Posted on 12/08/2025 2:17:06 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Alina Habba, the former personal attorney to President Trump, is stepping down from her contested position atop the federal prosecuting office in New Jersey.
“As a result of the Third Circuit’s ruling, and to protect the stability and integrity of the office which I love, I have decided to step down in my role,” she said in a statement posted on X on Monday.
Habba’s resignation came after district and appellate court rulings which found she was unlawfully serving in the role, a powerful post charged with enforcing federal criminal and civil law.
The Trump administration had been attempting to keep Habba in place after her interim appointment expired and she had not received US Senate confirmation.
Habba’s statement Monday said “do not mistake compliance for surrender”.
“Make no mistake, you can take the girl out of New Jersey, but you cannot take New Jersey out of the girl,” Habba’s statement said.
Attorney General Pam Bondi said that Habba would remain at the Department of Justice as senior advisor to the attorney general for U.S. Attorneys.
“I am saddened to accept Alina’s resignation,” Bondi said, calling the appellate court’s decision “flawed”.
(Excerpt) Read more at infowars.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Yeah, if we could only win the senate we wouldn’t ... wait
Put her in charge of something where she can make judges lives hell.
Thune could just get rid of the “blue slip” nonsense, so Trump could have the prosecutors he desires.
Rats win again…..sick of this 💩
Most legislation takes 60 votes in the Senate.
Would it kill the Senate to just CONFIRM Trump’s nominees? It’s almost been a year, dickweeds.
Is it the sole authority of the District Attorney to bring charges in the circuit?
If a circuit has no DA, can’t Bondi, on the advice of a duly assigned Advisor, bring charges in a certain circuit?
Sack Smith was an illegally appointed Special Prosecutor, but he never stepped down. His role violated the Appointments Clause (U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2), which requires principal officers to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, while inferior officers can be appointed by department heads if Congress authorizes it by law.
Smith, a private citizen at the time, was appointed directly by Garland without presidential nomination or Senate approval. Critics like former Attorney General Edwin Meese III, law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson, and Texas AG Ken Paxton contend this made Smith a “principal officer” with unchecked power (e.g., nationwide prosecutorial authority exceeding that of Senate-confirmed U.S. attorneys). They argue no statute explicitly vests the attorney general with power to create a “special counsel” role with such authority, rendering actions like indictments “null and void.”
NJ does not a a US Attorney
Criminals are happy
She didn’t “step down”. The far left fag dudes in the man buns and the left’s skank Dipstick court feminine “jugheads” went after her. Those fag boyz are some real bass turds when it comes to beating women. Same with the lesbo skanky Dipstick Court jugheads.
AI Overview Many Republican senators have expressed strong support for retaining the "blue slip" tradition for district court and U.S. attorney nominees, largely as a mechanism to preserve home-state influence and prevent future Democratic administrations from appointing liberal judges in conservative states. Senators who have publicly supported keeping the blue slip process include: Chuck Grassley (R-IA): As a former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Grassley has been a staunch defender of the practice, arguing that it helps set nominees up for successful confirmations and was used by Republicans to block liberal judges during the Biden administration. John Thune (R-SD): The current Senate Majority Leader has consistently defended the practice, noting both sides have used it historically and that there is little interest in changing it within the GOP conference. Thom Tillis (R-NC): A member of the Judiciary Committee, Tillis called the idea of eliminating blue slips a "terrible, short-sighted ploy" that would ultimately benefit Democrats in the long term. Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Jim Risch (R-ID): Both Idaho senators have long supported the process, using it to ensure consultation and influence over judicial appointments within their home state during Democratic administrations. John Kennedy (R-LA): A Judiciary Committee member, Kennedy has stated that "The Senate's not going to give up the blue slip" and appealed to others not to create a fight over the issue. In general, most Senate Republicans are unified in their opposition to ending the blue slip for district-level nominees, seeing it as an important institutional power that protects their ability to have a say in local federal appointments, regardless of who occupies the White House.
Hubba, Hubba.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.