Posted on 02/12/2024 7:04:06 AM PST by SunkenCiv
I got a lot of questions last week about an article in Quanta Magazine about Dark Dimensions. it's about an idea motivated by string theory that combines large extra dimensions with dark matter. I had a look at the paper.
The paper is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05318
The article in quanta magazine is here: https://www.quantamagazine.org/...String theory nonsense makes comeback | 8:12
Sabine Hossenfelder | 1.13M subscribers | 147,734 views | February 7, 2024
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Transcript 0:00 · I got a lot of questions last week about an article in Quanta Magazine about Dark 0:05 · Dimensions. And for a change this is a case where I think I'm actually the right person to 0:10 · ask. What's this all about? Let's have a look. This recent work is based on string theory, 0:16 · an approach to a theory of everything that was invented in the 1970s. It was quite popular in 0:22 · the 80s and 90s. One of its main features is that it requires 9 dimensions of space. Now, 0:28 · as you've probably noticed, we don't live in 9 dimensions. So 0:32 · string theorists assumed that 6 of these dimensions are not infinitely large, 0:38 · they are rolled up to such small sizes that we wouldn't notice them. 0:42 · The new paper says that the extra dimensions could explain dark matter, if that exists, 0:48 · which it may not, hence the combination dark dimensions. Dark matter is what astrophysicists 0:55 · think makes up 80 percent of all the matter in the universe, but we can't see it and we have 1:00 · never managed to directly detect it. We only indirectly infer the presence of dark matter 1:06 · from its gravitational pull. This is why there's an alternative idea, that there's no dark matter, 1:12 · it's that we've got the law of gravity wrong. Though Albert doesn't like that at all. 1:19 · But back to the extra dimensions. In the original idea of string theory, these additional dimensions 1:25 · were so small that we can't measure them at all, about 10 to the minus 35 meters, 1:31 · a size know as the Planck length. It's named after Max Planck who also made the quip that 1:36 · science progresses one funeral at a time. Though I think that was very optimistic. 1:42 · Then, in the late 1990s some people had the ingenious idea to just conjecture that one or 1:48 · several of these hypothetical dimensions are much larger than the Planck length, 1:54 · so that they could become measurable with the next generations of experiments. These 1:59 · were called the "Large Extra Dimensions". You see, the way this kind of research 2:04 · work is that it's always the next experiment that will test these ideas. And if that next 2:10 · experiment doesn't find the stuff, then it's the next after that, and so on. Physicists 2:15 · usually justify this by a pseudoscientific argument called "naturalness" according to 2:21 · which some otherwise arbitrary values of model parameters are preferred by nature. 2:27 · These "naturalness" predictions can be shifted because they're not scientific to begin with. 2:31 · 20 years ago, there were a number of experiments that looked for 2:36 · these large extra dimensions, particle colliders, astrophysics, 2:40 · tabletop and so on. And would you believe it they didn't find them. 2:44 · The new paper is now about a revival of this old idea of large extra dimensions. Indeed, 2:50 · these "Dark Dimensions" are a new research program that seems to have begun in 2022 around 2:56 · Cumrun Vafa, a string theorist at Harvard who has been doing this stuff for decades. 3:01 · In their scenario, there is one extra dimension that is particularly large, and they ignore the 3:08 · other 5 as being too small to be measurable. This is not new, it was a rather common setup 20 years 3:14 · ago. The new thing is the justification for why this one dimension has a size of 3:20 · about one micrometer. This is supposedly "natural" because it's related to the cosmological constant 3:26 · and something to do with the swampland. Doesn't really matter exactly what this means because the 3:32 · swampland isn't real and naturalness arguments have failed over and over again in the past. 3:39 · In any case, this supposedly "natural" size of the extra dimension is great because, 3:46 · guess what, it could be tested with one of the next experiments. The current 3:51 · experimental constraints on the size of this dimension is currently about 52 micrometres. 3:58 · Okay, but what does this have to do with dark matter? 4:01 · In such large extra dimensions, you must assume that forces which we have measured on very short 4:08 · distances, that's the nuclear forces and also electromagnetism, don't notice the 4:14 · additional dimensions. And actually, all the matter that we are made of can't travel into 4:20 · these directions either. In string theory speech, this normal matter is "confined to the brane". 4:26 · That's b r a n e not b r a i n, is derived from "membrane" and is our normal three 4:33 · dimensional space. So all the normal stuff needs to stay on that 3 dimensional brane. 4:40 · The reason is that atomic nuclei are much smaller than this micrometer which is the 4:45 · supposed size of the extra dimension. And if the constituents of nuclei 4:50 · could spread into more than 3 dimensions nuclear physics wouldn't properly work. 4:55 · But here's the thing. There's no such problem for gravity, 5:00 · so they can assume that gravity does experience the large extra dimensions. 5:05 · And these extra dimensions then explain dark matter as follows. Whenever you have rolled 5:11 · something up you get standing waves in this rolled up direction. For gravity, these standing waves 5:18 · are quanta of the gravitational field, called gravitons. And if they're standing waves, 5:24 · they have masses that depend on how many wavelengths fit into the extra dimension. 5:30 · These massive gravitons can make up dark matter. Again this isn't a new idea, this is the same 5:36 · thing people did 25 years ago. They were even looking for this stuff at the LHC and didn't 5:42 · find it. For this new theory they just use some parameter ranges that have not yet been excluded. 5:49 · The novelty of the Dark Dimensions scenario is that the extra dimension doesn't have 5:54 · the same radius everywhere. This has the effect that the mass of these gravitons 5:59 · isn't the same everywhere and the heavier ones can decay. This basically heats up 6:04 · the gravitons with lower masses and since they're hotter that changes the behaviour 6:09 · of the dark stuff. They say that this heating effect would affect the large-scale structure 6:14 · of galactic filaments and guess what, that future experiments could soon rule that out. 6:21 · You know what I'll go out on a limb and say they 6:24 · won't find any evidence for the decay of these massive gravitons. 6:28 · Last year, I coincidentally noticed that if you asked Google for my cell 6:33 · phone number it gave you an answer. Luckily I changed my number three years ago and the 6:39 · one that Google spat out was my old one. But that was somewhat of an eye opening. 6:46 · I have since signed up to Incogni, who have been sponsoring this video. 6:50 · You see, each time you open a website, it'll try to collect data about who you are and 6:56 · where you are and what other websites you've visited. If you then sign up for a website 7:01 · and fill in your personal details, they can, and often do, make money by selling 7:06 · your private information to data brokers. Most countries have laws against that, 7:11 · and you can ask for your data to be removed. But doing this takes up a lot of time. 7:17 · Incogni automates the process of getting you out of those databases. You sign up and 7:22 · they'll contact the big sinners, request that your personal details be removed. They'll keep on doing 7:29 · that and, if you want, send you updates about the progress they're making. I am glad there's 7:35 · now a simple solution to stop unfriendly people doing nasty things with my personal details. 7:41 · Incogni is super easy to use. You sign up, give them the information they should look for, 7:41 · and they go to work, like, within a minute basically. I now sleep better at night, 7:42 · and maybe I can help you sleep better too. If you use our code SABINE or the custom link in the info 7:42 · below, you will get sixty percent off of incogni. That's an amazing deal, so go and check this out. 7:42 · Incogni is super easy to use. You sign up, give them the information they should look for, and 7:46 · they go to work, like, within a minute basically. I now sleep better at night, and maybe I can help 7:52 · you sleep better too. The first 100 people who use our code SABINE or the custom link in the 7:59 · info below will get sixty percent off of incogni. That's an amazing deal, so go and check this out. 8:06 · Thanks for watching, see you next week.
She's embraced the AGW nonsense, but she remains number one in Scientertainment ™.
I’ve never heard String Theory referred to as nonsense. I know Loop Theory is now in the debate. I haven’t delved too deeply into the mix, so I’m just on the sideline.
I don’t think she’s saying String Theory is nonsense, just Dark Dimensions and naturalness.
review
Somewhere in the multiverse, I am the dictator of the USA and all the Democrats and liberals are in work camps.
I thought string theory had been replaced by M theory?
I love how things are invented because explanations for things like not enough mass to make a galaxy spin like that.
Dark Matter Dark Energy etc is like frog dna in Jurassic park. It won’t work without it so let’s stuff something in to fudge it.
String Theory Meets Loop Quantum Gravity
Sabine Hossenfelder
Contributing Columnist
January 12, 2016
https://www.quantamagazine.org/string-theory-meets-loop-quantum-gravity-20160112/
Randy Bachman was a member of The Guess Who.............
“I love how things are invented because explanations for things like not enough mass to make a galaxy spin like that.”
Neptune and Pluto were “invented” before they were discovered.
I'm not sure how you could get work out of them. And that's where this comment will come to a whoa. :^)
Yeah. It’s a thinker.
wiki
Gravitational lensing
One of the consequences of general relativity is massive objects (such as a cluster of galaxies) lying between a more distant source (such as a quasar) and an observer should act as a lens to bend light from this source. The more massive an object, the more lensing is observed.
Strong lensing is the observed distortion of background galaxies into arcs when their light passes through such a gravitational lens. It has been observed around many distant clusters including Abell 1689.[66] By measuring the distortion geometry, the mass of the intervening cluster can be obtained. In the dozens of cases where this has been done, the mass-to-light ratios obtained correspond to the dynamical dark matter measurements of clusters.[67] Lensing can lead to multiple copies of an image. By analyzing the distribution of multiple image copies, scientists have been able to deduce and map the distribution of dark matter around the MACS J0416.1-2403 galaxy cluster.[68][69]
Weak gravitational lensing investigates minute distortions of galaxies, using statistical analyses from vast galaxy surveys. By examining the apparent shear deformation of the adjacent background galaxies, the mean distribution of dark matter can be characterized. The mass-to-light ratios correspond to dark matter densities predicted by other large-scale structure measurements.[70] Dark matter does not bend light itself; mass (in this case the mass of the dark matter) bends spacetime. Light follows the curvature of spacetime, resulting in the lensing effect.[71][72]
In May 2021, a new detailed dark matter map was revealed by the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration.[73] In addition, the map revealed previously undiscovered filamentary structures connecting galaxies, by using a machine learning method.[74]
An April 2023 study in Nature Astronomy examined the inferred distribution of the dark matter responsible for the lensing of the elliptical galaxy HS 0810+2554, and found tentative evidence of interference patterns within the dark matter. The observation of interference patterns is incompatible with WIMPs, but would be compatible with simulations involving 10−22 eV axions. While acknowledging the need to corroborate the findings by examining other astrophysical lenses, the authors argued that “The ability of (axion-based dark matter) to resolve lensing anomalies even in demanding cases such as HS 0810+2554, together with its success in reproducing other astrophysical observations, tilt the balance toward new physics invoking axions.”[12][75]
Not for me! I knew!....................
Like ‘Free’ and ‘Bad Company’.......................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.