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
For more, see:

Dinosaur Blood Protein, Cells Recovered

http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430b

Dinosaur Soft Tissues and Blood (cool micrograph pictures!)

http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html#Dinosaur%20Soft%20Tissues%20and%20Blood

Are Secular Geologists Ready to Consider a Global Flood?

http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430a

1 posted on 05/01/2009 8:25:18 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Ping!

For more, see:

Dinosaur Blood Protein, Cells Recovered

http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430b

Dinosaur Soft Tissues and Blood (cool micrograph pictures!)

http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html#Dinosaur%20Soft%20Tissues%20and%20Blood

Are Secular Geologists Ready to Consider a Global Flood?

http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430a


2 posted on 05/01/2009 8:26:30 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; All

This article proves you wrong.. You keep saying the Earth is 6000 years old.


3 posted on 05/01/2009 8:26:49 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Now a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: GodGunsGuts

I don’t see any ‘young’ evidence in this article.


5 posted on 05/01/2009 8:31:24 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I’m not talking about their belief in darwood’s materialist creation myth, I’m talking about the data. The DATA is much more supportive of Young Earth Creation.


6 posted on 05/01/2009 8:33:03 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
....more evidence for young earth creation!

OK - it's Friday & I'm ready to be entertained.

How is this evidence?

7 posted on 05/01/2009 8:33:51 AM PDT by gdani (I've got a new road under my wheels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Yes. “More” evidence...........................................lol!


8 posted on 05/01/2009 8:33:56 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

No matter how they try to spin it, finding blood and soft tissue in two dinos (and counting) is far more supportive of YEC than old earth, uniformitarian evolution.


9 posted on 05/01/2009 8:35:04 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; All

I’m saying the article proved you wrong....


10 posted on 05/01/2009 8:35:22 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Now a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

OK, I’m game.. how...


11 posted on 05/01/2009 8:35:47 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
There IS NO EVIDENCE for a young earth!!!
12 posted on 05/01/2009 8:35:52 AM PDT by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
....finding blood and soft tissue in two dinos (and counting) is far more supportive of YEC than old earth, uniformitarian evolution.

How so?

13 posted on 05/01/2009 8:36:19 AM PDT by gdani (I've got a new road under my wheels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Crackpot Alert!


14 posted on 05/01/2009 8:37:34 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani

They have found blood and soft tissue in two dinos now. One supposedly dating back 65 mya, the other dating back 80 mya. This is what one would expect of biblical creation is true, whereas this is the last thing one would expect if deep-time evolution is true.


15 posted on 05/01/2009 8:37:59 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gdani

More interesting would be the explanation of how such proteins and cell structures endured intact over the past 80 million years.


16 posted on 05/01/2009 8:38:32 AM PDT by skeeter (First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you. Then you win - Mahatma Ghandi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gdani

Because finding blood and soft tissue is exactly what you would expect if YEC is true, whereas it is the last thing you would expect if dino went extinct tens of millions of years ago.


17 posted on 05/01/2009 8:39:26 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

See multiple replies above.


18 posted on 05/01/2009 8:40:12 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

19 posted on 05/01/2009 8:42:29 AM PDT by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
More interesting would be the explanation of how such proteins and cell structures endured intact over the past 80 million years.

The article doesn't say those structures where intact, it doesn't give any indication of the level of decomposition of those structures. It is easy to figure out though how they may have survived. What causes decomposition? Exposure to air, microbes, light, etc. Absent those things, decomposition may stop or slow down. It is not an unknown scenario.

20 posted on 05/01/2009 8:42:34 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson