Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD 2 : SCOTUS Announcement at 9 PM (EDT)
Thread One ^ | July 19, 2005 | Me

Posted on 07/19/2005 5:06:14 PM PDT by Mo1

Edited on 07/19/2005 5:10:19 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

New thread time

Thread One


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 19july2005; johnroberts; judicialnominees; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,761-1,7801,781-1,8001,801-1,820 ... 1,921-1,939 next last
To: Pukin Dog; Torie
You always start with your best. Winning creates momentum all its own. Roberts confirmation will make it much easier for others. Were the first nominee to go down, it would be hell getting anyone through that we would like.

Well said.

This impeccably qualified man will serve as a test run for how the game is played--good preparation for the next time.

1,781 posted on 07/19/2005 8:55:34 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Constitutional conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1444 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Cubs won. I'm actually an Indians fan trapped in Cincinnati. There were more Cubs fans there than Reds fans.

Did all of the jackasses who trashed the President earlier today come in and apologize? I see there's a Bush-hater just on this page of the thread.

1,782 posted on 07/19/2005 8:55:45 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1780 | View Replies]

To: defconw
"You have no clue who you are talking to. You need to deflate your ego.

I have no idea who I'm talking to? True. Who AM I talking to? Who's ego need deflating?

1,783 posted on 07/19/2005 8:56:06 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1779 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
And Leahy and his comment about the quality of "fairness" in a nominee. To Leahy and the left FAIRNESS = NOT reversing Roe.

ABORTION is the left's RELIGION! They worship at the alter of abortion because it is their CASH COW, not only in raising campaign contributions but also in their abortion clinics. That's the real scandal no one is willing to expose!

These so-called feminists which I suggest are nothing but a bunch of ugly women who couldn't find a man willing to have sex with them if their life depended on it have been lying to young women for too many years without someone answering them! It's about time they had real opposition to their MONEY MAKING SCHEME.

1,784 posted on 07/19/2005 8:56:06 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1769 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Don't let these cheer leading lemmings who think you have no right to reserve your judgment or have critical opinion of a politician who you think might be violating the trust, and support you placed in him by way your vote, your money and your time.

These yes men/women are not the ones who can change the direction of a person, party, business or a country that is headed for failure.

They will still be cheering when the leader goes over the cliff into the abyss.

Most of them are late to the fight.

Those of us who have been fighting since the sixties have had/seen too many politicians judges,and parties turn on them and stab them in the back when they get in office.

You can spot these useful idiots when you in anyway criticize their idol they choose to worship.

They will attack you in the rudest manner, as you and others where by one, who aptly chose his name [PukinDog}who told you to STFU.

If you, I and others where wrong then we should say so.

But before we do we should be sure we are since it is worse to be wrong twice.

History will tell us that. That history that is the same source of our doubts.

Nobody wants me to be wrong anymore than I do.

This Republican Party is I would venture to say made up of better than 50% of people who in years past where former Democrats.

If we had took punkindog's and some of the others advice and STFU and be good little team players, we would still be over there cheering the Democrats on and they would still control both houses like they did for 40 years and JFK would be our President.

Any leader especially one who is leader of the Free World is subject to enormous pressures and influences who do not all have his best interest at heart. He can be steered off course.

The really good ones in industry I knew had those around him that he counted to not only support him when he was right but cared and were strong enough to tell him when they thought he was wrong.

The yes people will either follow him off the cliff or mill around at the edge wondering what happened to him.

If we expect to change our country's direction we have to not only support our elected officials but we have to hold them accountable for their performance.

1,785 posted on 07/19/2005 8:58:43 PM PDT by mississippi red-neck (You will never win the war on terrorism by fighting it in Iraq and funding it in the West Bank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Ah, to live in Missouri and know I don't have to call Kit Bond and Jim Talent for them to get their rears in gear on this issue.

Perhaps I'll make some calls to Maine...


1,786 posted on 07/19/2005 8:59:07 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Free Speech is a Right. Being Wrong is Just...Wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1751 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

And Roberts is a START. One down; two(hopefully) to go!


1,787 posted on 07/19/2005 8:59:29 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Off-the-cuff-comments are NOT CLEAR and CONVINCING evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1784 | View Replies]

To: TChad
I've never worked for the MSM.

How long have you been studying politics and government?

1,788 posted on 07/19/2005 8:59:36 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; All
Judge Roberts needs your help to be confirmed [Townhall.com]
1,789 posted on 07/19/2005 8:59:39 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

LIFO versus FIFO. That's a bean counter term. One is the correct accounting method here, and one isn't. And there is no clearly right answer here. You have a point (along with others), I have a point, and you have a point, and you're OK, and I'm OK. Cheers. :)


1,790 posted on 07/19/2005 9:00:07 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1781 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

LOL, I grew up in Cleveland! Do you remember Duane Kuiper? Joe Charbenau, Rick Manning? LOL, None of the hysterics are apologizing, and I have another hard core righty giving me a hard time! It's OK, it's good to be sane!


1,791 posted on 07/19/2005 9:00:08 PM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1782 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Lucky Dog! I only have one to call, not that it will matter!


1,792 posted on 07/19/2005 9:01:37 PM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1786 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Actually, yes! The Rangers beat the Yankees tonight!


1,793 posted on 07/19/2005 9:02:28 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1778 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; All
NARAL: Roberts Will Overturn Roe v. Wade - ("feminazis" screaming for scalps already!)
1,794 posted on 07/19/2005 9:02:39 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

GO AWAY! Is That Ambiguous? I don't care what you think!


1,795 posted on 07/19/2005 9:03:03 PM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1783 | View Replies]

To: defconw

You are a ridiculous fool with your little "show"


1,796 posted on 07/19/2005 9:03:19 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1792 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
I left the thread six hours ago to see the Reds - Cubs game; did I miss anything?

Who won?

1,797 posted on 07/19/2005 9:06:08 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1778 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Worse -- I remember Victor Cruz, Sid Monge, and Julio Franco at 21. I suffered through Cory Snyder swinging at pitches a foot outside the strike zone. I saw Pat Corrales try to karate-kick Dave Stewart. The best moment was Jose Canseco coco-butting a baseball over the wall for a home run. (For that matter, do you remember the coco-butt on Championship Wrestling w/ John Powers and Jack Reynolds?)


1,798 posted on 07/19/2005 9:07:03 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1791 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Hello Salvation - Wikepedia also has more info on Roberts.

John Glover Roberts, Jr. (born January 27, 1955) is an American attorney, jurist, and political figure. He is a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

On July 19, 2005, Roberts was nominated by President George W. Bush to replace Sandra Day O'Connor as an Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, who retired pending the confirmation of a replacement on July 1. Roberts was originally intended to be named by Bush in a live, nationwide television broadcast at 9 p.m. EST, but the choice was reported by the Associated Press at 7:47 p.m. EST, 73 minutes before the official announcment. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, he will take office for a lifetime term.

Roberts is 50 years old and the first Supreme Court nominee in 11 years. He is a practicing Catholic. He has three sisters, has a wife named Jane, and has two children, Jack and Josie.
Roberts was born in Buffalo, New York, and gre up in Indiana. He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1976 and received his law degree from Harvard Law School in 1979.

After graduation, Roberts became a law clerk for Henry Friendly on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and held this post until the following year. From 1980 to 1981, he was a law clerk to then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court.

From 1981 to 1982, Roberts was a Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney General—William French Smith, under President Ronald Reagan—at the U.S. Department of Justice. In 1982, Roberts became the Associate Counsel to the President, and held this post until 1986.

Roberts entered private practice in 1986 as an associate at the Washington, D.C.-based Hogan & Hartson law firm, but left to serve under George H.W. Bush in the Department of Justice from 1989 to 1993 as Principal Deputy Solicitor General. In this capacity, he argued about 39 cases before the Supreme Court, winning 25.

In 1992, Roberts was nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, but was opposed by Democrats and never received a vote. Roberts returned to Hogan & Harston as a partner in 1993 after Bush was defeated by Bill Clinton in the 1992 presidential election.

Roberts was renominated to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia by President George W. Bush on January 7, 2001, to replace James L. Buckley. He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on May 8 and received commission on June 2, 2003.

On July 19, 2005, Roberts was nominated by President George W. Bush to replace Sandra Day O'Connor as an Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, who retired pending the confirmation of a replacement on July 1. Roberts was originally intended to be named by Bush in a live, nationwide television broadcast at 9 p.m. EST, in the East Room of the White House, but the choice was leaked and was reported by the Associated Press at 7:47 p.m. EST, 73 minutes before the official announcement. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, he will take office for a lifetime term.

John Roberts is currently a member of both the Federalist Society and the National Legal Center For The Public Interest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Roberts_Jr.


1,799 posted on 07/19/2005 9:07:11 PM PDT by MonitorMaid (It is not freedom which permits the Trojan Horse to be wheeled within the gates...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1482 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Good points ... if anyone was ever one of "us" (pro-life conservatives), it is Meese.


1,800 posted on 07/19/2005 9:07:20 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1772 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,761-1,7801,781-1,8001,801-1,820 ... 1,921-1,939 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson