Skip to comments.
CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!
Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
just breaking!!!!!!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,500, 1,501-1,520, 1,521-1,540 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: sinkspur
It's what they do.Yes, Sink. You're right. It's what they do. What they live for -- I've seen it many, many times first hand here in the California district where I live and volunteer on Republican election campaigns.
1,501
posted on
10/27/2005 8:19:09 AM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(The reactionaries' favorite short list are all judges GWB appointed to the appellate bench.)
To: Great Caesars Ghost
(I almost said act, but that would have been unfair)Why? It's true
To: cake_crumb
I'm switching back to Independent. That was Harriet Miers problem too - she was all over the map and no one could understand an underlying principle. If there was one.
If your highest principle is that you don't want to ever have to fight for a belief or see someone else do it, you might be happier some place else.
1,503
posted on
10/27/2005 8:19:26 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(NYT: How many times do you ask for an error to be corrected before the "error" becomes a "lie"?)
To: OXENinFLA
(For what it's worth) a local talkshow host has been saying Bush put her up to have her fail, in order to nominate a red meat conservitive.
Don't know weather I buy this or not, I throw it out to see what others say.
1,504
posted on
10/27/2005 8:19:34 AM PDT
by
Valin
(Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum)
To: Pukin Dog
Well, thanks! I am not exactly a spring chicken. LOL!
1,505
posted on
10/27/2005 8:20:08 AM PDT
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
To: COEXERJ145
Bush is screwed no matter what he does. If the nominee is too conservative, the liberals will block the nomination. If the nominee is too liberal, conservative Bush supporters will torpedo the nominee.
I would hate to be in his shoes right now.
To: Paulus Invictus
Just as I predicted. W is now perceived as severely weakened and wounded. His enemies will move in for the political kill.
And they probably won't even be polite enough to say "thanks" to the elitist conservatives.
To: sharkhawk
But I really feel sorry for the person who vetted Miers for the Court.Why feel sorry for THAT person? That person should be hammered for any contribution made on behalf of Miers...was it Andy Card? If so, shame on him! IMHO, Miers should have declined the President from the get-go.
1,508
posted on
10/27/2005 8:20:48 AM PDT
by
nfldgirl
("I love a good rant every now-n-then!")
To: Howlin
Of course they won't be behind the next pick, Howlin.
They don't support anything this President does. They don't support him any more than the leftists do.
And they get their kicks out of mocking anyone who respects him as a leader.
Their happiness is only in someone else's pain. Pray for Harriet Miers. She is an honorable woman..........a quality that these guys can't even understand.
1,509
posted on
10/27/2005 8:20:56 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(Take comfort, Friend George, God is with thee!)
To: goresalooza
"Bush needs to find another Roberts and push him/her on that paltry gang of 14."LOL! Almost nobody liked Roberts in the beginning either.
1,510
posted on
10/27/2005 8:20:56 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
To: Wolfstar
"Reactionary"?!
What's with the commie lingo.
Are you a conservative or a progressive, comrade?
1,511
posted on
10/27/2005 8:21:00 AM PDT
by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: inquest; WolfRunnerWoman
Whether or not this turns out to be a victory for the Democrats depends on what happens next. The problem is, too many conservatives are afraid of the Dems, so would be unnecessarily apprehensive about the choice of someone like Brown. But the fact is, the Democrats have no popular support for their position on this. All they have is media support, which creates the illusion of popular support.
The reason the Dems are so adamant about the judiciary is precisely that they know that their views are outside the mainstream, so they need the judiciary to impose them. Does anybody here deny this basic fact? Anybody at all? OK, so if this truth is undeniable, then what the hell are we afraid of? We can take this message to the people, and put these clowns completely on the defensive once and for all. This is truly one of those cases where the only thing to fear is (blind, irrational) fear itself.
Bears repeating! :)
We WILL pick up MORE seats in Congress if this card is played correctly!
1,512
posted on
10/27/2005 8:21:03 AM PDT
by
mosquitobite
(What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
To: Wolfstar
"You and your ilk disgust me more than I can possibly say."
snicker, chortle
To: PatriotBill
Bush hurt Bush politically. Not us. He picked her, he pick Brown to head FEMa, He has let spending go out of control, He has left our borders wide open. We did not. We are trying to save this party. If the party continues on its course we will lose at the ballot box. Simple as that. The Dems are being thought of by the public as the fiscal conservatives. Is that not a clear warning to you?
To: Young Scholar
Even though his support for Miers may have been clouded and based on a single issue (religion) and therefore wrong in principle - what he did as a Green Beret (see his tag line) in Vietnam deserves some respect.
I have stated many times on FR I do not consider Jimmy Carter a true Evangelical.
My real support for a religious judge has to do with the Souters and O'Conners. A solid believer will not change over time. One only has to look at the solid conservatives on the court; Scalia, Thomas, and Roberts. These individuals can be counted on not to change. Many of you did not see it, but Miers fits the same mold, maybe not in scholarship with Scalia or Thomas, but she is solid in her belief system. There was just too much disinformation put out about her on FR.
1,515
posted on
10/27/2005 8:21:26 AM PDT
by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham; Stellar Dendrite; flashbunny
Just tuning into the world. Power to the people! :)
1,516
posted on
10/27/2005 8:21:29 AM PDT
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Lazamataz
Keep posting; you're just showing your shallowness.
To: sinkspur
The ubers will simply move on to some other issue, where they'll plant their flag and threaten to not vote in 2006.
All 5,000 of them.
1,518
posted on
10/27/2005 8:21:32 AM PDT
by
Valin
(Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum)
To: Revolting cat!
For a second, I thought that was Bill Frist.
To: PhilipFreneau
So, it was right for Bush to nominate Souter; Reagan to nominate O'Connor and Kennedy? I don't know if I'd blame Reagan for Kennedy. The guy just turned left on certain things after being confirmed. It just wasn't predictable.
1,520
posted on
10/27/2005 8:21:46 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("She was appointed by a conservative. That ought to have been enough for us." -- NotBrilliant)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,500, 1,501-1,520, 1,521-1,540 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson