|
Posted on 09/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Basically we just need to be careful, to paraphrase a popular quote, of attributing to malice that which can be attributed to Grift.
There’s plenty of evil intentions out there, the cement that binds it though is each entities need to keep their Vig coming. 🤠
I don’t disagree with that. However that wasn’t the topic of discussion.
Update: Judge Karin Immergut issued a new order just now blocking ALL National Guard from anywhere in the country from protecting federal property in Oregon. She said there is no justification for them being there.
Around 100 California National Guard members had already landed… https://t.co/yy6vkl7IBc— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) October 6, 2025
I thought about that discussion recently! Could be he is safeguarding all that gold in the White House. Plan to dump t into the treasury when the time is right??
| Date | Judge Name | Court | Misconduct/Crime | Action/Punishment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1803 | John Pickering | D.N.H. | Mental instability, intoxication on bench | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.) | Removed from office[9] |
| 1804 | Samuel Chase | SCOTUS | Arbitrary/oppressive trial conduct | Impeached (U.S. Const.) | Acquitted by Senate[9] |
| 1830 | James H. Peck | D. Mo. | Abuse of contempt power | Impeached (U.S. Const.) | Acquitted by Senate[9] |
| 1862 | West H. Humphreys | D. Tenn. | Waging war against U.S., refusing to hold court | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.) | Removed from office[9] |
| 1873 | Mark W. Delahay | D. Kan. | Intoxication on bench | Impeached (U.S. Const.) | Resigned before Senate trial[9] |
| 1904 | Charles Swayne | N.D. Fla. | Abuse of contempt power, misuse of office | Impeached (U.S. Const.) | Acquitted by Senate[9] |
| 1912 | Robert W. Archbald | 3d Cir./Commerce Ct. | Improper business ties with litigants | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.) | Removed from office[9] |
| 1926 | George W. English | E.D. Ill. | Abuse of power | Impeached (U.S. Const.) | Resigned; proceedings dismissed[9] |
| 1933 | Harold Louderback | N.D. Cal. | Favoritism in bankruptcy appointments | Impeached (U.S. Const.) | Acquitted by Senate[9] |
| 1936 | Halsted L. Ritter | S.D. Fla. | Favoritism in bankruptcy, practicing law on bench | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.) | Removed from office[9] |
| 1939 | Martin T. Manton | 2d Cir. | Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201) | Criminal prosecution; resigned | Convicted; imprisoned 19 months[34] |
| 1973 | Otto Kerner Jr. | 7th Cir. | Bribery, tax evasion (18 U.S.C. § 201; 26 U.S.C. § 7201) | Criminal prosecution; resigned | Convicted; imprisoned 3 years[38] |
| 1986 | Harry E. Claiborne | D. Nev. | Tax evasion (26 U.S.C. § 7201) | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.); criminal prosecution | Removed; imprisoned 17 months[9] |
| 1988 | Alcee L. Hastings | S.D. Fla. | Perjury, conspiracy to solicit bribe (18 U.S.C. § 1621; § 201) | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.); criminal trial | Removed; acquitted in criminal trial[9] |
| 1989 | Walter L. Nixon | S.D. Miss. | Perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.); criminal prosecution | Removed; imprisoned 2.5 years[9] |
| 1993 | Robert F. Collins | E.D. La. | Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201) | Criminal prosecution; resigned amid impeachment | Convicted; imprisoned ~6 years[51] |
| 2009 | Samuel B. Kent | S.D. Tex. | Sexual assault, obstruction (18 U.S.C. § 1503) | Impeached (U.S. Const.); criminal prosecution | Resigned; imprisoned 33 months[9] |
| 2010 | G. Thomas Porteous Jr. | E.D. La. | Accepting bribes, false statements (18 U.S.C. § 201; § 1001) | Impeached and removed (U.S. Const.) | Removed; disqualified from future office[9] |
| 2010 | Jack Tarpley Camp Jr. | N.D. Ga. | Drug possession, aiding felony (21 U.S.C. § 844; 18 U.S.C. § 2) | Criminal prosecution; resigned | Convicted; imprisoned 15 days[38] |
| 2023 | Pauline Newman | Fed. Cir. | Refusal to undergo mental exam (disability claim) | Disciplinary action (28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364) | Suspended from cases for 1 year[23] |
| 2024 | Joshua Kindred | D. Alaska | Hostile work environment, sexual harassment | Disciplinary action (28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364) | Public reprimand; resigned[22] |
Good research!
I guess I just remember the Alcee Hastings case well because he ended up elected to Congress.
My point is impeachment by the House without conviction (2/3rds Senate majority vote!) means little these days. Your graphic more then demonstrates that.
Again where are the 2/3rds Senate votes going to come from to remove judges who stand in the way of the Trump agenda? From the Rats? NO! Rats want judges standing in the way! You’re not even going to get all the Republicans, e.g., Rand Paul!!
96.6% English to 15.3% English in 65 years.
Is there a term to describe this? 🤔 https://t.co/osWVZ6LPmM— Lauren Chen (@TheLaurenChen) October 6, 2025
Xone. Thank you for this clarification! If the President ever does call up the Maryland N.G. I have no doubt it will end up in court. (Moore will probalby engage in Fabian tactics of delay.)
Heartbroken father who almost lost his 12 year old daughter to suicide exposes school district held a secret s*x club and told kids not to tell their parents.
He should sue them into oblivion.
pic.twitter.com/JvGPDcHgYq— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) October 6, 2025
So this pissant judge rules the entire nation now in her opinion? I hope Trump ignores her before an ICE agent is killed by those paid demons
here’s the latest episode of the And We Know report:
10.6.25: [MARKERS] matter, The ENEMY playbook FAILED, Navy Celebration comms for all, Get READY! Pray!
CDC Parasites (Still a good Good resource! save the link!)
(I did not find Islam listed here. Racoon scat and roundworms are a real problem. Not a good pet.) Some very bad parasites! Thank God for Ivermectin!
(Governments can provide Social Services or Unlimited immigration, but not both. Milton Friedman)
Keir Starmer at night feeding his pets?
I know, Racist dog whistle, but its about the Dumb mostly white liberal Brit rulers. (Where is Larry the Cat when you need him?)
Dear Lord 🙏 pic.twitter.com/J9c7phmYTT— Jack Straw (@JackStr42679640) October 5, 2025
The first time “Palestine” was applied to the region was following the Bar Kokhba revolt in A.D 132–135, when the Romans renamed the province of Judea “Syria-Palestine.”
During the later period of Ottoman rule, the geographic area of Palestine was administered as part of larger provinces, most notably the Province of Beirut, and directly as the Sanjaq of Jerusalem.
Following administrative reorganizations in the 1870s and 1880s, the area was divided into three main administrative units: the direct Sanjaq of Jerusalem, the Sanjaq of Acre (part of Beirut), and the Sanjaq of Nablus (also part of Beirut).
It appears that at no time in Ottoman history was “Palestine” used for the region. There were various Crusader Kingdoms in the late Middle Ages, but the general term Christians used for the Levant at that time was “Outremer.”
After WWI, the victorious allies carved up the Ottoman Empire. The League of Nations mandated control of the former empire to France and Britain. Britain was given what they called “Mandatory Palestine,” today’s Israel, Jordan, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.
Early in the Mandate’s history (1921), it was partitioned: the region east of the Jordan River became the Kingdom of Transjordan, and west of the river remained Mandatory Palestine.
I think the use of “Palestine” by the British was part “historic” in that it was used in late Roman times and part “neutral” in that it was a name no one had used for quite some time.
I doubt they were trying to form a new nationality through its use. Arafat had other ideas.
CIRCLE BACK TO MUST WATCH
thx g_w
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
