Posted on 02/04/2026 6:06:31 AM PST by MtnClimber
A set of internal documents published by the Republican members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee (Judiciary GOP) has sent shockwaves through Brussels.
Released under the title The EU Censorship Files, Part II, the investigation presents documentary evidence of a sustained strategy by the European Commission to influence public debate on social media and digital platforms, pressuring major tech companies to censor lawful content, alter their internal rules, and restrict certain political viewpoints.
https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/2018683758006665352
The revelations go far beyond an abstract debate over content moderation. According to the material made public, the Commission has directly or indirectly intervened in at least eight electoral processes across six European countries since 2023, using high-level meetings with digital platforms in the days and weeks leading up to elections to demand stricter censorship of political speech.
A decade-long censorship architecture
The leaked files show that this policy did not originate with the Digital Services Act (DSA), but dates back at least to 2015. As stated in the Committee’s official thread on X, “it began as early as 2015, when the European Commission created ‘codes’ and ‘forums’ through which it could pressure platforms to censor speech more aggressively.” These mechanisms, publicly presented as voluntary and consensus-based, functioned in practice as tools of regulatory coercion.
Internal communications from the tech companies themselves, included in the dossier, are particularly revealing. They acknowledge that “the Commission sets the agenda, forces consensus, and platforms don’t really have a choice.” The primary goal was not the removal of individual pieces of content, but rather the reshaping of community guidelines—the global rules that define which ideas are allowed to circulate in the digital public square.
From the pandemic to electoral control
During the COVID-19 crisis, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and then–Vice President Vera Jourová actively pressured platforms to remove content that challenged official narratives about the pandemic and vaccines. The report summarizes it bluntly: “They told platforms to change their rules and take down content questioning established narratives about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine.”
From 2022 onward, this strategy became institutionalized. Between 2022 and 2024, the Commission organized more than 90 meetings under the Disinformation Code, urging platforms to tighten their moderation rules on a global scale. With the entry into force of the Digital Services Act (DSA), the pressure intensified further, with companies warned that they would have to submit their rules to a “continuous review of community guidelines” in order to avoid sanctions.
The impact was immediate. In 2024, TikTok changed its global rules “to comply with the Digital Services Act,” a move that, according to the documents, resulted in the censorship of truthful information and broad, vague categories of protected speech, even outside Europe. “That’s right: because of Europe’s censorship law, TikTok censors true information in the United States,” the Committee stresses.
Interference in European elections
The most sensitive aspect of the report is the direct link between these practices and specific electoral processes. Since 2023, the Commission held meetings with digital platforms ahead of national elections in Ireland in both 2024 and 2025; in France in 2024; in the Netherlands in 2023 and again in 2025; in Slovakia in 2023; in Moldova in 2024; and in Romania that same year. In every case, the meetings took place at critical moments of the campaign and were aimed at intensifying the censorship of political content deemed problematic.
Internal platform documents show that following these meetings, TikTok censored widely used conservative political claims, such as the (true) assertion that there are only two sexes. The DSA Election Guidelines themselves state that platforms must “adapt their terms and conditions” ahead of elections to combat so-called disinformation. Although officially presented as voluntary recommendations, a senior DSA official admitted in private conversations that they were, in practice, mandatory.
The Romanian case is particularly controversial. A court annulled the 2024 presidential election, citing alleged Russian interference via TikTok. However, the platform itself informed the Commission that it had found “no evidence of a coordinated Russian campaign” to support the winning candidate, Calin Georgescu. Subsequent investigations revealed that another Romanian political party had in fact funded the campaign attributed to Russia.
The Judiciary GOP revelations force a reassessment of the balance between regulation and freedom within the European Union. Beyond the official rhetoric about combating disinformation, the documents describe an architecture of narrative control that strikes at the heart of democratic pluralism and citizens’ right to debate freely without ideological oversight.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
It happens in the USA too. It is always the left that plays these games.
‘May have?”
Do they ever have that wrong, absolute have and in many more than 8.
The venture into Venezula was actually to obtain the actual evidence of the fraud that allowed Biden to win the 2020 election
The recent FBI evidence gathering at the Fulton county warehouse is fruit of the Venezuelan venture.
It is almost a certainty that the evidence will be shared with other nations in which similar election fraud was perpetrated.
This article is evidence of that evidence
I agree re: Venezuela: It’s about the crooked voting machines. They were originally developed by Hugo Chavez to rig his own elections and took off from there.
A most excellent post! You connected the dots.
BUMP!
Of course, some of our elections aren’t fair either. 2020 comes to mind.
So now those elections are invalidated, like they did in Romania when Russia helped amplify the winning candidate’s campaign messaging?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.