Posted on 01/20/2023 7:39:39 AM PST by Red Badger
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC4) – A Utah plastic surgeon, his neighbor, and two others are facing charges after allegedly giving people fake vaccination cards and destroying government-provided COVID vaccinations.
Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Jr., 58, and his neighbor, Kristin Jackson Andersen, 59, have been charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government property, conversion sale, conveyance, and disposal of government property and aiding and abetting.
The Plastic Institute of Utah Inc., along with office manager Kari Dee Burgoyne, 52, and receptionist Sandra Flores, 31, faces the same charges. According to court documents, Moore and his co-defendants allegedly ran a scheme out of Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah Inc. to defraud the United States and the CDC.
The documents say Moore and Andersen were members of a private organization seeking to “liberate the medical profession from government and industry conflicts of interest.”
In the allegations, the four destroyed at least $28,000 worth of Covid vaccinations and distributed at least 1,900 doses’ worth of fake completed vaccination record cards. The court documents allege the fake vaccination cards were sold either for direct cash payments of $50 per person per occurrence or required “donations to a specified charitable organization.”
The court documents estimate the fake vaccination cards have a total value of nearly $97,000.
Moore and his co-defendants also allegedly gave children saline shots at the request of their parents so the children would think they were receiving a Covid vaccine.
“By allegedly falsifying vaccine cards and administering saline shots to children instead of vaccines, not only did this provider endanger the health and well-being of a vulnerable population, but also undermined public trust and the integrity of federal health care programs,” said Special Agent in Charge with the Department of Health and Human Services.
The defendants are scheduled for their initial appearance in court on Jan. 26 at 2 p.m.
Well, no. Since VAERS wasn’t established until 1990
Uhm. Well sorry to disappoint you. I *think* I have heard some talk of a documentary on the subject that was called something similar to "Died Suddenly". Have not watched it.
Only an idiot would think the jabs safe though after the VAERs data spike, and since I am not an idiot I recognized at the time they were dangerous.
Ping
Indeed. So your assertion is incorrect since certainly the huge spike of deaths reported to VAERs is an argument against the safety of the jabs. Such spikes have never existed before for any vaccine.
So do you ever adjust your thinking when you are obviously wrong?
Forgive me, I mistook you for the one who had made the bogus assertion.
And here we were, having a discussion about a doctor avoiding giving unnecessary and potentially harmful vaccines (with the full consent of the legal guardians of those patients) to a patient population that was in very little danger of harm from the infection that vaccine would not prevent them from either contracting or spreading.
Then DugwayDuke had to bring the US Government into it.
I hope they all plead not guilty by reason of defense of humanity and make the prosecutors take them to trial and take the stand to explain their motive.
It says in the article the “price” charged in some cases was a charitable contribution. It would be a hoot if one of the charities was Children’s Health Defense or some such and if, in the case where parents paid $50 bucks instead of making the contribution, the doctor turned around and donated a fair amount of this.
Are the parents going to be arrested since they were in on it?
I wonder how many parents had kids who did NOT have to be vaxxed for school or sports and instead had kids who were freaked out they were going to die from Covid or kill grandma so they had to lie to them about the vaxx.
If they are arrested themselves and turn state’s evidence against the doctor, the defense attorney is going to have great fun on cross.
Please follow this case and post about as developments occur.
I’ll try, but no guarantees.....................
AndyTheBear wrote: “For example did the small pox vaccine have a gigantic spike of reported deaths on the VAERs system. Yes or No?”
Small pox vaccination was developed in the late 1700’s. At the time, the small pox vaccination was claimed to turn people into cows. It was claimed that the vaccination contained poisonous substances such as bat feces. Now the claim is the mRNA changes your DNA. Now, the claim is the mRNA is also poisonous. Same kind of claims, different vaccine.
Research the history of vaccination. You’ll find the same arguments made against all vaccines. Sometimes by the same people.
rlmorel wrote: “And here we were, having a discussion about a doctor avoiding giving unnecessary and potentially harmful vaccines (with the full consent of the legal guardians of those patients) to a patient population that was in very little danger of harm from the infection that vaccine would not prevent them from either contracting or spreading.”
We have a doctor who was defrauding the government, destroying vaccines, providing false documentation. Mal Practice, fraud, conspiracy to committ fraud.
And, yes, the vaccines are not 100% effective in preventing covid but there are no vaccines that are 100% effective in preventing or stopping the spread of a disease.
Now did every vaccine since small pox have a huge spike of reported deaths of VAERs?
If the answer is "No" then your assertion was wrong.
If the answer is "Yes" it would be fun to see you try to show how that is even plausible.
So which is it. Did every other vaccine have a huge spike of reported deaths on VAERs?
Well, there isn't a leg to stand on there. It is a felony to falsify a Federal Document. The Shot Record has the seal of the CDC on the upper right and at the bottom right is printed MLS-319813_r The federal document tracking number.
I would vote to exonerate all parties, especially because they were providing the saline shots to children who had almost zero chance of contracting Covid-19 in the first place, and the almost certain chance of surviving Covid-19 with only natural immunity as a result.
Nobody but you brought up a requirement to be 100% effective. The jab's efficacy is such that even though it is widely used with many boosters and follow ups the disease its supposed to prevent is endemic in both the jabbed and the un-jabbed.
By contrast small pox was eradicated where in countries that took the vaccine.
Endemic vs Eradicated is the difference. 100% vs not 100% is not.
People who view the clinicians involved in the proceedings who did this with the full approval of the parties in question as adherents to the Hippocratic Oath (which instructs physicians to do no harm) as moral and conscientious. I am in this group.
And it makes absolutely zero difference as to whether the vaccine is 100% effective or 100% ineffective.
What is important is that these parents and their children were being unconstitutionally coerced to have this invasive medical procedure administered against their will at the gunpoint of either losing their jobs or being denied education that their tax dollars have already paid for.
I know what side you are on, and I know which side I am on. And that makes us enemies, because you would see me lose my job rather than sacrifice my rights to benefit, as you so richly stated, "...grifters getting rich by spreading misinformation to the gullible..."
rlmorel wrote: “It is my observation that people who wholly swallow the government stance on this vaccine as “safe and effective” view these people as criminals. You are in this group. People who view the clinicians involved in the proceedings who did this with the full approval of the parties in question as adherents to the Hippocratic Oath (which instructs physicians to do no harm) as moral and conscientious. I am in this group.”
I’m in the group that views these clinicians as acting in an illegal way. The fact that they didn’t want to vaccinate their patients isn’t an adequate defense. All they had to do was refuse to do so. Instead, they commited fraud, conspiracy to committ fraud, and malpractice.
rlmorel wrote: “What is important is that these parents and their children were being unconstitutionally coerced to have this invasive medical procedure administered against their will at the gunpoint of either losing their jobs or being denied education that their tax dollars have already paid for.”
It has been long established that mandatory vaccinations are not unconstitutional.
AndyTheBear wrote: “Nobody but you brought up a requirement to be 100% effective. The jab’s efficacy is such that even though it is widely used with many boosters and follow ups the disease its supposed to prevent is endemic in both the jabbed and the un-jabbed.”
Every times someone states that the vaccines do not prevent covid or prevent it’s spread, they are bringing up a requirement to be 100% effective. Since there are no vaccines that are 100% effective, no vaccine prevents disease or it’s spread in all cases.
So, let them track down everyone he gave the fake vax to. Bet they’re doing fine. Unless, of course, they got a vax elsewhere later.
No good deed goes unpunished.
A MAJOR AWARD?.........................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.