Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anita Hill takes president to task on court picks
Orange County Register ^ | November 3, 2005 | Laurie Kawakami

Posted on 11/03/2005 11:18:56 AM PST by EveningStar

Anita Hill criticized President George W. Bush's standards for selecting U.S. Supreme Court justices, arguing Wednesday night that nominees are selected based on their ability to further his political agenda.


(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: anitahill; aperjurerspeaks; cokecan; fantasylife; flake; harrietmiers; haveabigcupofstfu; johnroberts; liar; liarliarliar; perjurer; samuelalito; scotus; stalker; tool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
This article requires registration and BugMeNot is currently down, pending renewal or deletion. Registration is free but I hope there is an alternative to BugMeNot.
1 posted on 11/03/2005 11:18:57 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Just put some ice on that...


2 posted on 11/03/2005 11:19:50 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

So Ms. Hill, should he choose people to works to hurt his agenda as a more favorable alternative?


3 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:03 AM PST by mnehring (Rove/Libby 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Try GitOutOfMyFace.com


4 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:19 AM PST by calrighty ( Koranimals & Islamopigs....religions of peace! C'mon troops, finish em off!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Damn -- I was wondering what had become of this creature.


5 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:21 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Reid and his clowns can pout their cherry lips and put on a big show . . . ain't nobody watchin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

LOL :)


6 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:22 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Anita Hill criticized President George W. Bush's standards for selecting U.S. Supreme Court justices, arguing Wednesday night that nominees are selected based on their ability to further his political agenda

Note to Anita:

THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU WIN THE HOUSE, SENATE & WHITE HOUSE!

7 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:26 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

"Anita Hill criticized President George W. Bush's standards for selecting U.S. Supreme Court justices, arguing Wednesday night that nominees are selected based on their ability to further his political agenda."

Really??

Amazing, talk about the ability to speak the obvious. That is what ever president has done.


8 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:37 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Anita who? Her fifteen minutes was up a long, long time ago!


9 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:44 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
"Anita Hill takes president to task on court picks"

Oh just shut up, harpy.

10 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:53 AM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Anita Hill's opinions are almost as important as Jimmah Carter's.

Maybe even a pubic hair more important.

11 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:57 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

And we should care what she has to say, because........?

red


12 posted on 11/03/2005 11:20:59 AM PST by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Isn't she just splitting hairs here?


13 posted on 11/03/2005 11:21:13 AM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Am I supposed to care what she thinks?????

Who knew??

14 posted on 11/03/2005 11:21:15 AM PST by kellynch (I am excessively diverted ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Anita Hill criticized President George W. Bush's standards for selecting U.S. Supreme Court justices, arguing Wednesday night that nominees are selected based on their ability to further his political agenda.

Well, Anita, I guess that calls into question YOUR political agenda with the allegations you levelled against Clarence Thomas.

15 posted on 11/03/2005 11:21:27 AM PST by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Somebody get her a can of Coke!


16 posted on 11/03/2005 11:22:06 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

That reminds me, I'm out of Diet Coke.


17 posted on 11/03/2005 11:22:11 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Anita who? Oh, her. Maybe she's disappointed that Harriet Meirs didn't have any juicy "Long Dong Silver" stories to share.
18 posted on 11/03/2005 11:23:10 AM PST by manwiththehands (Big Lie #1: "Islam is a peaceful religion"; Big Lie #2: Bush "lied")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Ms. Hill should be reminded that "It's better to be thought foolish, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."


19 posted on 11/03/2005 11:24:44 AM PST by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

20 posted on 11/03/2005 11:24:50 AM PST by day10 (Wherever you come near the human race there's layers and layers of nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson