Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Wallace Turns WWII Memorial into Anti-Bush Bash
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/01/04 | Carl Limbacher and the NewsMax.com staff

Posted on 06/01/2004 6:21:27 PM PDT by kattracks

It was supposed to be an event where World War II-era journalists could swap war stories and bask in the glory of the soon-to-be christened WWII memorial on Washington, D.C.'s mall.

But it didn't take long for CBS "60 Minutes" star Mike Wallace and USA Today founder Al Neuharth, who had been invited to address the crowd, to turn Friday's WWII reminiscence into bash-Bush rally.

Wallace began innocently enough, telling the crowd that in WWII, "We knew what we were fighting for. We knew how important it was. We loved our country. We loved our commander-in-chief.

"And when Pearl Harbor came and we finally got in, it was a damn good thing that we did," the veteran newsman recalled.

But then Wallace turned abruptly political:

"I look at where we are today and I say to myself, I wouldn't want to - this is not, in my estimation, a good war. . . . George Washington was commander-in-chief and president of the United States. Franklin Roosevelt was commander-in-chief and president of the United States. I don't have to persuade anybody of the validity of those two guys."

But when it came to President Bush, the CBS newsman lamented:

"I don't know how we got into a position where our present commander-in-chief and the people around him had the guts to take our kids and send them on what seems to be - it sure is not a noble enterprise."

At that point some in the audience, annoyed at Wallace's attempt to politicize what was supposed to be a WWII commemoration, began heckling him.

USA Today's Al Neuwarth stepped in and tried to calm the waters by noting that "all wars are bad wars." But within minutes, he too was bashing Bush.

"I'm proud of every veteran in this country, who fought in any of [the wars]. That includes Iraq," Neuharth announced. "But I must agree with [Mike] - we stumbled and bumbled our way into this war."

The USA Today founder complained, "That decision was not made by the troops who are over there fighting and dying. It was made in the Oval Office. And I think it does raise a question of whether we were absolutely right when our Founding Fathers said that the president of the United States shall be the commander-in-chief of our military forces.

Neuharth continued:

"They were right with George Washington. He had been a military person. But I'm not sure whether a non-military commander-in-chief, no matter which party he's from and no matter who he or she is, has the background or the instincts to take us to war."

At that point boos again erupted from the crowd and moderator Thomas Doherty tried to get the event back on track. But it was too late for many.

Square One Media Network's Kathryn Serkes was on hand and she tells NewsMax that at least 50 attendees got up and stormed out because of Wallace and Neuharth's partisan antics.

Although the event was televised by C-Span, the network declined to archive the video on its web site. NewsMax thanks Ms. Serkes for sharing her copy.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; agitprop; antiamericanism; axissally; axiswally; brownshirt; bushhasser; bushhaters; ccrm; liberalmedia; lordhawhaw; lyingliar; mediabias; memorialday; memorialday2004; mikewallace; presstitutes; propaganda; ratherbiaed; saddamite; sedition; socialist; treason; usefulidiot; wwiimemorial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: kattracks
at least 50 attendees got up and stormed out because of Wallace and Neuharth's partisan antics.

They should have stormed the podium and strangled the pukes.

41 posted on 06/01/2004 8:14:40 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,Election '04...It's going to be a bumpy ride,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington

Interesting enough that Mike Wallace brought up George Washington. I was thinking someone should create a show like the "West Wing" set during the Revolutionary War but based on current events like a blowhard from Boston in the Continental Congress critizing the Commander in Cheif and the war in general, former military leaders complaining about stalemate and lack of leadership and demanding resignations, etc.

Only thing is that all that really happened to George Washington that is happening to George Bush. I read a newspaper article that was the most hateful and partison but it wasn't Moveon.org or New York Times about Bush but a paper about Washington.

If Mike Wallace and others studied history they would see that there was people who acted just like the left in 1776 and during the civil war and right before Pearl Harbor and those reporters, politicans, etc have been proven wrong and ignored as refuse in the dustbin of history.


42 posted on 06/01/2004 8:22:41 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

See my tagline


43 posted on 06/01/2004 8:32:32 PM PDT by rllngrk33 (The fourth estate in this country has become a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
I was there. I went to the ceremony and it gave me hope. Young swapped stories with the old. Kids gave their seats up to the greatest generation. It was a perfect day.

These two hateful, ungrateful, POS's would have ruined it were it not for a handful of brave vets. Good thing I did not have tickets close enough to the main stage as to see these belligerant idiots.

44 posted on 06/01/2004 8:33:28 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
I have not watched mike Wallace or CBS sense mike Wallace said he made up crap for 60 minute so it would come out the way he wanted it to.I have not cared to and you know what i am a better person for it.I watch very little TV and i do not miss it at all.VIVA EL SOLO GRINGO.
45 posted on 06/01/2004 8:45:16 PM PDT by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Although the event was televised by C-Span, the network declined to archive the video on its web site.

Isn't that odd, a historical event, and a very popular current event like that, not archived?

Oh wait, no its not. Its the non-liberal media.

46 posted on 06/01/2004 8:48:26 PM PDT by eyespysomething (The Barbarians are at the Gates. Don't give Kerry the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Mike Wallace and that whole crew are limp and are a waste of space.


47 posted on 06/01/2004 8:49:18 PM PDT by MountainPatriot (Let slip the dogs of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Just like the rest of the naive leftist fools who can't seem to be able to divorce themselves from their political agenda for 15 minutes to provide decorum for a solemn non-political occasion, like those a*holes who were sroundly booed from commencement ceremonies across the nation this past weekend. As Rush said, they are seeing their own fall from power coming and they are going absolutely NUTS! The best we can do is help them along the way to the graveyard of their failed ideas.


48 posted on 06/01/2004 9:00:29 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
The stupidity and ignorance of Neuwarth's comment about non military people not having the stufff to lead us in war boggles the mind. Presdident George Washington never lead the nation in war.Neither did President Andrew Jackson, Zachary Taylor,or Ulysses Grant. Pres. William McKinley, a former Civil War General did, and Dwight Eisenhower ended a war and GHWB led a brief, but successful, conflict. Though I doubt his days as a TBM pilot contributed greatly to that success.

Only Korea was started and led by a Pres. with actual military experience, Harry Truman. Lincoln served two months in the Illinois militia. Wilson wouldn't have known an artillery battery from a car battery, and FDR served as Ass't SecNav, and saw the Navy as his personal yacht collection.

The idea that such ignorance can be displayed by two leading media elites should anger all Americans of any political viewpoint.When the shapers of opinion display utter ignorance of the topics in history they were chosen to comment on it's time to clean house and open the jobs up to the viewers of the History Channel. UGH!

49 posted on 06/01/2004 9:01:43 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; devolve; MeekOneGOP
(((PING))) ...Mike who???
50 posted on 06/01/2004 9:04:37 PM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

It must have been some Dem talking points sent out before the Memorial Day speeches. The guy at ours, I don't even know who it was, started ok, then went into Sunshine Patriots who lead our men to war for no reason, when they weren't even willing to fight in Vietnam, and how they ran Max Cleland out of office, a true patriot (this is in GA)blah blah blah

It was like someone punched me in the stomach. I was literally pacing a path in the grass. My husband, when he got back from walking the boys around, and hadn't heard the speech, had to keep telling me Shhh.

He was right, so I stopped, beause it was neither the time nor the place, and I readjusted my attitude, and looked at the WWII veterans in their seating area, and all the other Veterans standing around them, and thought about the men and women fighting and dying right now, and remembered why I, my 3 boys, and my husband were there.

But I will find his name out, and he will know how I feel about what he did.


51 posted on 06/01/2004 9:07:57 PM PDT by eyespysomething (The Barbarians are at the Gates. Don't give Kerry the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Mike Wallace is a pathetic, arrogant, lib journalist who got away with making a racist comment on camera once. He and Andy Rooney are way overdue for retirement.


52 posted on 06/01/2004 9:12:01 PM PDT by stratman1969 (I'm not Fonda Hanoi John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve; PhilDragoo; Ragtime Cowgirl; Cindy; SusanTK; AdmSmith; seamole; Valin; Luis Gonzalez; ...
ONE ARROGANT CBS A$$&$#*

THAT NOBODY LISTENS TO
53 posted on 06/01/2004 9:15:30 PM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

No surprise here...


54 posted on 06/01/2004 9:17:06 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

Went 'feeble' on us, huh??


55 posted on 06/01/2004 9:25:29 PM PDT by potlatch (HECK IS WHERE PEOPLE GO WHO DON'T BELIEVE IN GOSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

Mike Wallace, the Walter Conkrite of 2004.


56 posted on 06/01/2004 9:26:34 PM PDT by SAMWolf (Now entering Iraq. Please set your clocks back 10 centuries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
But I'm not sure whether a non-military commander-in-chief, no matter which party he's from and no matter who he or she is, has the background or the instincts to take us to war."

So what branch of the service did FDR serve in?

57 posted on 06/01/2004 9:29:54 PM PDT by Texasforever (When Kerry was asked what kind of tree he would like to be he answered…. Al Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Reminder bump to call SeeBS tomorrow to trash their a$$.

I'll post my comments once given.

58 posted on 06/01/2004 10:00:40 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Have a nice day or else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"...But I'm not sure whether a non-military commander-in-chief, no matter which party he's from and no matter who he or she is, has the background or the instincts to take us to war."

You friggin' jackass! Why didn't you say this about Clinton? And what branch of the military did FDR serve in.

And people wonder why the media is hated nearly as much as lawyers in America....

59 posted on 06/01/2004 10:11:36 PM PDT by freebilly (Vote Kerry-- 1 Billion Muslims Can't Be Wrong....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

Weelllll.. now, I suppose with that line of thinking from these two buffoons; that eliminates Hillary! She had even less experience than Pres. Bush! In fact, she has even less than her husband, who at least was Commander-in-chief!(much as it pains me to say!)

I can't figure out how many of them can preach about someone not having military experience leading the nation; then you realize a lot of them were anti-war, and trashed the CIC's of that time for going into Vietnam! It's a strange paradox! Both presidents who first presided over the Vietnam conflict were ex-military men, and DEMOCRATS!


60 posted on 06/01/2004 10:14:32 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson