Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Pentagon spying on Americans?
NBC News ^ | Dec. 13, 2005 | Lisa Myers, Douglas Pasternak, Rich Gardella and the NBC Investigative Unit

Posted on 12/13/2005 5:16:49 PM PST by ADemocratNoMore

Is the Pentagon spying on Americans? Secret database obtained by NBC News tracks ‘suspicious’ domestic groups.

WASHINGTON - A year ago, at a Quaker Meeting House in Lake Worth, Fla., a small group of activists met to plan a protest of military recruiting at local high schools. What they didn't know was that their meeting had come to the attention of the U.S. military.

A secret 400-page Defense Department document obtained by NBC News lists the Lake Worth meeting as a “threat” and one of more than 1,500 “suspicious incidents” across the country over a recent 10-month period.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dod; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; homelandsecurity; leaks; lisamyers; msm; nbcnews; oops; spying; treason; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last
To: Doctor Raoul
Listen carefully or take notes sweetie cups. I am not taking exception to protests, I am taking exception to people involved in subversion.

What's subversion? Protesting a government's policy? Were we supposed to shut up and salute instead of impeach Clinton just because he was "fighting terrorism" and "at war in the Balkans"???? Say, that's a good reason for any leader to start a war..

You sound as lame as the liberals who claimed Abu-Ghrab was directed by Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld. That Lindy England was only following orders.

Now that you brought that up, how in the world was a borderline-retarded, illiterate little desk clerk ever in a position to BE in charge of high-value, dangerous terror suspects? The PR was disasterous, and that sure as hell undermined our mission in Iraq - but we're not supposed to demand any accountability from our leaders?

President Hitlery would love to have those arguments all lined up to defend HER absolute power...

81 posted on 12/13/2005 6:43:53 PM PST by razorgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
Now that you brought that up, how in the world was a borderline-retarded, illiterate little desk clerk ever in a position to BE in charge of high-value, dangerous terror suspects? The PR was disasterous, and that sure as hell undermined our mission in Iraq - but we're not supposed to demand any accountability from our leaders?

Your troll-like tendencies are beginning to show. Go back to DU and chat with your fellow travelers.

82 posted on 12/13/2005 6:46:44 PM PST by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore
Lessee... there are "peacenik" nutcakes protesting at military bases. There are peacenik nutcakes banning recruiters and getting into military faces.

At a sports event, some "peacenik" physically harmed an Iraqi vet -- just because he was associated with things "military".

And NBC is having a cow that groups known to be aligned and allied with "criminal activities" are being looked into?

NBC deserves a newer definition upon its acronym...

83 posted on 12/13/2005 6:47:17 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

Thank you for the support.


84 posted on 12/13/2005 6:47:21 PM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghanistan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
like that gang of faux Quakers in Wisconsin

Amazing. A group based on peaceful resolution is fake and a gang at that. We have Quakers here in central NC. And some of them are just as concerned. Why don't you tell us which citizens of the respective states the federal government deserves to start a list on and we'll get that right over to the 'conservative' administration. I remember a time when conservatives were against any and all government intrusion. Ahhh, but 'we' are in control now (or at war, or post 9/11, feel free to fill in whatever the latest Republican excuse is) so that's all that matters right?

85 posted on 12/13/2005 6:48:18 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
What's subversion?

Sweetie cups, get a friend to look at my previous explainations and explain it to you. It's clearly defined by the excerpt I posted from the reg.

BTW, did you hear Hillary '08 slogan? "Mao Is The Time For Another Clinton". Guess they had a lot of Chinese money left.

86 posted on 12/13/2005 6:50:49 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
According to him.... and look at what Clinton and Reno tried to do using these same arguments,. but different subjects, like the militias and the NRA. You thought the "war on drugs" was fun? Wait 'til you see the "war on guns"... and that's what we're going to have if a Dem gets back into the WH - and I don't care if they supported the war or not, they are ALL on board with the domestic agenda. You want to give them a bigger power arsenal?

You start giving government powers, and trying to justify them, because you think you like what the government is doing NOW, you have to pause and think of when the government will ever give up those powers... and the answer is... NEVER... not willingly anyway, and the fight will be hard.

87 posted on 12/13/2005 6:51:11 PM PST by razorgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
The military's job is to protect US, not themselves - we are the ones paying for them

You were being serious when you wrote that one?

YES it is the military's job to protect THE MILITARY. Who do you think "owns" the assets of the US Military (soldiers, marines, tanks, warehouses, cars, offices, etc.)? Guess what? The United States "owns" those things. The military, They, have a duty to protect these things, and the military.

88 posted on 12/13/2005 6:52:22 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam
Go back to DU and chat with your fellow travelers.

She needs the "Big O" and there's no men at DU who can do the deed.

PS: I think she likes you...

89 posted on 12/13/2005 6:52:32 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
That's called spying.

Spying is the effort of one group or person to find the secrets of another.In over 200 years, the Quakers have yet to perform a terrorist act on this country

Research the group meeting in the Quaker facility - they are buried deep - and tell me they don't deserve a little spying.

90 posted on 12/13/2005 6:52:41 PM PST by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: billbears

There is legitimate protest against this war without a doubt. There are those who are against war no matter what. Those that say unless we are directly attacked then we shouldn't go to war. And those that think only war is justified if a liberal starts it. I have no problems with any of those from a legal/constitutional stand point. I do have a problem with those undermine our troops and aid the enemy. There is no reason for that and those that do so should be investigated.


91 posted on 12/13/2005 6:53:04 PM PST by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
I think you are being hysterical.

At many of these socialists/liberal meetings -- it's an open door invite to any and all to attend. And so if military go and attend this makes them.. what ? No different than anyone else attending those "open" meetings.

Did they bug the meetings? No. They probably took notes, maybe even brought a tape recorder.

So what.

92 posted on 12/13/2005 6:54:45 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
That is completely different from our own military spying and collecting data on US citizens, which I believe is illegal.

Once upon a time, the Attorney General didn't have sufficient assets to keep track of the burgeoning left-wing anti-war element in the country. POTUS was PO'd; ordered SecDef to loan AG counterintelligence and CID personnel to work alongside FBI and other Fed LEO in surveilance and occasionally infiltration of quasi-criminal "Peace" movement. This went on big-time until POTUS changed at next election.

The year was 1968. The POTUS was LBJ. SecDef was Clark Clifford. AG was RAMSEY CLARK.

Am I the only guy to remember this sh!t?

93 posted on 12/13/2005 6:56:20 PM PST by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

My point exactly, the reds have been using the Quakers ever since I can remember.


94 posted on 12/13/2005 6:56:33 PM PST by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
According to him....

You are going to have to do better than that.

95 posted on 12/13/2005 6:57:00 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Carling; ADemocratNoMore; tet68
Hmmmm, NBC, isn't that the same news network that "enhanced" the truth about GM trucks? What makes you think they are not "enhancing" the truth now?
96 posted on 12/13/2005 6:58:13 PM PST by Chgogal (Democrats cut and run, Marines don't. OR Democrats are silent when millions die. Which to use?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Snickersnee

You and Limbaugh. I think I heard it on his show too.


97 posted on 12/13/2005 6:58:42 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ark_girl
Your post is all fine and well to bandy about during NON WAR times.

We are in a WAR. Ergo, your thoughts are useful for peacetime; but not in a time of War.

98 posted on 12/13/2005 6:58:53 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl

> You start giving government powers, and trying to justify them, because you think you like what the government is doing NOW, you have to pause and think of when the government will ever give up those powers... and the answer is... NEVER... not willingly anyway, and the fight will be hard.


I don't disagree with you, but... what's the solution NOW, when we have enemys, both foreign and domestic opperating on U.S. soil. Whatever it is, I have to trust in the professionalism of those people in our military and security services to do the right thing.


99 posted on 12/13/2005 7:03:00 PM PST by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Alia

I'm just saying that we as a country are going to have to decide if we want privacy or absolute safety.

We can't tell the government they're not allowed to monitor anything and then scream bloody murder every time something bad happens because the government wasn't able to stop it.

That goes for war or peace time.


100 posted on 12/13/2005 7:04:09 PM PST by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson