Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government-Funded Science Journal Admits Over 2,600 of its Papers May Have ‘Exaggerated Claims’
American Greatness ^ | 23 Aug, 2023 | Eric Lendrum

Posted on 08/23/2023 8:24:27 AM PDT by MtnClimber

A top science journal that receives funding from the federal government was recently forced to admit that well over 2,000 of the research papers it has published contain “exaggerated claims.”

As Just The News reports, over 2,600 papers from the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s (AAAS) peer-reviewed journal Science were closely scrutinized by rival research journal Scientometrics. In the subsequent study, it was determined that, from 1997 to 2021, the journal saw a 40% drop in the use of “hedging” words.

In scientific research and other forms of academic writing, “hedging” words refers to terms and phrases such as “could” or “appear to,” in order to provide some room for doubt rather than depict absolute confidence. In 1997, there were roughly 115.8 examples of hedging for every 10,000 words. However, by 2021, that rate had fallen to just 67.42 per every 10,000.

Responding to the criticism, the news division of Science acknowledged that this new research “suggests a worrisome rise of unreliable, exaggerated claims.”

The non-profit watchdog group Influence Watch reports that “the federal government is the largest identifiable source of funding for AAAS,” as the association has received roughly $3.3 million per year from the federal government between 2008 and 2017, in addition to many other grants the association received.

“Less hedging may reflect a subtle strategy by authors to sell their results to editors and readers as an alternative to explicit exaggeration,” Scientonomics continued in their report.

Most recently, AAAS published numerous works that were overwhelmingly skeptical of theories claiming that the COVID-19 pandemic originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, going so far as label the suggestion “a conspiracy theory.”

Social psychologist Melissa Wheeler said that the study’s findings prove that displaying prudence in academic research is “vital to communicating what one’s data can actually say and what it merely implies.”

“If academic writing becomes more about the rhetoric,” Wheeler continued, “it will become more difficult for readers to decipher what is groundbreaking and truly novel.”

Despite these findings, Science largely doubled down on the practice, with executive editor Valda Vinsion claiming that the decrease in hedging language was due to authors being required to provide additional citations.

“We tone down language if it comes across as definitive when [the evidence] is not,” Vinsion insisted in a statement.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: antarctic; antarctica; disinformation; ecoterrorism; ecoterrorists; globalwarminghoax; greenland; greennewdeal; science

1 posted on 08/23/2023 8:24:27 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

LET ME GUESS...GLOBAL WARMING...CLIMATE CHANGE...


2 posted on 08/23/2023 8:25:39 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Might have? OMG - Americans trust the crooks and goons at the DOJ more than they trust ‘scientists’...


3 posted on 08/23/2023 8:26:34 AM PDT by GOPJ (Hunter Biden’s pet name for his father on his cellphone. It was “Pedo Peter”. Jim Hoft )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Bookmark


4 posted on 08/23/2023 8:28:08 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Despite these findings, Science largely doubled down on the practice, with executive editor Valda Vinsion claiming that the decrease in hedging language was due to authors being required to provide additional citations.


citing more bad research is the solution.


5 posted on 08/23/2023 8:29:16 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Less hedging may reflect a subtle strategy by authors to sell their results to editors and readers as an alternative to explicit exaggeration,” Scientonomics continued in their report.


Read it slowly and let your lips move...................


6 posted on 08/23/2023 8:31:36 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Lancet keyword, sorted:

7 posted on 08/23/2023 8:48:40 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It’s only about 2 per week—— for 2 1/2 decades.


8 posted on 08/23/2023 8:52:23 AM PDT by dgbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Not Exaggerated Claims but outright Lies


9 posted on 08/23/2023 8:55:53 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

They mean that peer review is not the gold standard for assessing scientific research after all?

What a surprise......


10 posted on 08/23/2023 9:03:05 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

When .gov funds bad science you get more bad science.


11 posted on 08/23/2023 9:05:55 AM PDT by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

12 posted on 08/23/2023 9:36:53 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Sufferings are the guardrails on the road to Heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

.


13 posted on 08/23/2023 9:52:18 AM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Trust the science!”

-from the same people who say there are more than 2 genders, men can have babies and menstruate.


14 posted on 08/23/2023 10:00:57 AM PDT by lowbridge ("Let’s check with Senator Schumer before we run it" - NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson