Can this be true? What possible reason could such an esteemed publication have for suppressing evidence about the covid right before a Presidential election that casts blame on the country of China?
Its all so bewildering.
Posted on 07/24/2021 11:48:50 PM PDT by knighthawk
The world's most famous medical journal, The Lancet, sat on vital information being suppressed by China proving that the Covid virus could jump from human to human and was spreading outside of Wuhan in the early days of the pandemic.
Its editors also failed to share critical evidence – given to them by brave Chinese scientists trying to alert the world to the danger of the new disease – that showed the new coronavirus could be spread by people who were not displaying symptoms.
The revelation has emerged in a new book by Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The Lancet also did a hitpiece on Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) in order to kill even more Covid victims...
thanks, knighthawk.
The rest of you : *PING*
Can this be true? What possible reason could such an esteemed publication have for suppressing evidence about the covid right before a Presidential election that casts blame on the country of China?
Its all so bewildering.
Any self-declared ‘gate keeper’ of information will have built-in bias. Lancet is to medicine what The Economist is to economics and what Scientific American is to science: mouthpieces for those who pay the bills, and hardly unbiased arbiters of their supposed areas of expertise.
Good grief!
With a title like that, 70% of everything in the article must be fake news...
BTW, the world's most famous literature was written by Barak Obunghole...
They also cost even more lives by their bogus study of HCQ to produce a fake report showing that it was dangerous. They should have to pay a heavy price for their lies and coverups. But they won’t.
The bias is a function of modern culture. The thinking and behavior of our founding fathers was heavily influenced by Christian teaching about morality and the enlightenment concept of virtue. They aspired to live virtuous lives and to seek “truth”. Rigorous pursuit of truth drove the scientific exploration of the 19th and early 20th centuries as well. Researchers challenge convention and orthodoxy through experimentation to determine truth.
Today we have no standards for truth or the evaluation of data. Science has been politicized. Plus most researchers depend on corrupt institutions (government and corporations) for funding. Since our culture has lost its common understanding of morality we are not a virtuous people. These journals simply reflect the rot of our society.
You beat me to it. We can consider it more confirmation of that truthful fact. 🙂
Like water filling a container, human nature seeks the lowest levels.
There was a time, not very long ago and not too far away where slave labor and mass murder was the way of doing business. And it was legal within the jurisdictions it was happening.
Well stated. This has been my observation as well. I concur 100%.
White House response: “We’ve said again and again calling it the China virus is racist”
The Lancet long lost any credibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.