Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/30/2026 6:46:45 AM PDT by eastexsteve
A new Texas law allows companies with SAE Level 4 or higher autonomous vehicles to offer commercial driverless transportation.
Tesla wasted no time in self-certifying their vehicles. On the same day the law went into effect, Tesla officially self-certified their FSD software on their robotaxi vehicles as Level 4 compliant.
For years, Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD software, even in Texas, has navigated the consumer market under the constraints imposed by a Level 2 driver-assist system. And while Tesla now operates in Texas as a level-4 system, this does not change the level-2 designation for consumer vehicles. Taking Responsibility
While many of Tesla’s robotaxi rides in Austin were already driverless, there’s an important distinction in level 4 autonomy.
By certifying its software as Level 4 for commercial operations, Tesla is willfully absorbing a substantial portion of the operational liability. It’s legally stating that its vehicles can operate themselves without any human supervision or intervention under certain conditions.
These conditions are typically based on weather, region (geofense), or speed.
This willingness to take on legal accountability is a major turning point for Tesla, as it is the first time the company has been certified as a level 4 system.
SAE International defines a Level-4 autonomous vehicle as:
Entire dynamic driving task (DDT): The system does all steering, braking, accelerating, lane changes, signaling, and monitoring of the driving environment.
Dynamic driving task fallback: If something goes wrong (sensor failure, road closure, etc.), the system itself must handle the situation and achieve a safe outcome. It cannot depend on a human taking over.
Operational Design Domain (ODD): The specific conditions under which the system is designed to operate (certain roads, cities, weather conditions, speeds, etc.).
Consumer Vehicles Still Level 2
This new ruling for Tesla only covers its Robotaxi vehicles. Regular consumer cars, although they use a similar FSD version, are still considered Level 2 by law, and drivers will be fully held responsible.
Vehicles in Austin have advantages over consumer vehicles, even when they run the same FSD software. In addition to being geofenced, these areas have also received additional FSD training, which has improved FSD performance.
Tesla also offers remote assistance to help these vehicles when they encounter situations where their confidence threshold is low.
Ultimately, this is another milestone for Tesla and its Robotaxi network, but it won’t affect consumer vehicles, at least not yet.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
at least a computer driven car will hit the brakes before it hits something. unlike an illegal truck driver.
Yes, it seems the potential to avoid actual human interaction and emotional connection with in person kindnesses are indeed becoming endless.
Welcome to the world of Wall-E.
Happy that you like your Tesla, though.
This challenge could be mitigated considerably with a wireless beacon, reflector, Maps alert, or other indicator being an element of closure signage. Of course, that puts responsibility on government actors to effect said notification, and they don't want the liability.
If we had stopped the far-left trannies from destroying Tesla, we wouldn’t be worrying about the price of oil right now.
The potentials for utility become endless.
Consider what this means for blind people, for all people who cannot drive for one reason or another. For people who need to spend their time more productively than driving.
It will be like having a 24/7 chauffeur who never gets tired, never gossips, never has family problems, and only costs a hundred dollars a month.
It will make cross country driving competitive with airline tickets. 24 hours to travel 1500 miles, arriving fresh, with all your gear and with a vehicle. Take off anytime, arrive with a full nights sleep and a full day’s work done online.
People had a hard time with Tesla getting massive federal and state subsidies, tax breaks, government mandates on how many EVs must be built, CO2 offsets, or laws that only allow EVs to operate in certain areas...
It’s not the governments role to “shape the market,” and have a hand on the consumers head guiding them through the decision of what vehicle they should buy.
On a personal note: if I were in Musk’s shoes, I too would act in the best interests of Tesla and maximize what I can hammer out of government for my business, capitalizing on much of the green and environmental nonsense.
Ask most “Musk haters” what they think about Space-X, and you’ll hear a love story.
Level 4 should also require a module that listens to every suggestion given it by any and all women riding in the car, even if more than one.
My wife and her mother-in-law would insist on this module.
You can see it coming: Driverless delivery trucks, with one of Elon’s robots in the back which can pick up a box and walk it to your door. All of those deliveries moving from warehouse to your door, with no human involved. Not happening quite yet, but you can see it coming.
Don’t own any EV, don’t plan to. Not real sure about this move for Tesla, altho I have no personal qualms about them as a company. I am not sure about driverless conditions for a commercial vehicle, tho, personally don’t think it is a great idea for a few reaons.
To me, the most serious deficit raised by driverless vehicles is that the driver loses proficiency by lack of practice.
I would 100times rather have a computer with instant reaction times and that can look every direction at once driving all the cars around me instead of people who cant even drive a shopping cart at Walmart.
It wasn't that long ago they all loved Elon, and thought Teslas were the greatest thing since sliced bread. But, then he aligned himself with Trump, and that all changed.
This isn't about Tesla.
It's about the trolley problem.
From 2017 and still an issue...
I’d be curious to see what happens the first time Tesla faces a personal injury lawsuit over this technology.
The benefits for the elderly—who should not be driving but want the benefits of driving—are immense.
Meanwhile I drive my old clunker.
When the self driving cars are available in my area then my clunker goes into the trash heap.
For the left.
But for those on the right that criticize it’s ALWAYS been about government meddling in what should be a “free market.”
Look, if it’s a free market, and Tesla grows to be the largest auto giant in the world, more power to them.
I don't think it would be that hard. The car constantly sends me notices about many things. If my wife is using the car, I can see an interactive map of where she is, and where she is going. Even with her "driving" I can control the car with my phone. Like any other piece of equipment in the road, I'm still responsible for dealing with it impeding traffic, etc. As far as a flat or mechanical breakdown, it can send me a message, or just summon a tow truck on its own.
That is a lot of Muslims who will not have work, because this technology will be adopted quickly all across North America if it works as well as they hope.
Do the robotaxis self dock to refuel?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.