Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pres. Bush Vote Total Now Exceeds 62 Million (exceeding all pre-election estimates).
SOS websites | 12/10/2004 | calreaganfan

Posted on 12/10/2004 5:24:36 PM PST by calreaganfan

The conventional wisdom of the political punditry has been proven wrong again. A huge national voter turnout was thought to favor the Democrat candidate, but Pres. Bush's national popular vote count from the Nov. 2, 2004 general election has now exceeded 62 million votes. As of 12/10/04, Pres. Bush has received 62,019,003 votes. The states of NY and PA have certified their official results in the past two days which pushed Pres. Bush's vote count over the 62 million mark. CA will certify its results tomorrow, but almost all CA votes are already included in the Bush total (by obtaining vote counts from CA county websites). Only MN, ME and a few other states have yet to certify their official results.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushvictory; electionreturns; mediawingofthednc; napalminthemorning; partyofthehindparts; popularvote; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-216 next last
To: goldstategop
Shattering Ronaldus Magnus all-time record of votes received in 1984 which was 54 million.

Why do people keep saying this... Doesn't the fact that the population of the United States is much higher mean anything? In the year 2075 when the US population is 600 million people, will it be a big deal that George W. Bush VI got 200 million votes?

41 posted on 12/10/2004 6:19:38 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons

"Where do you go to find out the % of voter turnout? Is there a site that lists the current # of ligible voters, so we can do the math?"

I may have been incorrect when I stated that the 2004 voter turnout exceeded 60% of the VAP. After checking the US Census Bureau information for the Nov. 2002 election, I was surprised to see that the estimate of the total VAP was 210,000,000. Using this estimate and a projected 122.5 million voters in 2004, the VAP % was approximately 58.5%.
http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/voting/p20-552/tab02-1.pdf


42 posted on 12/10/2004 6:19:46 PM PST by calreaganfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons

Good find. I didn't even look that closely as I figured it wasn't published yet.....


43 posted on 12/10/2004 6:20:54 PM PST by deport (I've done a lot things.... seen a lot of things..... Most of which I don't remember.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

The only meaningful statistic is the PERCENTAGE of the current population.


44 posted on 12/10/2004 6:20:57 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: calreaganfan

Tonight on Cavuto, good old Bob Beckel made a statement which sounded something like "3-400,000 vote difference" shouldn't be enough to cause the dems to be in such a state. I kinda blinked .. what did he say? But .. Neil didn't challenge him on the statement.


45 posted on 12/10/2004 6:21:37 PM PST by CyberAnt (Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

"Why do people keep saying this [breaking Reagan's vote record]. Doesn't the fact that the population of the United States is much higher mean anything?"

The reason it's a big deal to break Pres. Reagan's record is because in 1984, Pres. Reagan received nearly 60% of the popular vote. The fact that Pres. Bush, who received less than 51% of the popular vote, has broken Reagan's record by nearly 8 million votes is truly astounding. It's a further indication of the massive voter turnout in the 2004 election.


46 posted on 12/10/2004 6:23:22 PM PST by calreaganfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons

The question of VAP turnout depends on the total of the Voting Age Population (excluding ineligible voters). Using the GMU estimate of 203.9 million, it is possible that the 2004 voter turnout will exceed 60%. If the national popular vote total reaches 122.5 million, then the 60% threshhold will have been reached. P.S.: The US Census Bureau is showing a higher # for VAP.


47 posted on 12/10/2004 6:30:20 PM PST by calreaganfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"The real election will begin and end Monday when the Electoral College convenes across the country to cast its vote."

I was going to ask when that was going to happen. Thanks


48 posted on 12/10/2004 6:35:23 PM PST by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bormijitsu

TROLL


49 posted on 12/10/2004 6:35:34 PM PST by prairiebreeze (It's my right to publically celebrate Christmas and state my faith in Christ. At least for now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bormijitsu; Admin Moderator

clean up aisle 3


50 posted on 12/10/2004 6:36:15 PM PST by prairiebreeze (It's my right to publically celebrate Christmas and state my faith in Christ. At least for now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: calreaganfan
You are analyzing this election as have tried so hard to bring peoples attention to the 2000 election.

Gore won more votes in Los Angeles County, Calif. Than he had over the whole country.

He received 838,575 more votes in that one county than Bush. So is that the county that elected him.


In 2000 In the two states [N.Y. - Ca] Gore had 2,545,972 more votes that Bush.

It just tells me most of the people are not Democrats.

Frannie
52 posted on 12/10/2004 6:58:10 PM PST by frannie (I REPEAT --THE TRUTH WILL SET US ALL FREE--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bormijitsu; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; KangarooJacqui; The Scourge of Yazid; ...

Sniff, sniff...


53 posted on 12/10/2004 6:59:05 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Sniff, sniff...

Isn't this so sad... Full teeth grin.

54 posted on 12/10/2004 7:03:13 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Free the Fallujah one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bormijitsu
President Bush said that he had NO dealings with the Swiftees;he didn't ever repudiate what they were saying,nor refute them.

Kerry and his team colluded with the Dem 527s.Liberals wanted the president to disavow the Swiftees,but they would disavow nor repudiate their own 527s.

The only thing you got right,is that you're confused.

55 posted on 12/10/2004 7:05:04 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bormijitsu
I'm confused. Didn't the President and Vice President refute the Swifties and assert up and down that they respected Kerry's service?

No dear. President Bush said that he respected those who served and would say nothing about Kerrys military service.

The Swift Boat Vets were not refuted.

I have no doubt The President did agree but like a gentleman did not want to make it the focus of his campaign. He instead chose to run a positive and upbeat campaign on what he planed to do in his second term.

56 posted on 12/10/2004 7:05:15 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum europe vincendarum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: calreaganfan

This is GREAT news! :-)


57 posted on 12/10/2004 7:05:41 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason; bormijitsu
Hmmmm. Lime Cat is suspicious...


58 posted on 12/10/2004 7:06:50 PM PST by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno-World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The RNC did a fantastic job this time out, IMO. They still have a ways to go in immeatiatly countering liberal spin on the talking head shows but now, at least, the have a solid GOTV strategy.

Now the work really begins.


59 posted on 12/10/2004 7:07:48 PM PST by Duke Nukum (When there is no room in Hell, the U.N. elect Bill Clinton as their president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Ozone?????????????? :-)


60 posted on 12/10/2004 7:08:47 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson