Posted on 12/07/2008 11:14:58 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
As of this writing, December 6th, the Supreme Court has not yet announced whether or not it will take up the Donofrio case, or any other case concerning Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office of President.
Yet there is no more important issue before the court today and the clock is ticking.
(snip)
The Supreme Court of the United States of America has but one primary obligation to the American people, and that obligation is to use the power afforded it under Article III—Section I of the Constitution, to uphold, protect and preserve the U.S. Constitution, the Charters of Freedom, and provide equal justice for all, without regard to personal political leanings or ambitions…
(Excerpt) Read more at capitolhillcoffeehouse.com ...
A fraudulent candidate whose birth place and entire past is under lock and key can be sworn into office by a Supreme Court that refuses to view his constitutional requirements and you think this is “upholding the constitution?”
I'm dying to hear this fairy tale... lets hear your logic?
WHAT????
Here’s a 9 part radio interview on Saturday with Leo Donfrio about his case. Worth listening to.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8L-rUwNj38&feature=related
(Ignore the backwaters-sounding radio commentator - it’s truly unfortunate that guys that sound like they just stepped out of a bayou are mouthpieces for conservatives).
Amen!
“It is a travesty that the Berg case was disregarded for lack of merit. We are a government of the people. A citizen should have the standing to make sure a person seeking the Presidency is eligible.”
I agree a citizen should have standing, but have learned a lot about how these cases vary and noticed the ones with standing are claims against Secs.of State, not Obama himself like Berg did in his case. Also going on the citizen status at birth as Leo has done might have more merit in the Justices’ opinions. Leo does not ask for the birth certificate to be released. He is basing his case on Obama’s statements as to where he was born.
You really didn't have to do that. You are becoming part of the problem rather than being part of the solution.
Why is it that, whenever someone disagrees with a select few, they are immediately branded a troll? Do you not welcome open discussion here? I am new here, and at first I felt like I had found a group of long lost friends. But I have been afraid to post unless I completely agree with the vast majority, because I don’t want to be called names.
It's not the actual, original, long-form, PAPER birth certificate issued at the date and time of birth, in the hospital and geographical location where that birth occurred, witnessed and signed by the doctor, and the hospital, and fully certified by the ruling government authority, that is a "fraud."
Not even close.
HOWEVER, what IS a fraud, is the President-"Not Elect" who has refused to show, for nearly two years, HIS actual, genuine, original, long-form, PAPER birth certificate that legally attests to the time and location of birth. It is this same person, who has already spent $1,000,000 of campaign contributions on lawyers and legal fees to BLOCK the courts from ever seeing it, and who has already acted above the law by failing to comply with it, that posts ON THE INTERNET, not only a totally useless image that cannot be used as proof of being a natural-born US citizen, in any court in America, EVEN if that image, put on the Internet only, had been made from his real original birth certificate by a $65,000 drum scanner -- the best in the world -- but is also an image that was allegedly copied from only a short-form, Certification of Live Birth, a document that anyone living in Hawaii can get, at any time, and at any age, without providing any proof whatsoever as to where and when they were born . So, as hard as it is to believe, instead of showing even a real copy of this ridiculously easy to get, "Certification of Live Birth," the Man who fancies himself an "Agent of Change," OLNY POSTS a crappy-looking, irrefutably "Photoshopped" IMAGE that was msde to look like, what is, in effect, a NONEXISTENT document. This BOGUS DOCUMENT IMAGE was created SOLELY to fool people, like yourself, into believing that he really was born in Hawaii, and for him to AVOID having to ever show his real, original, paper birth certificate as proof of his claim, which, in spite of its visual variations,is both structurally and functionally equivalent to ANY and ALL, actual, original, long-form, paper birth certificates, issued by any State or US territory, ever this they began printing them as evidence of origin, ta paper document that hundreds of millions of Americans have already shown on more than one occassion, without a single one of them, so much as batting an eye in protest.
What is also a fraud, is this, same President-"Not Elect", who, with the help of his many accomplices, such as his Campaign and Factcheck/Annenberg, and under a total media blackout by the MSM, and with the help of a total whitewash and cover-up by every Leftist writer and publisher, did conspire to create and distribute, a false identification document, regardless of its actual form, SPECIFICALLY, AND WITH MALICE AFORETHOUGHT, to deceive the American public into believing that he is a natural-born American, Constitutionally qualified to be President, and to blindly cast their votes for that same person.
IF THAT WAS NOT ENOUGH, that same, bogus, forged image has been used as a political and social sledgehammer to bludgeon any true American and US citizen, who has the nerve to speak out in defense of the Constitution, which is the Law of the Land, and to voice their opposition to allowing a TOTAL FRAUD to waltz his way into the White House, using whatever means that money and power can buy, regardless of whether these means and actions are technically illegal as much as they are morally reprehensible.
Or, something to that effect.
In theory at least the Justices could be impeached could they not? should have happened back in 1960s
SNL thinks it was George Soros.
How to tell a fake from a real one. This is a good start.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SQLJZbuSVXI/AAAAAAAABKM/9B2p—yZzDw/s1600-h/Obama+COLB.jpg
First of all, I believe Obama was born in Hawaii and is thus a natural born citizen.
Second, I know that Chief Justice Roberts and Scaila, Thomas and Alito are Strict Constructionists and will uphold the Constitution.
Now, if you have reason to believe that Roberts and Scaila, Thomas and Alito are not Strict Constructionists, I would like to know your reason why you believe that.
If you believe that Obama was born in Kenya, then you need to find his DS-1350 that recorded that birth. If there were an Obama DS-1350 it would be at the State Department along with my DS-1350.
Of course, you could also get a job with a State Department contractor and like other people take a peek into Obama’s Passport file. That Passport file will show the place where he was born.
And no one that looked at Obama’s Passport or Passport File has said that the document lists his place of birth as Kenya.
Well I must admit that that very thought crossed my mind more than once.
But I have had a difficult time listening to them talk about meaningless (to me) topics with this story boiling over.
I and others have been fighting the spin doctors that show up here and tell us to be good republicans and stop whining about our loss.
Let’s hope you are correct.
Could men in black suits with badges have visited the talk host....Let them know there was an investigation going on and ask them to step back.....
IIRC something similar to that happened during WWII....Even NYT cooperated.....This could be that level of national security.....
Alright, I'll wrap the rest around the roast.
You really are stuck on stupid fella. Now you just used a Canadian Parlimentary descriptive word. You don’t have a “Loyal Opposition”!! Sheesh. You are clearly an Obama supporter and you just keep hitting “repeat” of all your pet excuses whether they make sense or not and they don’t. !! CO
Yes, but were you looking through the eyes of a professional digital media examiner, or through the eyes of a consumer?
You need to catch up. The docs you saw online have been professionally debunked and are proven forgeries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
