1 posted on
03/25/2004 2:29:30 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Hon
Ping to more info on Kerry's meetings witht he Vietcong in Paris.
2 posted on
03/25/2004 2:34:43 AM PST by
An.American.Expatriate
(A vote for JF'nK is a vote for Peace in our Time!)
To: kattracks; Mo1; nopardons; Miss Marple; Howlin
This man is more dangerous, to this country, than Bill and Hillary Clinton!!!
3 posted on
03/25/2004 2:46:32 AM PST by
kcvl
To: kattracks; All
5 posted on
03/25/2004 3:15:47 AM PST by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: kattracks
and.... JFKerry is coming to Kansas City, March 28, 2004, wonder if his fellow protester Randy Barnes will be visited once again?
To: kattracks
"Kerry responded that "... but I think that at this point the United States is not really in a position to consider the happiness of those people as pertains to the army in our withdrawal."
Come again!
7 posted on
03/25/2004 3:21:26 AM PST by
Bahbah
To: kattracks; doug from upland; backhoe; MeekOneGOP
If any one thinks hanoi john just happened to go to Paris for his honeymoon...I've ocean front property in Arizona to sell you..reasonably.
8 posted on
03/25/2004 3:32:31 AM PST by
GailA
(Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
To: kattracks
BTTT
To: kattracks
It is about time that the mainstream media starts covering this story. Kerry and other members of the VVAW went to Paris to meet with the Vietnamese Communists. As has been documented on FR, we even have the picture of the meeting. Kerry's and the VVAW's activities need more scrutiny by the media. Also, according to his testimony before Congress, Kerry was dead wrong about what would happen if the US pulled out. Kerry thought a few thousand South Vietnamese were in danger, he was wrong. He also has a lot explaining to do concerning his support for a Communist takeover of the South.
12 posted on
03/25/2004 4:00:13 AM PST by
kabar
To: kattracks
"Senator Kerry never suggested or believed and absolutely rejects the idea that the word applied to service of the American soldiers in Vietnam..." Hey, it's one thing to use the word "murder" in a casual conversation. It's another to use it in front of a Senate committee. Didn't mean it, my you-know-what.
13 posted on
03/25/2004 4:01:48 AM PST by
BlessedBeGod
('I went to Vietnam, yada yada yada, I want to be President..." -- Holt about Kerry)
To: kattracks
Would-be assassin buddies, Logan Act violations, medal tossing, atrocities...
He's a rebel and he'll never be any good.
To: kattracks
I never negociated with the Viet Cong... until I actually did.
To: kattracks
Thanks for posting this article on Hanoi John!
To: kattracks
21 posted on
03/25/2004 5:05:19 AM PST by
BunnySlippers
(Help Bring Colly-fornia Back ...)
To: kattracks
Interesting the Boston Globe doing this article. Perhaps they wanted to dump this story while GW is getting hit by the media for 911.
22 posted on
03/25/2004 5:06:26 AM PST by
mware
To: kattracks
" In a question-and-answer session before a Senate committee in 1971, John F. Kerry, who was a leading antiwar activist at the time, asserted that 200,000 Vietnamese per year were being "murdered by the United States of America" and said he had gone to the Paris and "talked with both delegations at the peace talks" and met with communist representatives I find it hard to believe this man is a Presidential candidate. Even harder to believe is the neglect of the above issue by the mainstream press. Incredible!
To: OXENinFLA
yesterday confirmed through a spokesman that he did go to Paris and talked privately with a leading communist representative. But the spokesman played down the extent of Kerry's role and said Kerry did not engage in negotiations. He we go with more trying to have both ways, hero and traitor.
34 posted on
03/25/2004 6:21:17 AM PST by
StriperSniper
(Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
To: kattracks
sounds like Flipper should bring all Viet Nam vets to trial for murder
35 posted on
03/25/2004 6:22:49 AM PST by
InvisibleChurch
("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.")
To: kattracks
Kerry's statement dealt with the question of whether he was trying to negotiate in Paris as a private citizen and was thus on that "borderline" of what was allowable. A US law forbids citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on matters such as peace treaties. Meehan said Kerry was not negotiating. Didn't Kerry bring back a document he co-signed that was like a peace treaty or something? Hazy memory here.
To: kattracks
Kerry, now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, yesterday confirmed through a spokesman that he did go to Paris and talked privately with a leading communist representative. But the spokesman played down the extent of Kerry's role and said Kerry did not engage in negotiations.
He just happened to be there talking to the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong representatives to the Paris Peace talks while the VVAW was negotiating a published and well-documented separate peace? What a coincidence!
To: kattracks
Kerry's speech before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971 is one of the best-known moments of his life Let's keep it that way. This man has no business in public life today, other than being behind bars for treason against his country.
38 posted on
03/25/2004 6:34:23 AM PST by
twigs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson