Posted on 07/15/2025 8:41:09 AM PDT by Red Badger
Lab Study Raises Concerns That Sugar Substitute Erythritol May Raise Risk Of Stroke
In a Nutshell
Erythritol, found in many sugar-free drinks, was tested on human brain blood vessel cells in the lab. The sweetener increased cellular stress and disrupted key protective pathways.
These changes are known risk factors for stroke — but the study was short-term and done in cells only.
Researchers say more human research is needed to understand real-world health effects.
==============================================================================
BOULDER, Colo. — That zero-calorie sweetener making your morning coffee taste just right might be quietly interfering with the tiny blood vessels in your brain — at least in a petri dish. A new laboratory study has found that erythritol, one of the most widely used artificial sweeteners, adversely affects the function of human brain blood vessel cells at levels similar to drinking just one can of diet soda.
Researchers from the University of Colorado-Boulder discovered that erythritol triggers a cascade of cellular changes that could theoretically raise stroke risk: ramping up harmful oxidative stress inside cells, disrupting protective nitric oxide pathways, and blunting the brain’s natural clot-busting abilities.
The team used concentrations of erythritol that match what someone would have in their bloodstream after consuming about 30 grams of the sweetener, which is roughly the amount in a standard artificially sweetened drink. It’s the same kind millions of people reach for daily, believing they’re making a healthier choice because it says “diet” or “sugar-free.”
Erythritol’s popularity has surged over the past decade as consumers and food companies search for sugar alternatives that don’t spike blood sugar levels. Found in everything from sugar-free gum and protein bars to energy drinks and low-calorie sodas, erythritol occurs naturally in some fruits but is now produced industrially for commercial use. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved it in 2001, and it’s marketed as a nearly ideal sugar substitute: it tastes about 60–80% as sweet as sugar, provides virtually no calories, and is generally considered safe for people with diabetes.
How Erythritol Alters Brain Vessel Cells
Researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder focused on human brain microvascular endothelial cells. These are specialized cells that line the tiny blood vessels in the brain. They are vital gatekeepers of the blood-brain barrier, regulating blood flow and blocking harmful substances from reaching brain tissue.
In the experiment, the team exposed these cells to a 6 millimolar (mM) concentration of erythritol for three hours — a dose that mimics typical human blood levels after consuming about 30 grams of the sweetener. The results were striking: erythritol increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) — a form of harmful cellular stress — by about 75%. It also disrupted the cells’ ability to produce nitric oxide, a protective molecule that keeps blood vessels open and healthy. Nitric oxide production dropped by around 20% in the erythritol-treated cells.
At the same time, levels of endothelin-1 (a powerful blood vessel constrictor) rose by about 30%. Tight regulation of blood vessel diameter is especially crucial in the brain, where steady blood flow is needed to keep neurons alive.
Perhaps most concerning was erythritol’s impact on the brain’s natural clot-busting system. When the researchers exposed the cells to thrombin, a protein that normally triggers the release of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) to dissolve clots, the untreated cells boosted their t-PA release by about 25%. But the erythritol-treated cells failed to respond at all.
A Recipe for Stroke?
The authors note that these cellular changes represent “central characteristics of cerebral vascular endothelial dysfunction and causative factors in the development, severity, and outcome of ischemic stroke.”
Ischemic stroke — which happens when a clot blocks blood flow to part of the brain — accounts for nearly 87% of all strokes. The combination of increased cellular stress, reduced nitric oxide, elevated endothelin-1, and impaired clot-busting ability could, in theory, create conditions that increase the risk of these dangerous blockages.
Researchers point out that brain blood vessels are especially vulnerable to this kind of damage because they contain large numbers of mitochondria, the tiny energy factories inside cells that are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress.
Is It Time To Substitute Sugar Subtitutes?
These results, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, are noteworthy given how common erythritol is and the mounting evidence linking it to cardiovascular issues. Recent large-scale studies have found that people with elevated blood levels of erythritol had a higher risk of heart attacks and strokes over three years. A small follow-up trial showed that consuming 30 grams of erythritol significantly increased platelet activity and clotting potential in healthy volunteers.
Unlike some cell studies that use unrealistically high doses, this research used erythritol levels that millions of people can realistically reach through normal consumption of sugar-free foods and drinks.
Still, the researchers acknowledge that the study has important limitations: it was conducted in isolated cells over a short period and does not prove that consuming erythritol causes strokes in real people. However, the cellular pathways they identified have been linked to stroke risk in other studies and provide a plausible mechanism worth investigating further.
Rethinking Erythritol
Erythritol’s rise from a niche ingredient to a mainstream sugar substitute reflects a broader trend: as obesity rates rise and more people try to manage diabetes, artificial sweeteners have become go-to products for cutting calories without giving up sweetness. Marketing often highlights the positives, noting that erythritol is “natural,” low-calorie, and doesn’t upset the gut the way other sugar substitutes can. But emerging research on its potential cardiovascular and cerebrovascular effects receives far less attention.
For now, this new evidence suggests that while erythritol may still have a place for people managing diabetes or weight, it may not be the entirely risk-free alternative it’s sometimes made out to be. Instead of searching for the perfect artificial sugar substitute, many health experts argue that training our palates to crave less sweetness overall — from any source — could be a healthier long-term strategy.
Disclaimer: This report summarizes the findings of an in vitro (lab-based) study. The research did not test erythritol’s effects in living humans, so it does not prove that consuming erythritol causes stroke or other health problems. Always consult qualified health professionals for advice about your diet and health choices.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers cultured human brain blood vessel cells and treated them with erythritol at levels equivalent to consuming 30 grams (about one artificially sweetened beverage) for 3-24 hours. They measured cellular stress markers, protective compound production, and clot-fighting responses. The study used five experimental units and employed standard cell culture techniques with appropriate controls.
Results
Erythritol treatment caused a 75% increase in harmful cellular stress and reduced protective nitric oxide production by 20%. The sweetener increased blood vessel constrictor production by 30% and completely blocked the normal clot-fighting response. While cells attempted to compensate by increasing protective proteins, this wasn’t sufficient to prevent overall cellular damage.
Limitations
This was a laboratory study using isolated brain cells over short time periods, so results may not directly translate to whole-body effects in living humans. Researchers couldn’t assess long-term exposure effects and didn’t test other artificial sweeteners for comparison. The study also couldn’t determine if cellular changes would reverse after erythritol exposure ended.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was supported in part by American Heart Association award 24TPA1301309. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Publication Information
“The non-nutritive sweetener erythritol adversely affects brain microvascular endothelial cell function” was published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, Volume 138, pages 1571-1577, 2025. First published online June 3, 2025,
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00276.2025
Erythritol is a sugar alcohol....like maltitol, mannitol, and sorbitol. Those are used in sugar free candies. Have they checked the other sugar alcohols?
Isn’t aspartame known to cause brain tumors?
Or, at least that was the buzz several years ago.
Disclaimer: This report summarizes the findings of an in vitro (lab-based) study. The research did not test erythritol’s effects in living humans, so it does not prove that consuming erythritol causes stroke or other health problems. Always consult qualified health professionals for advice about your diet and health choices.
In other words, junk science.
Amazon used to have some wonderful reviews of sugar-free gummi-bears; absolutely hilarious to those of us with a certain sense of humor.
I had some Godiva chocolates from Costco that were so bad I had to take them back. They had that stuff in them, and I’ve avoided it ever since.
Have they checked the other sugar alcohols?
Not aware. Perhaps this one is the most competition for the study sponsor’s products, so had to be smeared first?
Don’t know. When I was doing keto, I liked to use isomalt, though it’s not nearly as sweet as erythritol. Here’s a little more info:
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-to-know-about-sugar-alcohols
Do you tell your wife what to do?
I expect a “new, safe” sweetener soon.
That's a good question Jane.
Aspartame Brain Tumors
The question of whether aspartame causes brain tumors has been the subject of extensive research and debate. Some studies have suggested a potential link, while others have found no significant association. Here is a summary of the key findings:
A 1997 case-control study found no significant association between aspartame consumption and childhood brain tumor risk.
A 2006 study of 285,079 men and 188,905 women in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study found no increased risk of hematopoietic cancers or gliomas (malignant brain cancer) associated with aspartame consumption.
Some animal studies have shown an increased incidence of brain tumors in aspartame-fed rats, but these findings have been inconsistent and have not been replicated in human studies.
A 2023 report by the World Health Organization (WHO) classified aspartame as a possible carcinogen, but noted that the evidence was limited and that intake guidelines remain unchanged.
Overall, the majority of studies have not found a consistent link between aspartame consumption and brain tumor risk. However, the debate continues, and further research is needed to fully understand the potential risks associated with aspartame.
It’s an old joke, nothing personal.
And yes, I do tell my wife what to do,
when she is not around…
🤣
I wonder about Stevia.
GOOGLE AI Overview
While stevia is generally considered safe and is a popular sugar substitute, some individuals may experience side effects. Common side effects include bloating, nausea, dizziness, and numbness. Rarely, some may experience muscle pain or allergic reactions. Stevia may also cause low blood pressure or interact with certain medications.
Potential Side Effects:
Digestive Issues:
.
Some individuals may experience bloating, gas, or mild stomach upset, particularly if the stevia product contains added sugar alcohols like erythritol.
Low Blood Pressure:
.
Stevia can lower blood pressure, which could be a concern for those already managing low blood pressure or taking medications to lower blood pressure.
Allergic Reactions:
.
While rare, some individuals may be allergic to stevia, especially those with ragweed allergies, as they are from the same plant family.
Other Potential Side Effects:
.
Some studies suggest stevia may have potential links to kidney damage, endocrine disruption, or impacts on gut health, but these are not consistently reported in human trials.
Interactions with Medications:
.
Stevia may interact with medications used to lower blood sugar or blood pressure.
Taste:
.
Stevia’s taste can be off-putting for some, as it has a slightly bitter, licorice-like flavor.
Important Considerations:
Moderation is key:
.
While stevia is considered safe in moderate amounts, excessive consumption may lead to some side effects.
Individual Sensitivity:
.
People may react differently to stevia. If you experience any side effects, consider reducing your intake or consulting with a healthcare professional.
Stevia Products:
.
Some stevia products may contain additives like sugar alcohols or dextrose, which can cause digestive issues in some individuals.
Pregnancy:
.
It’s generally recommended to avoid whole-leaf stevia or crude stevia extract during pregnancy, as there is not enough evidence to confirm their safety.
Thanks.
I use stevia in my coffee in the morning. Truvia has both stevia and erythritol. So, it’s not completely true.
“I think that was what did in Euell Gibbons…”
Obligatory Euell Gibbons joke (must be told at any mention of Euell Gibbons):
Why did Euell Gibbons have blue babies?
Because he had grape nuts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0N290zPrbA
There are no shortcuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.