Posted on 07/28/2023 12:12:29 PM PDT by Red Badger
(By Jon Miltimore, FEE) Ford Motor recently announced it is slashing prices on its F-150 Lightning, an electric vehicle the company rolled out in 2021.
The Lightning now carries a suggested retail price of $49,995, about $10,000 lower than its previous recommended price tag ($59,974), a reduction the company says is possible because of lower “battery raw material costs and continued work on scaling production and cost.”
It’s certainly possible that reduced overhead from battery minerals and production costs played a role in Ford’s decision to trim its price tag by nearly 20%, but that may be only half the story.
Several reports show EVs are not exactly flying off dealership lots. In fact, there’s a glut of them.
“After a prolonged period in which EVs quickly disappeared from dealerships, the electric vehicle industry now has the opposite problem: unsold models are piling up,” reported Money last week. “About 92,000 EVs currently sit on dealers’ lots; that’s a 342% increase from a year ago, when only about 21,000 did so, according to automotive research firm Cox Automotive.”
Ford is not immune from the weakened demand for EVs. Sales of its flagship car, the Mustang Mach-E, have slumped, down 44 percent in May from the same month last year.
The Lightning, which won the title of EV king of pickup trucks after Ford moved nearly 16,000 units in 2022, has fared better but is still struggling to keep pace with 2022. And now the company is facing some stiff new competition. (More on that in a minute.)
This was not the scenario many people predicted.
In April, the International Energy Agency released a report in which it predicted EV sales to increase 35 percent after a record-breaking year. But economists I spoke with said such predictions were overly optimistic considering current macroeconomic conditions.
This invites important questions. Is the glut of EVs simply a product of tightened money supply?
Apparently not. As Axios noted, the 92,000 EVs currently sitting on lots is comparatively high relative to gasoline-powered cars.
“That’s a 92-day supply — roughly three months’ worth of EVs, and nearly twice the industry average,” wrote Joann Muller. “For comparison, dealers have a relatively low 54 days’ worth of gasoline-powered vehicles in inventory….”
In other words, dealerships are sitting on a lot more EVs than gasoline-powered vehicles—despite efforts to entice consumers to buy EVs with taxpayer-funded credits up to $7,500.
This is evidence that pretty much everyone—from central planners to auto manufacturers—misjudged the demand for EVs, which are not even as environmentally friendly as politicians would have you believe.
Not only do EVs require an astonishing amount of mining—an estimated 500,000 pounds of rock and minerals must be upturned to make a single battery, physicists point out—but their carbon footprint isn’t much smaller than gas-powered cars.
It turns out that EVs actually require a lot more CO2 to produce than gas-powered cars. EVs can make that up, but it takes a great deal of time because EVs also often run on electricity generated from fossil fuels. Just how long? In 2021, Volvo admitted that its C40 Recharge has to be driven 70,000 miles before its carbon impact is lower than its gas-powered version.
All of this is to say that a bunch of unused EVs isn’t just a financial headache for auto dealers and motor companies; it’s also an environmental problem.
That said, the weaker than expected demand for EVs doesn’t mean the future of electric vehicles is doomed. On the contrary, demand for EVs is likely to increase as battery technology and EV infrastructure improves. Ford’s Lightning, for example, only has half the range of its gas-powered F-150 because of its small battery—a clear concern when charging stations are not yet readily available in many places.
For now, however, motor companies are competing with one another to attract customers in a smaller than anticipated EV market. Which brings me to Elon Musk.
Tesla last week rolled out its much-hyped Cybertruck, which is a direct challenge to the Lightning, and likely played a role in Ford’s price cut.
Federal lawmakers may have created a glut of EVs with their meddling, and it’s likely to have an adverse impact on both the auto market and the environment. But one of the virtues of capitalism is that consumers will ultimately decide who wins in the EV market and who loses.
Whether that turns out to be Musk’s Cybertruck or Ford’s Lightning remains to be seen. Either way, the competition is bringing down prices, which is a win for consumers looking to purchase an EV.
But the glut of electrical vehicles on the market reveals the danger in letting lawmakers decide what consumers should be driving.
We still haven’t seen TeslaGator here in awhile.
I can start a fire with a few gallons of diesel a lot cheaper than an EV.
That might be easily accomplished ; )
“Do you think the businesses care about market forces?”
The problem is they will just effectively put a tax on the ICE vehicles high enough so people will be forced to buy an EV. It is part of the reset to “save” the planet. It is supported by all the scientists and MSM the government has bought off.
It’s a showroom, delivery center & service center. Some of the cars may be there for service, or they might be older Teslas that people have traded in to new ones. I don’t know. I’ve just notice a lot more cars accumulating there within the last several months or so.
Bugatti Chiron – 8.0-litre W16 It would be hard to write a list of automotive engine superlatives without including the Chiron, successor to the all-conquering Bugatti Veyron. The Chiron adopted its forebear’s 8.0-litre W16 engine but in a state of tune delivering 1,500PS (1,479bhp), a full 499PS (492bhp) more than the original Veyron. Driven by Juan Pablo Montoya, in 2017 the Chiron set a record by accelerating to 400kmh (249mph) and then back to a standstill in 41.96 seconds.
Two years later, in the hands of chief test driver Andy Wallace a modified Chiron set a production car top speed record of 304.77mph. Also driven by Andy Wallace at the same Volkswaged Ehra-Lessien test track was the life-size Lego Technic Bugatti Chiron. Powered by 2,304 Lego motors it produced approximately 5.4PS (5.4bhp) and 92Nm (68lb ft).
It is articles like this that will run the Bee out of business.
Just program them to drive into the ocean. If they are close enough.
There is a lot near my house where a strip mall was torn down. The lot is full of brand new EV’s, mostly Teslas. They have been there almost a year now.
Maybe they need to hire Dylan Mulvaney to help them out.
As I understand it, conventional auto scrap yards will not take EVs....if that’s accurate, it’s one more of a myriad of reasons they are a bad idea.
“All of this is to say that a bunch of unused EVs isn’t just a financial headache for auto dealers and motor companies...”
Let them eat the bloody things. Dealers are a bunch of thieving shysters anyhow.
I’m hearing that it’s not safe to have an EV in the garage and it’s not safe from theft keeping them outside.
“I suggest having a fire sale.”
Oh yeah, they’ll be having a fire sooner or later.
Maybe because:
They are still to expensive for most
The people who wanted one already bought one
People don’t want to burn their house
People have heard to many horror stories about reliability and warranty
People learned the ugly truth about range
The trill is gone
The hype has worn thin
Sanity has returned, strike that.
What could it be? Inquiring minds want to know.
“they might be older Teslas that people have traded in on new ones...”
Boy, there really is no fixing stupid is there? SMH
How difficult would it be to remove the battery pack and the motor(s) before sending to the scrap yard, I wonder?
They thought we were THAT stupi.
They are a niche product for a niche society...............
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.