Shedding Light on the Protein Big Bang Theory

CEH ^ | March 13, 2009

[GodGunsGuts]

Shedding Light on the Protein Big Bang Theory

March 13, 2009 — The precise three-dimensional structure of a typical protein molecule is so complex, its origin would seem hopeless by chance. What if evolutionary biologists were to discover a whole host of proteins literally exploded into existence at the beginning of complex life? We can find out what they would think by looking at an article on the “protein big bang” found on Astrobiology Magazine...

[Wacka]

Sorry, post 20 should be directed to GGG instead of Electric Strawberry

[ElectricStrawberry]

I’m obviously not a creationist and you’ve not asked me anything 100 times.

BS Biology with Immunology focus. UMASS
PhD Immunology of Infectious Diseases. HSPH

[ElectricStrawberry]

Your understanding of Darwins complete works is severely lacking.

[ElectricStrawberry]

GGG doesn’t have any scientific background or he wouldn’t link to so many articles that say nothing...thinking they say something.

[CottShop]

Yes GGG- Donthcaknow that it takes a phd in order to invent fantastic just so stories about evulotion out of htin air? And dodntchaknow that it apparently takes a phd to spot such nonsense about Macroevolution when evos post them? And dontchaknow that it takes a phd to ignore the silly fantastic just so stories and to call it science and to call everyone who quesitons these just so stories about macroevolution uneducated fools? Get with the program GGG- Exposing the nonsense in macroevolutionary sceanrios abotu the past is a no no dontchaknow- If you do so, you’ll be attacked left and right, up and down, and every which way but loose. Exposing Darwin and those who followed him with even greater fantastical made up just so stories about past events is a cardinal sin

[Troy McGreggor]

Is there a large movement of Christians who are trying to force you believe in the Christian God? Are they trying to prevent you from discovering your own truth somehow?

Or do you just resent them and their good works, so you lash out at them at any opportunity?

You seem as much of a science ideologue as the most fevered Christian in the middle of speaking in tongues.

I’m not Christian/religious, so don’t bother calling me a religious nut.

[Troy McGreggor]

How did DNA fit into ‘Darwin’s complete works?’

Oops, he was right about everything except our most basic components. I’m sure the rest is equally valid.

[allmendream]

Darwin hardly had to identify the molecule of inheritance to know that traits were inherited, and that those traits that conferred an advantage would be inherited by a larger subset of the population than traits that conferred a disadvantage.

Darwin was not a prophet who had to be in touch with some absolute source of information, was infallible, and lived a life above reproach.

Darwin was a scientist. All he had to do was construct a theoretical framework that helped to explain and predict observances. He did. His theory was of so much use that it is still being used, mostly as he formulated it, some hundred and fifty years later.

[ElectricStrawberry]

Such a scientist you must be to mandate that someone know everything that will be discovered in the FUTURE....when offering up theories in the 1859 present. Must've missed that part of the Method.

Anyone that limits Darwin's actual works to "a few finches and their beak differences" doesn't know what they're talking about.

[CottShop]

[[Or do you just resent them and their good works, so you lash out at them at any opportunity?]]

That’s abotu hte whole crux of hte issue- These folks NEVER EVER discuss the issues in the articles, but rather imediately engage in name calling, charachter assassination, and hand waving dismissals- They follow GGG around and pop into every thread he posts with nothign more substantial than name calling, and hten have the nerve to suggest that because we’re not ‘scientists’, then we shouldn’t be looking into the outrageous claims of Macroeovlution and ocmmenting on the obvious blatant lies and misdirections and half-truths that we discover-

Apparently Macroevolution hypothesis is in such sad shape than name calling and character assassination is the last defense efforts of the die hards.

[itsahoot]

If science offends God I’m certain he’d let us know.

It is not Science that offends God, it is denial. His reaction to that is well known, to even casual readers of the Bible, Both Old and New Testament. For the really fun parts read Revelation starting at chapter four, to the end should find some really fun stuff there. I am assuming the first three chapters would not really apply to you, they may however, if you understand the other reading assignment.