I wonder if they'll march on Norfolk, next.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Rhinoceros
Gee, I wonder if racist, Sharpton or Jackson will show up to condemn this or were they the ones LAUGHING in the background?
2 posted on
09/24/2007 10:45:33 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Rhinoceros
"wonder if they'll march on Norfolk, next." Some of the people on this thread seem to believe that that is in order.
Repaying pettiness for pettiness, guess.
3 posted on
09/24/2007 10:45:43 AM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: Rhinoceros
...are investigating whether an alleged attack against a 13-year-old boy... The tape shows the victim, Damien O'Rourke, who is white, being violently beaten
That doesn't sound like an alleged attack to me, sounds like the kid got 'jumped'.
4 posted on
09/24/2007 10:46:30 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Rhinoceros
Damien O'Rourke, who is white, being violently beaten by a group of African American teenagers. Hmmm. Why is it that the victim is "white" but the perps are "African-Americans"?
Why isn't the victim a "Caucasian-American"?
Or why aren't the perps "blacks"?
5 posted on
09/24/2007 10:46:37 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Rhinoceros
We must make sure that the perpetrator of this horrible crime is prosecuted and imprisoned!
JAIL THE WHITE KID! </sarcasm>
7 posted on
09/24/2007 10:48:24 AM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Hillary for President? In the words of Bell Biv DeVoe: "Never trust a big butt and a smile!")
To: Rhinoceros
The most important question on my mind is “who shot the video?”
9 posted on
09/24/2007 10:49:13 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
To: Rhinoceros
Definition of allege: To assert without or before proof.
Definition of attack: To set upon with violent force.
The tape shows an attack, about 5 boys beating and kicking one boy. To say “alleged attack” gives the impression that a) The boy who was attacked has no proof or b) it hasn’t been proven to be an attack. Even if the boy in some way provoked it (not saying that he did, just speaking hypothetically), he was still attacked. Five boys beating one boy, no matter what the reason, is an attack.
To: Rhinoceros
They need a Rev. somthing for this march.
Try this guy.
He's just a windy as Rev. Al and Jessah.
To: Ping
Ka-ching!
13 posted on
09/24/2007 10:52:08 AM PDT by
evets
(beer)
To: Rhinoceros
I saw this on fox this morning. Didn’t look too “alleged” to me, looked pretty much like a real attack
15 posted on
09/24/2007 10:54:43 AM PDT by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://realitycheck.blogsome.com - and yes, yes, I'm a "FredHead". Fred Thompson for Prez.)
To: Rhinoceros
I can’t wait to hear what Soledad or Sam Donaldson will have to say about THIS. I’m sure they’ll demand justice for the kid who was beaten. /sarcasm
(Their coverage on Jena has been absolutely SICKENING.)
16 posted on
09/24/2007 10:55:58 AM PDT by
Tired of Taxes
(Dad, I will always think of you.)
To: Rhinoceros
What “alleged??” If it is caught on tape, there is no “alleged” about it. PC “news” dumbs down yet another perfectly useful word.
18 posted on
09/24/2007 10:56:31 AM PDT by
redhead
(Victory first; then peace)
To: Rhinoceros
Paging the “Justice Brothers”.
22 posted on
09/24/2007 11:03:20 AM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Rhinoceros
To: Rhinoceros
29 posted on
09/24/2007 11:16:02 AM PDT by
pipecorp
( Al Lahsucks (boat steersman ) hell)
To: Rhinoceros
Using the word “alleged” to describe something that is a proven fact is ludicrous beyond belief. We have gone over the edge of political correctness into some alternative reality of Newspeak.
37 posted on
09/24/2007 11:46:05 AM PDT by
generally
(Ask me about FReepers Folding@Home)
To: Rhinoceros
Well, why wouldn’t this gang of nappy-heads beat the snot out of a white boy. They saw the Jena charges melting into obblivion and figure the law won’t touch them either—being members of a victimized class and all— sharpton and jackson will rush to their sides to defend them.
38 posted on
09/24/2007 12:03:42 PM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Rhinoceros
To: Rhinoceros
being violently beaten Yes, but the important thing is, did anyone display a noose? Then we'd be talking serious crimes.
44 posted on
09/24/2007 12:28:31 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
(Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
To: Rhinoceros
What was it, 7 or 8 blacks against 1 white kid?
Then they video tape it?
The news is asking is this was racial?
What would give them their first clue?
51 posted on
09/24/2007 12:37:30 PM PDT by
dragnet2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson