Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

just breaking!!!!!!!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,6201,621-1,6401,641-1,660 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: thoughtomator

"And we will simply get stronger as time goes on, since we are the only ones with a positive vision for the future of America."

Bingo. What's more, we aren't willing to simply give in to McCain and Reid and everyone else...we aren't willing to run and whimper and hide and pursue the only sure losing strategy (surrender).

We won't always win. But our positive vision for America's future (like the vision of the founders) is one that deserves something greater than a preemptive, unilateral surrender.


1,621 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:01 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh, they "won" this round; but I'm not sure they realize what the "prize" is going to be.

You don't get it.

No one "won" anything. This was bad all the way around. Starting with the President's decision.

It just seems to get worse with him.

To win, I think were all going to have to wait until 08. And at this rate, were going to need a damn good candidate, and a lot of luck.

1,622 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:04 AM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

And you know this because?

Did you speak with Luttig?

Would you want to go through this process?


1,623 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:10 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (Dumbledore dies on page 596; I just saved you 20 hours and $30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1602 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

bookmark


1,624 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:16 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1619 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
Now only a very narrow range of people will ever be considered qualified for the court. They must have degrees from Harvard, Yale or one of the other elite law schools. They must have academic and/or work experience in one specific area of the law. Never again can a "common" man or woman be considered for the court. What I mean by that is someone who has come up through the world most of us live in.

The fight for this nominee is over. Stop trying to convince yourself that what happened is what you wanted to have happened.

What happened here is that "constructionist" and "verifiable" have been added as qualifications for nominees coming from a GOP President (if he wants to hold onto the GOP base). None of those other things were ever at issue, except in the strawman arguments of supporters. Do you really think we were more concerned about her SMU education than her demonstrable prediliction for supporting racist and sexist policy?

1,625 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:25 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Liberals: Get your human shields lined up quick or you'll miss the bombing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1483 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
Why should there be?

Point made.

1,626 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:48 AM PDT by Wolfstar (The reactionaries' favorite short list are all judges GWB appointed to the appellate bench.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1443 | View Replies]

To: Black Tooth; Miss Marple
"And I am in no mood to listen to those from the wrong crowd right now, that continue to say the wrong, incorrect things."

That is the most honest, informative statement yet made on the subject of the Miers nomination.

1,627 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:13 AM PDT by cake_crumb (They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1521 | View Replies]

To: MomwithHope
but she will bow out so Bush can appoint his real choice Janice Brown. After the Dems made fools of themselves over going after Harriet, they can't badger a second woman, they will let Brown sail through and Harriet will have loyally "fallen on her sword" for George.

Except, the dems didn't go after Miers, the Republicans did.
1,628 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:19 AM PDT by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies]

To: Dog

What you weren't willing to do was let the process work.

You denied her right to pass or fail on her own.


1,629 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:21 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1593 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
First all I was talking to someone else but if I must address your attack.

WWWWWelllllll just imagine if President Bush had proposed Reagan's Immigration program?? He would have been tarred and feathered because it was far more liberal than Bush's.

Quit calling people stupid!! The fight is over ok, you won; now how about being good winners??

Pray for W and Our Troops

1,630 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:24 AM PDT by bray (Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1539 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Regardless of how "hard" it was for you, you weren't willing to let the PROCESS work.

I don't think some of them realize that the PROCESS, has been thrown out the window. She deserved her hearing then an up or down vote. She deserved that much.

1,631 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:28 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1553 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
I don't have the patience to write a post that long, but I agree 100%. I disagreed with the nomination without ever calling anyone a Bushbot. I just thought we could do better, and I didn't like the fact that this nomination made Bush look weak. If I'm evil or intolerant because of that, so be it. Intolerance, like everything else in life, is not bad if used in moderation.
1,632 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:32 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1586 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I vigorously opposed this nomination. However, I have consistently prayed for the President every day of his presidency. Indeed, he needs our prayers. Probably now more than ever.


1,633 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:42 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1554 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Bush is screwed no matter what he does. If the nominee is too conservative, the liberals will block the nomination. If the nominee is too liberal, conservative Bush supporters will torpedo the nominee.

I disagree. If Bush nominates a strict constitutionalist and conservative with battle-tested, impecable, verifiable credentials (like Luttig, McConnell, Alioto, Brown, Jone, Owen, etc), he will see a tremendous outpouring of support from the conservative majority that elected him to do exactly that. It is time for Bush to stop pandering and appeasing the RINOs & DimWits because they will hate & despise him anyway. Give us a nominee that we can rally around and support, not another stealth nominee or liberal-moderate nominee like Gonzales. Do the right thing, GW Bush!

1,634 posted on 10/27/2005 8:37:49 AM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I agree.


1,635 posted on 10/27/2005 8:38:04 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1604 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

And when are Freepers like you going to realize that the continual sniping at this President adds nothing to the debate.

If you disagree on certain issues, then you will be taken serious. When you broadbrush, then your comments reek of someone who this President can never please.

Stop and think and you might find this President has actually done something you like -- what other President has had so much on his plate thanks to the previous occupant of the WH?

It behooves all of us to consider that this man has had more to deal with then anyone of us can imagine. Is he perfect, no and he will be the first to tell you so. Does he genuinely care about this Country? Damn right he does.


1,636 posted on 10/27/2005 8:38:18 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1560 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz

This isn't bickering. It's a fight over ideas. And it's healthy.


1,637 posted on 10/27/2005 8:38:24 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1588 | View Replies]

To: Black Tooth

Yep, he'll hear from all of us, but the feeling I get is he's a bit angry at the way Miers was handled.


1,638 posted on 10/27/2005 8:38:26 AM PDT by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1606 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I didn't say it was pretty. Haven't you been around long enough to know that this happens with every dispute?

The Miers fiasco was like a day at Club Med compared to the Schiavo incident.

1,639 posted on 10/27/2005 8:38:42 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Liberals: Get your human shields lined up quick or you'll miss the bombing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1576 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I'd like to believe it but somehow I don't. Surely things like limiting partial birth abortion and parental notification is popular. But if everyone got an up or down vote in the privacy of a voting booth, I expect that abortion would still be legal. Of course I live in a red state rapidly going blue and work in one of the bluest of blue states so my views might be tainted.


1,640 posted on 10/27/2005 8:38:49 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1608 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,6201,621-1,6401,641-1,660 ... 3,421-3,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson