Dinosaur Blood Protein, Cells Recovered
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430b
Dinosaur Soft Tissues and Blood (cool micrograph pictures!)
http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html#Dinosaur%20Soft%20Tissues%20and%20Blood
Are Secular Geologists Ready to Consider a Global Flood?
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430a
Ping!
For more, see:
Dinosaur Blood Protein, Cells Recovered
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430b
Dinosaur Soft Tissues and Blood (cool micrograph pictures!)
http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html#Dinosaur%20Soft%20Tissues%20and%20Blood
Are Secular Geologists Ready to Consider a Global Flood?
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430a
This article proves you wrong.. You keep saying the Earth is 6000 years old.
I don’t see any ‘young’ evidence in this article.
OK - it's Friday & I'm ready to be entertained.
How is this evidence?
Yes. “More” evidence...........................................lol!
Viable DNA? Jurassic Park here we come!
Thought you might be interested. Also see reply #2
Enough is enough. Please stop posting interesting scientific articles with your insane rantings that aren’t even supported by the text.
Fools.
The age of the earth doesn’t necessarily prove or disprove Darwin, just as Darwin’s theory of evolution doesn’t necessarily prove or disprove the existence of God.
home
As others have already pointed out, this is based upon the work of Mary Schweitzer, which is detailed in Discovery Magazine. Here are some quotes from the article. She says some things that echo my own experiences, both good and bad.
Schweitzer's first forays into paleontology were "a total hook," she says. Not only was she fascinated by the science, but to her, digging into ancient strata seemed like reading the history of God's handiwork. Schweitzer worships at two churches—an evangelical church in Montana and a nondenominational one when she is back home in North Carolina—and when she talks about her faith, her bristly demeanor falls away. "God is so multidimensional," she says. "I see a sense of humor. I see His compassion in the world around me. It makes me curious, because the creator is revealed in the creation." Unlike many creationists, she finds the notion of a world evolving over billions of years theologically exhilarating: "That makes God a lot bigger than thinking of Him as a magician that pulled everything out in one fell swoop."
...
While scientists struggled to make sense of the bones, another community had no doubt about how to interpret the results. The reports were quickly embraced by biblical literalists who believe God created life on Earth less than 10,000 years ago. For decades they have been working to place a scientific patina on their ideas. The Institute for Creation Research runs a graduate school near San Diego with 11 instructors who hold doctorates in biochemistry, geology, and other sciences. Conferences offer papers on topics like the physics of the Genesis flood. "Any time there's empirical evidence, that's gold for them," says Ronald Numbers, a professor of the history of science and medicine at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.
To Schweitzer, trying to prove your religious beliefs through empirical evidence is absurd, if not sacrilegious. "If God is who He says He is, He doesn't need us to twist and contort scientific data," she says. "The thing that's most important to God is our faith. Therefore, He's not going to allow Himself to be proven by scientific methodologies."
Some creationists, noting Schweitzer's evangelical faith, have tried to pressure her into siding with them. "It is high time that the 'Scientific' community comes clean: meaning that the public is going to hold them ACCOUNTABLE when they find out that they have been misled," reads a recent e-mail message Schweitzer received. She has received dozens of similar notes, a few of them outright menacing.
These religious attacks wound her far more than the scientific ones. "It rips my guts out," she says. "These people are claiming to represent the Christ that I love. They're not doing a very good job. It's no wonder that a lot of my colleagues are atheists." She told one zealot, "You know, if the only picture of Christ I had was your attitude towards me, I'd run."
Ironically, the insides of Cretaceous-era dinosaur bones have only deepened Schweitzer's faith. "My God has gotten so much bigger since I've been a scientist," she says. "He doesn't stay in my boxes."
God bless you, my brother.
I know you have thick skin, you have to with some folks aruond here. It is fascinating to watch the reaction of some around here, who are so willing to believe that soft tissue can be found in supposed 80 million year old fossils, and profoundly refuse and mock those of us with the truth on our side. They certainly have scales over their eyes.
Only a creationist would conclude that an 80 million-year-old find proves the earth is 6000 years old.
I just read this in the paper this morning, what a wonderful day for science. The old earth EVO’s have to be crapping themselves. The funny part of the article I read said that blood was found in an 80 million year old fossil stating as if it was a fact the fossil was 80 million years old. That is the power these religious nuts hold over the media and higher education. Simply amazing that educated people would be so blind that they cannot see the young earth evidence right in front of their eyes. Or even question their own (now seemingly false) belief that maybe the earth isn’t so old after all. I won’t hold my breath on those zealot nut cases to ever relent on their false religion lies and phony dating techniques. 80 million years, keep dreaming Evolutionist, the facts and evidence are starting to mount against you.
Ping