Hannity and Rush are wrong about this, I think.
She's not sucking up to the DUmmies.
This is part of a carefully thought out, post-Florida 2000 strategy to discredit simple arithmetical counting of real votes by legal voters as the cast-iron bottom line of who wins and who loses.
What the real leaders of Boxer's silly little tantrum seek is twofold: First, that people wake up the day after an election, with all the votes counted, and say "I wonder who really won?"
Second, the proliferation of laws for election contests, ballot challenges, election courts and election judges. They want to put elections under the direct control of the Federal government unstead of under the unreviewable control of the People in their localities.
The reason they want this is simple: It's much easier for them to prevail in the courts or in a protracted, lawyer-driven "post-election" process than it is on election day.
It was insanity to collaborate in the "Help America Vote Act" to fix fictitious problems with the Florida 2000 vote. The only problem in Florida was that the democrats lost, and lacked the post-election cheating tools to recover in time.
NOW, they are willing to try to discredit a 100 000+ vote win, while affirming their 100-vote win in WA as sacrosanct.
This is going to get worse and worse, no doubt with the help of stupid Congressional Republicans.
There are no problems with the voting.
There are no problems with the voting.
There are no problems with the voting.
I think your analys is good, but in the end you and Rush and Hannity come to the same place, because doing as you describe IS sucking up to the DUmmie contingent. Check out the DUmmie FUnnies posted here and you'll see they're following the belief system you've accurately described.
"What the real leaders of Boxer's silly little tantrum seek is twofold: First, that people wake up the day after an election, with all the votes counted, and say "I wonder who really won?"
Isn't BaBoxer related to the Clintons by marriage or blood? DiFi is as well, IIRC....