Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/18/2025 12:46:24 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: MtnClimber; SunkenCiv; rktman; mowowie; SuperLuminal; Cottonbay; telescope115; laplata; ...

Absolute Ping!...................


2 posted on 06/18/2025 12:46:57 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Marilyn would be sad.


3 posted on 06/18/2025 12:47:41 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

One of my favs:

If it is zero degrees and it gets twice as cold, how cold is it?

PS

I don’t know.


4 posted on 06/18/2025 12:54:29 PM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
First, he says that the “formalism” of thermodynamics essentially requires the existence of Nerst’s theoretical engine. However, the described machine must also be virtual, does not consume any heat, does not produce any work, and does not question the second principle. Olalla says the “concatenation” of these two nuances “allows us to conclude that entropy exchanges tend to zero when the temperature tends to. zero (which is Nernst’s theorem) and that absolute zero is inaccessible.”

This sounds like when I was working on my BS in CS, while Hollywood was making Star Trek The Next Generation. US CS students would argue about time travel paradoxes as though it was actually possible to travel in time and worth arguing about what would happen. LOL

5 posted on 06/18/2025 12:55:55 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Trust the science!

Until its proven wrong.

Hence the problem of inductive reasoning.....


6 posted on 06/18/2025 12:56:33 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If I’m proven wrong on something 120 years from now, I’m okay with that.


7 posted on 06/18/2025 12:57:26 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
From what I read, it sounds like nothing has been proven or disproven, and the theories are now just in competition with each other. However, Einstein's theory apparently still prevails for now, until the machine can be built. 😋👍

But can someone explain what the application would be? 🤣

11 posted on 06/18/2025 1:08:50 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

A crock of crap!
Einstein, given science at the time, was not “wrong”...
He just had a different opinion...

Everybody loves to claim Einstein was “wrong” about something...
He made many statements in the early 1900s that he later changed his mind on when new scientific techniques were developed...
He often recanted based on new info appearing...


12 posted on 06/18/2025 1:10:48 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
I'm an engineer, not a physicist or chemist and thus my understanding of this stuff is pretty rough. But I tend to imagine "heat" as being the kinetic energy of individual atoms, either zipping around in space or vibrating as it is held in place by any atomic/chemical bonds. And so absolutely zero would be a state of zero motion by the various atoms involved, with them locking into a motionless lattice or other framework as a solid material. But to interact with such absolute zero particles would mean moving other atoms into proximity with them, which inherently means the presence of heat (in the kinetic motion of atoms) according to my understanding.

There are probably some defects/shortcomings/caveats in my way of looking at it, but I can understand the point of the article in my way of looking at it.

15 posted on 06/18/2025 1:25:32 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
When I think about thermodynamics and absolute zero...


18 posted on 06/18/2025 1:33:03 PM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’ll stick with Einstein.


20 posted on 06/18/2025 1:47:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Physics bump for later.....


21 posted on 06/18/2025 1:51:34 PM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Heat is work, and work’s a curse
And all the heat in the universe
Is gonna cool down
‘Cause it can’t increase
Then there’ll be no more work
And there’ll be perfect peace
Really?
Yeah, that’s entropy man
-Flanders & Swann


22 posted on 06/18/2025 1:52:02 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
‘Absolute Zero’ has been proven real.


25 posted on 06/18/2025 2:27:38 PM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Here is the paper under discussion: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06503-w


38 posted on 06/18/2025 3:25:35 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
First, he says that the “formalism” of thermodynamics essentially requires the existence of Nerst’s theoretical engine. However, the described machine must also be virtual, does not consume any heat, does not produce any work, and does not question the second principle.

No work, means no engine. No such thing as an engine without it producing some form of work. It's pretty much definitional.

41 posted on 06/18/2025 3:28:32 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If you are in a car...traveling at the speed of light, and you turn on your headlights, what will you see?


42 posted on 06/18/2025 3:28:45 PM PDT by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
did not constitute a real violation of the second law of thermodynamics.

I'm sure there's a liberal judge out there what will rule that law unconstitutional.

50 posted on 06/18/2025 3:46:02 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

54 posted on 06/18/2025 3:57:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

And you get perfect electrical transmission at 0 Kelvin.


69 posted on 06/18/2025 7:27:30 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson