Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions
americablog.blogspot.com ^ | September 07, 2006 | John in DC

Posted on 09/07/2006 4:12:34 PM PDT by Mo1


Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions

by John in DC - 9/07/2006 06:02:00 PM

This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not even funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, against Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious trouble.

Read it, then read my analysis of it below:
September 7, 2006

Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521

Dear Mr. Iger,

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.”

Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.

Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.

Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of the program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, “It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]

Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.

These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.

Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.

As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, “It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer.”

Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.

Sincerely,

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan
The Senate Democratic leadership just threatened Disney's broadcast license. Not the use of the word "trustee" at the beginning of the letter and "trust" at the end. This is nothing less than an implicit threat that if Disney tries to meddle in the US elections on behalf of the Republicans, they will pay a very serious price when the Democrats get back in power, or even before.

This raises the stakes incredibly for Disney.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 109th; 1stamendment; 2ndamendment; 911; abc; abcbestrong; abledanger; abuseofpower; americanhaters; antiamericanhaters; arkancide; assclowns; balsawoodliberals; benedictarnolds; bergertheftofdocs; binclintonalot; bjclinton; bluedress; boohoo; bookburners; brownshirts; callfbi; cantstandthetruth; castrolovers; censorship; cheaters; chinesecampaignmoney; clinton; clintonhitlist; clintonistas; clintonlegacy; clintonoids; communists; crimedimwitparty; crybabies; democratcensors; democratgestapo; democrats; demofascists; demosocialists; demseattheirown; dimwitscry; dimwitthreats; dirtyrats; disbarred; disney; enemywithin; fascists; fraud; freespeech; gaydaysatdisney; gestapo; gflowers; gorelickmemo; gorelickwall; gramsci; hatefuldimwits; heilhitler; hitler; impeached; intimidation; islamofascism; jfkjrkilledbyhill; jimguytucker; lawsuit; letbinladengo; liars; mao; monica; monicasdress; monicastain; mussolini; nationalsocialists; nazis; notruth; ovalofficestain; pathto911; paulajones; perjury; pinkocommies; popcorn; putsomeiceonit; rapedjuanita; repealmccainfeingold; roselawfirmrecords; sandyburglar; scumbags; sept11; september10thrats; sinkmeister; slickwillie; ss; stabenow; stalin; stalinists; thefinalsolution; thosecrazyrats; thosedirtyrats; toodangfunny; truthhurts; truthiskryptonite; unamerican; waronterror; whileclintonslept; whitewater; whokilledfoster; whokilledjfkjr; whoshotjr; wordsfailme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,341-1,345 next last
To: Dead Dog

"OK, this is now a violation of the 1st Amendment."

I agree, but where do we go to prosecute the violation?


101 posted on 09/07/2006 4:53:51 PM PDT by kilowhskey (Land of the free, because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the ping, I hadn't seen this. I'd really like to see this publicized everywhere. Are copies being sent to Brit Hume, Hannity, Rush and everyone?


102 posted on 09/07/2006 4:54:16 PM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mware

He read it earlier on the air.


103 posted on 09/07/2006 4:54:26 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Simply amazing. I have never seen the rats' howl so much. ABC should announce a "balanced" forum to debate the bias to follow the show. The one on the right can tell the audience about what was left out of the film. Hehehe...

That said, ABC has got to be loving the publicity. More popcorn please...

104 posted on 09/07/2006 4:54:40 PM PDT by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

What was his opinion. Is it a breach of power????


105 posted on 09/07/2006 4:55:19 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin, I'm having alot of difficulty believing all of this...
like white noise...
106 posted on 09/07/2006 4:55:20 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bray
The leftist mafia has managed to keep the lid on their nefarious exploits for the last 6 years, mostly by bashing Bush. Now here comes a simple, straightforward presentation of the truth they have been covering up. They absolutely must stop this program from being seen by the American public. The wrath of a public finally informed about the deceit, the lies and the espionage of these snakes will be terrible.
The letter appeals for credibility to the opinions of people who are known conspirators and liars. Gorelick, Ben Veneste, and Clark are each dangerous and disreputable charlatans. The represent the degradation into which the American left has descended.
ABC has no choice but to show this program. The doom of the Democrat party will shortly follow.
107 posted on 09/07/2006 4:55:33 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; Mo1; Howlin; All

Great blog with links

The Cover Up Continues
September 7th, 2006 2:01 pm

http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/09/07/the-cover-up-continues/


108 posted on 09/07/2006 4:55:55 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]

Everyone who believes that, raise your hands.

Which 9/11 Commission is it that agrees with the report?

How come it's okay when television networks make movies that are blatantly biased and untrue about conservatives?

This is absolutely shocking to me and I've started a Path to 9/11 file so I can write letters to the editor and make sure people know just which party it is that believes in censureship.

Also, this letter from the Senate Democrats is going to EVERYONE on my e-mail list.

109 posted on 09/07/2006 4:55:59 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1


Arggggghhhhhhhhhhh... it would be all fine and dandy for the Rats if it was damaging to the President or like that steaming pile of excrement, Fahrenheit 9/11, which really was fictitious.

The dems are going to get us killed.. it's critical that they be kept from power.


110 posted on 09/07/2006 4:56:16 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

good idea


111 posted on 09/07/2006 4:56:22 PM PDT by Mo1 (Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...

112 posted on 09/07/2006 4:56:37 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Debbie Stabenow just lost the election in Michigan.

Here is the email I sent to her:

Ms. Stabenow,

I can not believe you signed your name to a letter urging ABC and Disney to edit established fact from their 'The Path to 9-11'. By signing your name to that letter, you have participated in the most blatant case of censorship and a clear violation of the First Amendment. How dare you, as a representative of Michigan and the government of the United States of America coerce change in political speech. Where were you when Michael Moore lies profited off Iraqi soldiers and slandered our President? Shame on you, Ms. Stabenow.

I will be sure to tell everyone I know that before they vote in November, to be sure they understand that one of the candidates in the Michigan Senate race is anti-first amendment. And that person is not Michael Bouchard.

With no respect whatsoever,
rintense

--------------------------------------

And here's the email I sent her challenger, Republican Michael Bouchard:

Dear Mr. Bouchard,

I'm sure your media team is already aware, but I wanted to contact you regarding Debbie Stabenow signing her name to a letter urging ABC and Disney to, in essence, censor their movie on 9-11 simply because it exposes the truth regarding failures in the Clinton Administration. I urge you to read this letter and let the constituents of the great state of Michigan know that Ms. Stabenow is in clear violation of the First Amendment by using her political office to censor political speech. I am positive the voters will be as disgusted as I am.

Sincerely,
rintense


113 posted on 09/07/2006 4:56:38 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"...Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people the Democrat Party and the United States Congress in The War on Terorism will be deeply recalled (inconveniently before the 2006 election). We're writing this to you because we're sh1tting in our pants. Seriously, don't do this or we'll sick the SEC or the IRS on you like white on rice, and that's just the beginning...."
114 posted on 09/07/2006 4:57:07 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Mr. Peach just came in and said if this is what they're doing while they're not in power, what will they do while they're IN power?

If people don't rise up and make a HUMUNGOUS stink about this, we're in big trouble and just as culpable as the Silent Majority who just let the leftists run willy nilly over everything this country stands for.


115 posted on 09/07/2006 4:57:21 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

ABC is being Swiftboated. Remember the Swiftboat movie that was taken off the air or forced to change.


116 posted on 09/07/2006 4:57:28 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
They all need to be tarred and feathered, pronto.
117 posted on 09/07/2006 4:57:52 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

"My gosh, this is unbelievable - even for Democrats. They ripped their masks right off!

This is no longer the Party of FDR. It is the Party of Stalin!"

That nails it!


118 posted on 09/07/2006 4:58:04 PM PDT by kilowhskey (Land of the free, because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: mware

Not yet since it's just a threat with no action.


119 posted on 09/07/2006 4:58:35 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Vote for your life. Every vote for a Democrat is a vote against victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Mr. Peach just came in and said if this is what they're doing while they're not in power, what will they do while they're IN power?

Mr. Peach is right!

120 posted on 09/07/2006 4:58:48 PM PDT by Mo1 (Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,341-1,345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson