Skip to comments.
CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!
Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
just breaking!!!!!!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,620, 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: thoughtomator
"And we will simply get stronger as time goes on, since we are the only ones with a positive vision for the future of America."
Bingo. What's more, we aren't willing to simply give in to McCain and Reid and everyone else...we aren't willing to run and whimper and hide and pursue the only sure losing strategy (surrender).
We won't always win. But our positive vision for America's future (like the vision of the founders) is one that deserves something greater than a preemptive, unilateral surrender.
To: Howlin
Oh, they "won" this round; but I'm not sure they realize what the "prize" is going to be. You don't get it.
No one "won" anything. This was bad all the way around. Starting with the President's decision.
It just seems to get worse with him.
To win, I think were all going to have to wait until 08. And at this rate, were going to need a damn good candidate, and a lot of luck.
1,622
posted on
10/27/2005 8:36:04 AM PDT
by
Black Tooth
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
And you know this because?
Did you speak with Luttig?
Would you want to go through this process?
1,623
posted on
10/27/2005 8:36:10 AM PDT
by
Dashing Dasher
(Dumbledore dies on page 596; I just saved you 20 hours and $30)
To: GOPJ
1,624
posted on
10/27/2005 8:36:16 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Wolfstar
Now only a very narrow range of people will ever be considered qualified for the court. They must have degrees from Harvard, Yale or one of the other elite law schools. They must have academic and/or work experience in one specific area of the law. Never again can a "common" man or woman be considered for the court. What I mean by that is someone who has come up through the world most of us live in. The fight for this nominee is over. Stop trying to convince yourself that what happened is what you wanted to have happened.
What happened here is that "constructionist" and "verifiable" have been added as qualifications for nominees coming from a GOP President (if he wants to hold onto the GOP base). None of those other things were ever at issue, except in the strawman arguments of supporters. Do you really think we were more concerned about her SMU education than her demonstrable prediliction for supporting racist and sexist policy?
1,625
posted on
10/27/2005 8:36:25 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Liberals: Get your human shields lined up quick or you'll miss the bombing!)
To: Pessimist
Why should there be? Point made.
1,626
posted on
10/27/2005 8:36:48 AM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(The reactionaries' favorite short list are all judges GWB appointed to the appellate bench.)
To: Black Tooth; Miss Marple
"And I am in no mood to listen to those from the wrong crowd right now, that continue to say the wrong, incorrect things."That is the most honest, informative statement yet made on the subject of the Miers nomination.
1,627
posted on
10/27/2005 8:37:13 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
To: MomwithHope
but she will bow out so Bush can appoint his real choice Janice Brown. After the Dems made fools of themselves over going after Harriet, they can't badger a second woman, they will let Brown sail through and Harriet will have loyally "fallen on her sword" for George.
Except, the dems didn't go after Miers, the Republicans did.
1,628
posted on
10/27/2005 8:37:19 AM PDT
by
Republican Red
(''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
To: Dog
What you weren't willing to do was let the process work.
You denied her right to pass or fail on her own.
To: Republic of Texas
First all I was talking to someone else but if I must address your attack.
WWWWWelllllll just imagine if President Bush had proposed Reagan's Immigration program?? He would have been tarred and feathered because it was far more liberal than Bush's.
Quit calling people stupid!! The fight is over ok, you won; now how about being good winners??
Pray for W and Our Troops
1,630
posted on
10/27/2005 8:37:24 AM PDT
by
bray
(Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
To: Howlin
Regardless of how "hard" it was for you, you weren't willing to let the PROCESS work.I don't think some of them realize that the PROCESS, has been thrown out the window. She deserved her hearing then an up or down vote. She deserved that much.
To: puroresu
I don't have the patience to write a post that long, but I agree 100%. I disagreed with the nomination without ever calling anyone a Bushbot. I just thought we could do better, and I didn't like the fact that this nomination made Bush look weak. If I'm evil or intolerant because of that, so be it. Intolerance, like everything else in life, is not bad if used in moderation.
To: ohioWfan
I vigorously opposed this nomination. However, I have consistently prayed for the President every day of his presidency. Indeed, he needs our prayers. Probably now more than ever.
To: rintense
Bush is screwed no matter what he does. If the nominee is too conservative, the liberals will block the nomination. If the nominee is too liberal, conservative Bush supporters will torpedo the nominee. I disagree. If Bush nominates a strict constitutionalist and conservative with battle-tested, impecable, verifiable credentials (like Luttig, McConnell, Alioto, Brown, Jone, Owen, etc), he will see a tremendous outpouring of support from the conservative majority that elected him to do exactly that. It is time for Bush to stop pandering and appeasing the RINOs & DimWits because they will hate & despise him anyway. Give us a nominee that we can rally around and support, not another stealth nominee or liberal-moderate nominee like Gonzales. Do the right thing, GW Bush!
To: Wolfstar
To: ConservativeDude
And when are Freepers like you going to realize that the continual sniping at this President adds nothing to the debate.
If you disagree on certain issues, then you will be taken serious. When you broadbrush, then your comments reek of someone who this President can never please.
Stop and think and you might find this President has actually done something you like -- what other President has had so much on his plate thanks to the previous occupant of the WH?
It behooves all of us to consider that this man has had more to deal with then anyone of us can imagine. Is he perfect, no and he will be the first to tell you so. Does he genuinely care about this Country? Damn right he does.
1,636
posted on
10/27/2005 8:38:18 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
To: bethtopaz
This isn't bickering. It's a fight over ideas. And it's healthy.
To: Black Tooth
Yep, he'll hear from all of us, but the feeling I get is he's a bit angry at the way Miers was handled.
1,638
posted on
10/27/2005 8:38:26 AM PDT
by
loreldan
(Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
To: Pukin Dog
I didn't say it was pretty. Haven't you been around long enough to know that this happens with
every dispute?
The Miers fiasco was like a day at Club Med compared to the Schiavo incident.
1,639
posted on
10/27/2005 8:38:42 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Liberals: Get your human shields lined up quick or you'll miss the bombing!)
To: Sloth
I'd like to believe it but somehow I don't. Surely things like limiting partial birth abortion and parental notification is popular. But if everyone got an up or down vote in the privacy of a voting booth, I expect that abortion would still be legal. Of course I live in a red state rapidly going blue and work in one of the bluest of blue states so my views might be tainted.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,620, 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson