John Kerry's Bodyguard of Lies

TAS ^ | 8/12/04 | Thomas Lipscomb

[pookie18]

NEW YORK -- Winston Churchill often repeated Stalin's observation that "in wartime truth is so precious that she should always be attended to be a bodyguard of lies." And now that the Democratic National Convention has ended with Kerry's acceptance speech concentrating on his four month service in the Vietnam War 35 years ago, rather than his service during the past 35 years, it appears particularly appropriate.

One of the pesky IRS Code 527 organizations that now buzz through the campaign atmosphere like insatiable horseflies in the aftermath of McCain-Finegold reforms has had the presumption to raise some serious questions about the truth of John Kerry's Vietnam wartime service.

Called "Swift Boat Veterans For Truth," the group has a website, airs TV ads running in key "battleground" states, and has published a book. The conniving and self-promoting lies of the John Kerry it portrays make Sammy Glick look like a rank amateur.

If the incidents it details are true, Kerry was a coward who fled in battle having unintentionally thrown his current supporter, Jim Rassmann, overboard in his panic. Kerry tried to get his first Purple Heart on the basis of a tiny self-inflicted wound from his own grenade. His supporter, Max Cleland, accidentally blew both his legs off and one hand off with one of his own grenades, but never asked for a Purple Heart because, just as in John Kerry's case, there was no enemy action at the time. Kerry went behind the back of the commander who refused his medal request and the doctor who had treated him, and got one anyway.

Swiftvet officers watched this kind of behavior for four months into Kerry's 12 month "tour of duty." Then three of them told him pointedly that he'd better use the three Purple Heart escape clause and return to the States fast. Kerry left the next morning. And those are just a few of charges the Swiftvets are making. It certainly is a very different picture of the war hero than his campaign has been painting of their JFK: John Forbes Kerry -- but this time as John "Flashman" Kerry.

"CONSIDER THE SOURCE" INVITED Kerry campaign spokesman Luis Vizcaino. And last week Marc Elias, General Counsel for Kerry-Edwards 2000, and Joseph Sandler, General Counsel for the Democratic National Committee sent a hurried and semi-hysterical letter warning television stations not to run Swift Boat Vets ads setting out their definition of "the source" It is well worth reading as a reductio of Kerry campaign logic.

"The group is a sham organization," it points out. Yet the Swift Boat Veterans had been organized months earlier with the IRS and Federal Election Commission, just like MoveOn.org and dozens of other 527s, and was no more "sham" than they were. As a matter of fact they had elected to remain unincorporated under the regulation and take the risk of being perhaps the only 527 in which its members were willing to accept personal liability for their actions, unlike MoveOn which had compared Bush to Hitler. The Swiftvets are either very brave or very dumb.

"The advertisement contains statements by men who purport to have served on Senator Kerry's SWIFT Boat in Vietnam. they pretend to have served with Senator Kerry. ." Actually nothing in the ad calls any of the men it cites as being Kerry's crew members. And there can be no doubt they "served with Senator Kerry" in the same Coastal Group 11 at the same time. Worse still, 16 out of the 23 surviving officers and commanders who served with Kerry at the base now claim he is unfit for command, much less to become commander in chief of the U.S. Armed Forces. And the Swiftvets claim to have a total of 254 members who served from Seaman to Admiral in Kerry's Coastal Squadron 1, including several of Kerry's commanding officers and some sailors who had been on Kerry's boat.

"Fake 'witnesses' speaking on behalf of a phony organization."? Swiftboat service was not a lone wolf operation. Kerry's boat ran in tandem with other Swiftboats who were anywhere from 10 to a couple of dozen yards away, rather like World War II aircraft using formations to protect one another in combat. So the crews and commanders of other boats during Kerry's operations were witnesses all right. They kept a keen eye on anything another boat was doing, right or wrong-particularly since the mistakes of another boat could threaten their own survival. And boat commanders like Kerry, rather than enlisted crew members of his or any other crew, were more likely to have the best understanding of how the mission was being performed by another commander.

"The entire advertisement, therefore, is an inflammatory, outrageous lie". and should stations run it anyway."your station is responsible for the false and libelous charges made by this sponsor." Remarkable. On the face of the simple facts recited above, Elias and Sandler may have written the first legal letter in campaign history that actually commits the violations it charges its target with. making "false and libelous charges." It also raises a clear question of tortious interference with existing and proposed contracts between Swiftvets and the stations they had lined up to run the ads.

THEN THERE ARE THE "chilling effect" First Amendment violations of Swiftvets' perfectly ordinary 527 conduct in using its donors' funds to make its point of view heard without supporting a particular candidate. Ironically the real question is, who do Elias and Sandler represent? Who retained them? From their signatures as General Counsel it appears that both are working on behalf of and being paid by the taxpayer-funded Kerry campaign

But to do what? To threaten television stations that they may be sued for libel, purely on the basis of Kerry campaign assertions of false statements by individuals who are likely lack actual malice and were certainly in a position to have relevant opinions, if fallible memories, of events that happened 35 years ago? This is long before Kerry had any professional association with the Democratic Party. Let's assume Elias and Sandler are absolutely correct in their assertions and there is no statute of limitations on this kind of outrageous libel (there is, and it has passed). Isn't this Kerry's personal case to prosecute, not the Democratic Party's?

What if, for example, the Democrats had decided to run commercials based on what they felt was valid information attacking Richard Nixon for getting rich by cheating his shipmates at poker on those boring supply runs in the South Pacific during his naval service 25 years earlier and perhaps running a black market operation on the side out of naval stores at various ports? Should the Republican Party have used donor money to prosecute a case that has nothing to do with Nixon's political service?

Whatever the truth of the Swiftvets charges, they are a credible organization and their members were certainly in a position to have informed opinions. And in their unincorporated 527 status they are easy to sue and they are now on the record. So where are all the lawsuits against them for libel? Imagine the awards John Edwards' trial lawyer buddies can get out of an operation which, according to Al Hunt -- in one of his most embarrassingly often wrong but never in doubt rants, is "significantly funded and directed by Texas fatcats and political operatives."

In the New Republic yesterday, a naif named Kenneth Baer begs the Democratic Party to commence a major lawsuit against the Swiftvets for libel, lèse majesté, whatever. And given the sloppy work Elias and Sandler have done so far, that would be the answer to the Swiftvets' prayers. Wait till those expedited depositions start to leak -- forget the trial. Baer was a speechwriter for Al Gore. He runs "a Democratic consulting firm." The GOP should be so lucky as to have him gain influence.

In the meantime, Dick Morris, John McCain, Bill O'Reilly and others should stop twittering about how rude and crass and dishonorable and counterproductive it is to even explore such nasty possibilities in public and take a look at the charges and supporting documentation brought forth by the Swiftvets. Does it matter whether they are funded by Richard Mellon Scaife, George Soros, or The Tooth Fairy? What does matter in a close presidential election is if there is significant evidence that some or all of the Vietnam service Kerry has elected to make the center of his campaign to move from "war hero" to "war president" is a tissue of lies.

And it is time for the press to look into the charges brought by the Swiftvets. The Swiftvets have depositions, phone numbers, on the record statements, and for all of the innuendo from the Kerry apparatchiks, not one of the Swiftvets has enjoyed a fancy hotel room paid for by the Bush campaign, much less gone on a campaign tour with the candidate. It is easy to see what the nine Kerry crew members are getting out of their 15 minutes of fame. But what's in it for the 254 Swiftvets? It is important to answer that question in considering their charges.

Thomas Lipscomb was the chairman of the New York Vietnam Veterans' Leadership Program which worked to develop employment of heavily minority area veterans. He is the founder of Times Books.

[Deb]

Good one, Tom!

[Deb]

The Winston Churchill quote makes no sense. I assume there's a typo.

[pookie18]

Did a Google search...most results (but not all) replace "to be" with "by".

[Deb]

Has to be.

[Khurkris]

another good post in a very rich field of items coming in.

[Remington Rebel]

an the damn brits dont speak out language anyhow ;^)

just kidding im gratful for their support in Iraq

[USMCVet]

"in wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies."

This is an excellent article but like a number of others like it, misses the central point: Kerry went from his four months in Vietnam to assist the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong enemy by leading efforts against his "band of brothers".

He lied in his testimony before Congress against us - how would he have known anything about the quality or honor of our (infantry) service in Vietnam? He was a "boat driver" in rivers - he never came anywhere near the real combat! Then he met with respresentatives of the enemy in Paris while we were still at war. Doesn't that constitute treason?

Dick Morris and the Leftist-Democratic choir have successfully deflected attention from Kerry's most serious deficiencies.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

And it is time for the press to look into the charges brought by the Swiftvets. The Swiftvets have depositions, phone numbers, on the record statements, and for all of the innuendo from the Kerry apparatchiks, not one of the Swiftvets has enjoyed a fancy hotel room paid for by the Bush campaign, much less gone on a campaign tour with the candidate. It is easy to see what the nine Kerry crew members are getting out of their 15 minutes of fame. But what's in it for the 254 Swiftvets? It is important to answer that question in considering their charges.

Pass around to EVERYone you've ever known. :)

[Pharmboy]

When the campaign started, I thought that Kerry was merely another demonrat liberal hack. But now it is clear that this guy is dangerous loser. He's done.

Thanks for posting.

[an amused spectator]

Kampuchea Kerry bump back to you, Deb. :-)

[alwaysconservative]

Excellent article bump!

[alwaysconservative]

Excellent article bump!

[RogueIsland]

As a matter of fact they had elected to remain unincorporated under the regulation and take the risk of being perhaps the only 527 in which its members were willing to accept personal liability for their actions

I didn't know that. These guys have some brass ones, I'll give them that. Nice to know there are still guys like this left in the world.

[BillyCrockett]

And the SwiftVets story keeps going, and going, and going...

[kabar]

He was a "boat driver" in rivers - he never came anywhere near the real combat!

I agree with most of what you said, but the PCFs and PBRs on the rivers had one of the highest casualty rates of any units in Vietnam. It is demeaning to say that they were not anywhere near real combat nor is it true.

[RogueIsland]

In the meantime, Dick Morris, John McCain, Bill O'Reilly and others should stop twittering about how rude and crass and dishonorable and counterproductive it is to even explore such nasty possibilities in public and take a look at the charges and supporting documentation brought forth by the Swiftvets.

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for O'Reilly to deign to educate himself about a topic before disgorging his opinion about it on national television.

[BlueLancer]

"...but this time as John "Flashman" Kerry."

They've taken the name of the great man ... Harry Flashman .. in vain!

The Flashman Papers: a summary

Understanding the biggest rogue ever to pull on a pair of Cherrypickers.

During the Victorian era Harry Flashman fled like a rabbit, toadied like a fawning lapdog and whored his way like a prime bull to undeserved military success and fame for over half a century without getting caught out ... almost, for Harry was never out of trouble for long for all his experience getting struck down by the dirty end of fortune's wand so to speak - he never learns to keep to the straight and narrow path of righteousness, which for us is a great fortune since he would have never been kicked out of Rugby, ridden with the Light Brigade at Balaclava, taken part in the Indian Mutiny, met Otto Bismarck, Abraham Lincoln, and Queen Victoria herself; if these things had not taken place the Victorian era would have been different, and we would not have the Flashman Papers to enjoy and study!

A coward, a Cad; chronically unfaithful to his beautiful and devoted(sic) wife, to whom he is hopeless and ardently attached. A paragon of Victorian manhood; a lying adulterer who cheats at billiards. A bully. A cheat, thief and playactor. Unwilling hero in the biggest battles and events of the British Empire. Sir Harry Flashman; VC; KCB; KCIE; the hero of George Macdonald Fraser's Flashman Papers.

[IamConservative]

"But now it is clear that this guy is dangerous loser. "

Think about the psychology of this man. He decided 35 years ago - when (according to Ann Coulter) he filmed his exploits in Vietnam and upon leaving announced his goal to be President - to use his Vietnam service to validate his candidacy. He never mentions his professional experience in the intervening 35 years. Prosecutor (or DA?), Lt. Governor and United States Senator. Who in their right mind would "apply for a job" and base their fitness and suitability for the task on a four month experience from 35 years ago?

Indeed, who in their right mind would hire such a person.

[WaterDragon]

Whew! I'm sure I found this post, pookie. This is a great article by Lipscomb, and it should be read by everyone.

I don't think Kerry or the DNC will be suing the Swiftvets, and after reading this column, I understand why!