Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2025 2:17:06 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah, if we could only win the senate we wouldn’t ... wait


2 posted on 12/08/2025 2:21:01 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Put her in charge of something where she can make judges lives hell.


3 posted on 12/08/2025 2:26:29 PM PST by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thune could just get rid of the “blue slip” nonsense, so Trump could have the prosecutors he desires.


4 posted on 12/08/2025 2:28:11 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Rats win again…..sick of this 💩


5 posted on 12/08/2025 2:29:38 PM PST by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Would it kill the Senate to just CONFIRM Trump’s nominees? It’s almost been a year, dickweeds.


7 posted on 12/08/2025 2:33:10 PM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Publius

Is it the sole authority of the District Attorney to bring charges in the circuit?

If a circuit has no DA, can’t Bondi, on the advice of a duly assigned Advisor, bring charges in a certain circuit?


8 posted on 12/08/2025 2:38:46 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (The Democrats' official policy is now, “Hate, Violence and Murder". Change my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sack Smith was an illegally appointed Special Prosecutor, but he never stepped down. His role violated the Appointments Clause (U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2), which requires principal officers to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, while inferior officers can be appointed by department heads if Congress authorizes it by law.

Smith, a private citizen at the time, was appointed directly by Garland without presidential nomination or Senate approval. Critics like former Attorney General Edwin Meese III, law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson, and Texas AG Ken Paxton contend this made Smith a “principal officer” with unchecked power (e.g., nationwide prosecutorial authority exceeding that of Senate-confirmed U.S. attorneys). They argue no statute explicitly vests the attorney general with power to create a “special counsel” role with such authority, rendering actions like indictments “null and void.”


9 posted on 12/08/2025 3:09:40 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NJ does not a a US Attorney
Criminals are happy


10 posted on 12/08/2025 3:31:47 PM PST by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She didn’t “step down”. The far left fag dudes in the man buns and the left’s skank Dipstick court feminine “jugheads” went after her. Those fag boyz are some real bass turds when it comes to beating women. Same with the lesbo skanky Dipstick Court jugheads.


12 posted on 12/08/2025 4:45:32 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Freedom isn't Free. Socialism isn't free either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hubba, Hubba.....


14 posted on 12/08/2025 8:43:17 PM PST by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson