HILLARY LOSES HER WAY

New York Post ^ | 1/07/05

[kattracks]

So much for the new, moderate — dare we say centrist — Hillary Rod ham Clinton.

Yesterday she lined up with her party's moonbat "They-Stole-Ohio" caucus to headline the first formal congressional challenge to a presidential election since 1877 — only to see the effort, in equal measures baseless and slanderous, fail spectacularly.

Thus the second inauguration of George W. Bush as president of the United States will proceed on schedule Jan. 20.

No doubt visions of her own installation are dancing in Hillary's head; that could explain her flirtation with the grassy-knoll commandos of her party's left wing: They work hard for their candidates in presidential primaries.

[snip]

Even Hillary voted to certify the results — but not before a seismic fracture between herself and her colleague from New York, Sen. Chuck Schumer, appeared:

* Said Schumer: "My view is that you don't hold up the election unless there is concrete real evidence of fraud. I haven't seen that."

* Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio."

Schumer, of course, is correct.

There is no evidence of fraud in the Ohio outcome. None.

[snip]

Clinton and her Democratic colleagues yesterday alleged — without actually saying so, of course — that November's election was stolen.

And that's simply outrageous.

[Once-Ler]

She won nothing today. She'd have the base in a new york minute. She doesn't need to pander to them. The people she needs to win she continues to alienate.

It's all about money right now. Hillary may run for reelection in 06. She may run for Prez in 08 and still retain her seat if she loses. This move did not hurt her in NY, and 4 years is a long time for voters to forget.

If Hillary wants to win in 2008 she needs money. Lots and lots and lots of money...to win re-election in the Senate, the presidential primaries, and the general election. I would need to use a lifeline - phone a friend to find out for sure, but I believe Hillary can raise money as a Senator from NY and use it to run for President. Tomorrow the direct mail from Sen Clinton goes out to President Clinton's donor list.

[Route101]

Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio." ....Earth to Hilly!!!...your a good one to talk about integrity!!!...sniff my shorts!

[Jimmy Valentine]

"her resume she would submit to be President, IS A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER."

I beg to differ.

Her resume is rather, a compendium of political thuggery, egregious dishonesty, and manifest indifference and disdain for the laws of this country.

That she has not been indicted and sentenced to extended jail terms several times is a mystery to those of us constrained to play by the rules.

Regards,

[monocle]

The recent recounts and the challenge to the confirmation of Bush's victory were not undertaken by the Democrats to achieve true counts, but to provide cover for the Democrats for past, present and future frauds. The Democrats are attempting to create a lasting impression that Republicans are solely responsible for imperfect elections.

[monocle]

The recent recounts and the challenge to the confirmation of Bush's victory were not undertaken by the Democrats to achieve true counts, but to provide cover for the Democrats for past, present and future frauds. The Democrats are attempting to create a lasting impression that Republicans are solely responsible for imperfect elections.

[libs_kma]

"Will we be able to render the MSM irrelevant enough by then to negate the propaganda effectively enough to prevent her from winning. That's what it will all come down to."

I think a good deal of that was done with the 2004 election. It was scary to say the least, that enough people would believe the old media about Kerry which they didn't. And the old media's advantage there was that he started out an unknown outside of MA.

But with Hildebeast, if the old media fawn all over her, the people will pick up on that in a second. She's too well known for what they did with Kerry to work for her. Every sugar-coated story will be met with cynicism by pretty much everybody, and send the old media even further down that slippery slope.

I think they blew their chance with Kerry and it wasn't enough. And they've put people on notice as to how far they will go.

[Jim Noble]

Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio."

Hannity and Rush are wrong about this, I think.

She's not sucking up to the DUmmies.

This is part of a carefully thought out, post-Florida 2000 strategy to discredit simple arithmetical counting of real votes by legal voters as the cast-iron bottom line of who wins and who loses.

What the real leaders of Boxer's silly little tantrum seek is twofold: First, that people wake up the day after an election, with all the votes counted, and say "I wonder who really won?"

Second, the proliferation of laws for election contests, ballot challenges, election courts and election judges. They want to put elections under the direct control of the Federal government unstead of under the unreviewable control of the People in their localities.

The reason they want this is simple: It's much easier for them to prevail in the courts or in a protracted, lawyer-driven "post-election" process than it is on election day.

It was insanity to collaborate in the "Help America Vote Act" to fix fictitious problems with the Florida 2000 vote. The only problem in Florida was that the democrats lost, and lacked the post-election cheating tools to recover in time.

NOW, they are willing to try to discredit a 100 000+ vote win, while affirming their 100-vote win in WA as sacrosanct.

This is going to get worse and worse, no doubt with the help of stupid Congressional Republicans.

There are no problems with the voting.

There are no problems with the voting.

There are no problems with the voting.

[philman_36]

HILLARY LOSES HER WAY
You can't lose what you never had.
She always has "The Third Way".

[johnny7]

Hillary has this unfortunate(?) flaw in her character that no matter how hard she works at hiding her radical, socialist wickedness ... she eventually commits a gaffe that exposes it.

I think it's a Freudian-thing... going back to her childhood, something akin to getting the attention of an unaffected father.

Given our corrupt and compromised MSM, this 'flaw' may be the only thing that keeps her out of the White House.

[Darkwolf377]

I think your analys is good, but in the end you and Rush and Hannity come to the same place, because doing as you describe IS sucking up to the DUmmie contingent. Check out the DUmmie FUnnies posted here and you'll see they're following the belief system you've accurately described.

[txrangerette]

her party's moonbat "They-Stole-Ohio" caucus

her flirtation with the grassy-knoll commandos of her party's left wing

Good descriptions by the Post Editor, but I liked Tom Delay's most of all - "THE X-FILE WING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY".

Unbeatable, IMO!

[livius]

the media will rally around her and launch a propaganda campaign the likes of which the world has never seen

Excellent point. We should be prepared for it.

[Brian Allen]

I liked what you said, Eagle, so much that here it is again!

<< Hillary is the embodiment of many ugly things, including the stupidity, weakness and emptiness of the Dem party. Making it worse, this wanna-be is TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY, as was her so-called husband, as he clearly demonstrated during eight years of darkness upon the Oval Office.

Let her loose - keep the fool Marxist talking - she is ONLY THERE BECAUSE OF HER "husband" -- her resume she would submit to be President, IS A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER. The libs have degenerated to nothing but a bunch of whining street thugs, spraying negativism, hate, and anti-Americanism in every direction. They will foreever be a black mark in our history books, at least the ones they cannot rewrite ..... >>

[Gritty]

Weiner — and Sen. Clinton — need to get a little perspective. It's not always about winning.

Maybe to the editors of the New York Post it's not. To hillary it is.

hillary may be a total witch and a totalitarian bitch but there is no doubt she and her assembled court-in-waiting is a crafty one. She doesn't tilt with windmills. She runs them.

She is making herself all things to all people plus setting a precedent for her run in 2008. If she loses in the polls it may be possible she can win it all in the Congress if the Democrats can get their majorities back. This little flap will be long forgotten and buried by the time 2008 rolls around - but the precedent won't.

This sets a precedent - a good one - for her to gain her ambitions!

[sr4402]

This sets a precedent - a good one - for her to gain her ambitions!

'I'm not ambitious, I just want to take over the country.'

/Sarcasm OFF

[Salvation]

I hope no one finds her! </sarcasm

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

America's Enemy Within HILLARY was on the side of our Terrrorist Enemy Communist Vietnam Dictator HO CHI MINH and against US during the Vietnam War.

During the 1990's HILLARY's White House refused 3 Free Offers from the Sudan to hand over our Terrorist Enemy OSAMA bin LADEN to US on a silver platter. Offers if taken would have prevented the Attacks of September 11, 2001 ahead of time.

The day after HILLARY won her New York Senate Seat in 2000 she vowed to destroy our Electoral College System.

Senator BOXER, who personally lead Anti-U.S. Demonstrations to shut down the City Government of San Francisco during the Vietnam War, is merely a voicebox for HILLARY.

Read RICHARD POE's outstanding book:

'HILLARY's Secret War: The CLINTONS Conspiracy to Muzzle Internet Journalists'

...WE on the Internet...

....REMEMBER EVERYTHING,

.....and HILLARY knows it..!!!

.

[Lazamataz]

One issue, and one issue only, will determine whether Spawnette O'Satan wins the presidency in 2008. For no matter what she says or what she does, when it gets a bit closer, the media will rally around her and launch a propaganda campaign the likes of which the world has never seen. She will figure out what she must claim to be in order to win, and the media will blow it completely out in an effort to convince the public that she is the person to meet that need, the person who will be the greatest leader in the history of the universe. The one issue is this: Will we be able to render the MSM irrelevant enough by then to negate the propaganda effectively enough to prevent her from winning. That's what it will all come down to

Well analyzed.

[EagleUSA]

Her resume is rather, a compendium of political thuggery, egregious dishonesty, and manifest indifference and disdain for the laws of this country.

That she has not been indicted and sentenced to extended jail terms several times is a mystery to those of us constrained to play by the rules.
======
You capture the essence and beauty of Hitlery very well. You have actually been very kind :-) -- probably a few Presidentail pardons kept her out of the slammer...kind of like Carl Rich..another FINE INDIVIDUAL OF THE CLINTON ILK.

[TigersEye]

* Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio."

I find no fault in this statement except that it includes Ohio. Let's look at elections in WA, WI, PA and other states where Kerry and other Dems won by a tiny fractional margin.