Posted on 05/20/2004 11:28:47 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
As we were discussing earlier...
I have to wonder if anything will come of it. After all, after Syrians blew themselves up transporting bio weapons in N. Korea, all the State Department convinced the President to do was hit Syria with meaningless sanctions, such as, forbidding Syrian passenger jets to land in the USofA, when Syria doesn't have passenger jets landing in the USofA.
I remember this being reported a year ago. What is the difference in the report this time?
We're fighting in Iraq with Clinton's much reduced armed forces, and fighting at home with fifth columnists in the media, the schools and the elite of the Democrat party.
One thing I trust Bush about implicitly is that he will act after he carefully moves our ducks into a row. He's a poker player, and some times you have to wait through a whole evening of bad cards and bluffing before you can wipe everyone out with a good hand.
Would one or all of you post a link to this,to you know who? Please?
"But over the last few months, U.S. intelligence managed to track the Iraqi WMD convoy to Lebanon's Bekaa Valley.
Through the use of satellites, electronic monitoring and human intelligence, the intelligence community has determined that much, if not all, of Iraq's biological and chemical weapons assets are being protected by Syria, with Iranian help, in the Bekaa Valley."
...wonder how the media's gonna handle this one. lol
Like they do everything else contrary to their 'version' of the news.
Put more nudie pictures of prisoners on TV.
Same way they handled this report over a year ago...they ignored it.
If it's mentioned, they'll say it proves the Dems were right to question the attack on Iraq as it just caused the WMD to be scattered to the winds and closer to control by terrorists.
Personally I think Sadaam was complicit in 9/11, and no amount of claim there is no "proof" will change my gut on that one.
/sarcasm
I wish it really was funny...
Me too. Seems like sometimes the closest one can come to being lighthearted - rather than totally bummed - about these things, is to be sarcastic.
Sad, huh.
You're absolutely right about fighting the war in Iraq with the military and the propaganda war at home in US.
We're doing pretty well militarily ... but not so well with the propaganda war at home. Ticks me off.
This is just a rehash of old info that came out, as you state in your response, several months ago. Nothing new here ...
So if we go to Bekaa and find the weapons the RATS will say, "see there were no weapons in Iraq and we should have attacked Lebanon."
This election cycle needs to conclude now. Once Bush is reelected he can then focus on Syria.
We are in for an interesting four years.
"One thing I trust Bush about implicitly is that he will act after he carefully moves our ducks into a row. He's a poker player, and some times you have to wait through a whole evening of bad cards and bluffing before you can wipe everyone out with a good hand."
I sure hope you're right. However, I'm too old and have been around too long to fully trust any politician. Some are more trustworthy than others (for instance, I had trust in Ronald Reagan to a significant degree, but had absolutely none in Bill Clinton or LBJ; I trust GWM more than I trusted his Father; I had no trust in Carter, and next to none in Nixon; but I did trust Ford; I was iffy with Kennedy, but I did trust Eisenhower quite a bit, whom, to me, was not a politician, and thus was deserving of some trust). I wasn't old enough to remember Truman.
Indeed, JH!!
But then we acknowledge that the President Bush we know - contrary to the libral media and the Teddys and Nancys and Kerrys of Congress - is not now and never has been a prevaricator.
The steady feed of intelligence pooh-poohed by the Power Seekers is right on, and verfied by the Israeli bloodhounds as well.
It is a somewhat amusing thing that they increase the volume and intensity of their screeching cries, setting themselves up nicely for - - The Big Fall !!!
lol
Yes - stay tuned to your tellys in October, probably, for the (pardon my using French) coup de grace..:))
The Far Side amusingly plays into 'misunderestimation,' besmirching him as a dolt and buffoon....
as always, "he who laughs last, laughs best;" as we will with him...
Thanks for the ping Marine.
Has the president met your approval...ever?
are we the only ones that know this??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.