Skip to comments.
Kerry spoke of meeting negotiators on Vietnam - Claimed US Was "Murdering" Vietnamese
Boston Globe ^
| 3/25/04
| Michael Kranish and Patrick Healy
Posted on 03/25/2004 2:29:29 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON -- In a question-and-answer session before a Senate committee in 1971, John F. Kerry, who was a leading antiwar activist at the time, asserted that 200,000 Vietnamese per year were being "murdered by the United States of America" and said he had gone to the Paris and "talked with both delegations at the peace talks" and met with communist representatives.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1971; 2004; 2004election; 2004electionbias; agitprop; aidandcomfort; antiamerican; election2004; genocide; hanoijohn; johnfondakerry; johnftakerry; kerry; lyingliar; paris; propaganda; spin; timeofwar; traitor; treason; unamerican; unfitforoffice; vietgate; vietnam; vietnamhero; vietnamveterans; vietnamvets; vvaw; warcrimes; warcriminal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
1
posted on
03/25/2004 2:29:30 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: Hon
Ping to more info on Kerry's meetings witht he Vietcong in Paris.
2
posted on
03/25/2004 2:34:43 AM PST
by
An.American.Expatriate
(A vote for JF'nK is a vote for Peace in our Time!)
To: kattracks; Mo1; nopardons; Miss Marple; Howlin
This man is more dangerous, to this country, than Bill and Hillary Clinton!!!
3
posted on
03/25/2004 2:46:32 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: An.American.Expatriate
Kerry maintains he was a reservist for years after his discharge from active duty.
If so, then meeting with and comforting the enemy is a treasonous action.
4
posted on
03/25/2004 3:08:47 AM PST
by
opbuzz
To: kattracks; All
5
posted on
03/25/2004 3:15:47 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: kattracks
and.... JFKerry is coming to Kansas City, March 28, 2004, wonder if his fellow protester Randy Barnes will be visited once again?
To: kattracks
"Kerry responded that "... but I think that at this point the United States is not really in a position to consider the happiness of those people as pertains to the army in our withdrawal."
Come again!
7
posted on
03/25/2004 3:21:26 AM PST
by
Bahbah
To: kattracks; doug from upland; backhoe; MeekOneGOP
If any one thinks hanoi john just happened to go to Paris for his honeymoon...I've ocean front property in Arizona to sell you..reasonably.
8
posted on
03/25/2004 3:32:31 AM PST
by
GailA
(Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
To: kcvl
This man is more dangerous, to this country, than Bill and Hillary Clinton!!! Absolutely.
The 'toons are self serving and power-hungry, and would sell out their country for the right price.
Kerry was and is a full featured traitor who would sell out his country for nothing.
9
posted on
03/25/2004 3:46:13 AM PST
by
dinasour
To: GailA
But the spokesman played down the extent of Kerry's role As well he should, given that it is actually a crime....kinda like being involved in a conspiracy to assassinate US Senators.
10
posted on
03/25/2004 3:46:55 AM PST
by
blanknoone
(Give Kerry enough nuance, and he will hang himself.)
To: kattracks
BTTT
To: kattracks
It is about time that the mainstream media starts covering this story. Kerry and other members of the VVAW went to Paris to meet with the Vietnamese Communists. As has been documented on FR, we even have the picture of the meeting. Kerry's and the VVAW's activities need more scrutiny by the media. Also, according to his testimony before Congress, Kerry was dead wrong about what would happen if the US pulled out. Kerry thought a few thousand South Vietnamese were in danger, he was wrong. He also has a lot explaining to do concerning his support for a Communist takeover of the South.
12
posted on
03/25/2004 4:00:13 AM PST
by
kabar
To: kattracks
"Senator Kerry never suggested or believed and absolutely rejects the idea that the word applied to service of the American soldiers in Vietnam..." Hey, it's one thing to use the word "murder" in a casual conversation. It's another to use it in front of a Senate committee. Didn't mean it, my you-know-what.
13
posted on
03/25/2004 4:01:48 AM PST
by
BlessedBeGod
('I went to Vietnam, yada yada yada, I want to be President..." -- Holt about Kerry)
To: opbuzz
Kerry maintains he was a reservist for years after his discharge from active duty.
If so, then meeting with and comforting the enemy is a treasonous action.And there is no statue on limitations on treason.
To: GailA
If any one thinks hanoi john just happened to go to Paris for his honeymoon...I've ocean front property in Arizona to sell you..reasonably. How much??
To: opbuzz
Kerry, indeed, was presumably a reservist after his active duty. The oath of an officer of the U. S. Armed Forces states: "I...solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same..." This, moreover, has direct application to Kerry's not reporting the manifestly serious discussion by VVAW of assasinating members of the U. S. government. He refused to carry out his oath as an officer, and cannot not in anyway be relied on to carry out the similar oath as President.
16
posted on
03/25/2004 4:34:19 AM PST
by
mtntop3
("Those who must know before they believe will never come to full knowledge.")
To: kattracks
Would-be assassin buddies, Logan Act violations, medal tossing, atrocities...
He's a rebel and he'll never be any good.
To: An.American.Expatriate
Hanoi Jane and John are both guilty of treason. Abetting and comforting the enemy is treason, regardless of the circumstances. To accuse American soldiers of murder is treasonous. To imagine war without innocent noncombatants killed is ridiculous. This is the reason war has to be considered seriously. A soldier in the service of his country is duty bound to inflict as much damage as possible against the enemy. If Kerry opposed the war on principle, he should have filed as a conscientious objector. Case closed.
18
posted on
03/25/2004 4:49:31 AM PST
by
meenie
To: kattracks
I never negociated with the Viet Cong... until I actually did.
To: kattracks
Thanks for posting this article on Hanoi John!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson